World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ioannis Caragiannis

Ioannis Caragiannis

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4978
World Ranking
11734
National Ranking
53

Ioannis Caragiannis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Caragiannis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ioannis Caragiannis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Caragiannis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ioannis Caragiannis is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of computer science, economics, and decision sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields, including economics and econometrics, management science and operations research, artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, and computer networks and communications.

Their main topics of research focus on game theory and voting systems, auction theory and applications, complexity and algorithms in graphs, game theory and applications, optimization and search problems, logic, reasoning and knowledge, as well as internet traffic analysis and secure e-voting.

Caragiannis has published numerous papers in prominent venues. Recent publications include:

  • Computing Envy-Freeable Allocations with Limited Subsidies, 2022, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • The Metric Distortion of Multiwinner Voting, 2022, Artificial Intelligence
  • A Little Charity Guarantees Fair Connected Graph Partitioning, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Portioning Using Ordinal Preferences: Fairness and Efficiency, 2022, Artificial Intelligence
  • Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Chores, 2021, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

Caragiannis frequently collaborates with several researchers, with notable co-authors including Nidhi Rathi, Alexandros A. Voudouris, Karl Fehrs, Nisarg Shah, and Shivika Narang.

Their publications are primarily found in high-impact venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence journal, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, and Mathematical Programming.

Additionally, they have authored books, notably a contribution to "Algorithmic Game Theory" published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

Best Publications

  • The Efficiency of Fair Division

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Christos Kaklamanis;Panagiotis Kanellopoulos;Maria Kyropoulou

  • Tight Bounds for Selfish and Greedy Load Balancing

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Michele Flammini;Christos Kaklamanis;Panagiotis Kanellopoulos

  • Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Chores

    Haris Aziz;Ioannis Caragiannis;Ayumi Igarashi;Toby Walsh

  • On the approximability of Dodgson and Young elections

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Jason A. Covey;Michal Feldman;Christopher M. Homan

  • Voting almost maximizes social welfare despite limited communication

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Ariel D. Procaccia

  • Subset Selection Via Implicit Utilitarian Voting

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Swaprava Nath;Ariel D. Procaccia;Nisarg Shah

  • When do noisy votes reveal the truth

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Ariel D. Procaccia;Nisarg Shah

  • Geometric clustering to minimize the sum of cluster sizes

    Vittorio Bilò;Ioannis Caragiannis;Christos Kaklamanis;Panagiotis Kanellopoulos

  • Envy-Freeness Up to Any Item with High Nash Welfare: The Virtue of Donating Items

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Nick Gravin;Xin Huang

  • Optimal social choice functions

    Craig Boutilier;Ioannis Caragiannis;Simi Haber;Tyler Lu

  • Socially desirable approximations for dodgson’s voting rule

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Christos Kaklamanis;Nikos Karanikolas;Ariel D. Procaccia

  • Taxes for linear atomic congestion games

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Christos Kaklamanis;Panagiotis Kanellopoulos

  • Efficient Coordination Mechanisms for Unrelated Machine Scheduling

    Ioannis Caragiannis

  • Approximation algorithms and mechanism design for minimax approval voting

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Dimitris Kalaitzis;Evangelos Markakis

  • Almost Envy-Free Allocations with Connected Bundles

    Vittorio Bilò;Ioannis Caragiannis;Michele Flammini;Ayumi Igarashi

  • Communication in wireless networks with directional antennas

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Christos Kaklamanis;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc

  • Energy-Efficient Wireless Network Design

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Christos Kaklamanis;Panagiotis Kanellopoulos

  • Efficient Computation of Approximate Pure Nash Equilibria in Congestion Games

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Angelo Fanelli;Nick Gravin;Alexander Skopalik

  • How bad is selfish voting

    Simina Brânzei;Ioannis Caragiannis;Jamie Morgenstern;Ariel D. Procaccia

  • New bounds on the size of the minimum feedback vertex set in meshes and butterflies

    Ioannis Caragiannis;Christos Kaklamanis;Panagiotis Kanellopoulos

  • Better bounds for online load balancing on unrelated machines

    Ioannis Caragiannis

Frequent Co-Authors

Ariel D. Procaccia
Ariel D. Procaccia Harvard University
Giuseppe Persiano
Giuseppe Persiano University of Salerno
Haris Aziz
Haris Aziz University of New South Wales
Jérôme Lang
Jérôme Lang Paris Dauphine University
Éva Tardos
Éva Tardos Cornell University
Toby Walsh
Toby Walsh University of New South Wales
Craig Boutilier
Craig Boutilier Google (United States)
Jeffrey S. Rosenschein
Jeffrey S. Rosenschein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Michal Feldman
Michal Feldman Tel Aviv University
Avrim Blum
Avrim Blum Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in Computer Science can open doors to a range of interdisciplinary and high-demand career pathways. Many students consider related online degrees to further enhance their skill sets or complement their main area of study.

For example, those interested in hardware, robotics, or manufacturing may explore the mechanical engineering cost of education to evaluate affordable pathways into engineering fields. Others may opt for online physics degrees, which can build a foundation in theory and problem-solving that benefits careers in computing and engineering alike.

Enthusiasts for analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence should consider data science programs — an area with strong job growth and diverse industry applications. Likewise, studying online electrical engineering courses USA provides critical knowledge for students interested in embedded systems, IoT, or telecommunications.

Exploring these related online degrees not only broadens your academic portfolio but also increases your marketability in today's dynamic tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Ioannis Caragiannis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles