World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
6145
World Ranking
12495
National Ranking
5071

Constance L. Heitmeyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constance L. Heitmeyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 125 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Constance L. Heitmeyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constance L. Heitmeyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to formal methods for modeling and analyzing software system requirements

Overview

Constance L. Heitmeyer is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on areas including Software, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their main research topics include:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques

Heitmeyer has contributed to the academic community through several papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Formal Methods for Specifying, Validating, and Verifying Requirements," published in 2020 in the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)
  • "Applying the SCR Requirements Method to the Light Control Case Study," published in 2020 in the TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

Their frequent co-author is Ramesh Bharadwaj.

Heitmeyer has published in venues such as:

  • Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)
  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)

In recognition of their work, Heitmeyer was named an IEEE Fellow in 2015, cited specifically for contributions to formal methods for modeling and analyzing software system requirements.

Best Publications

  • Automated consistency checking of requirements specifications

    Constance L. Heitmeyer;Ralph D. Jeffords;Bruce G. Labaw

  • Using model checking to generate tests from requirements specifications

    Angelo Gargantini;Constance Heitmeyer

  • Using abstraction and model checking to detect safety violations in requirements specifications

    C. Heitmeyer;J. Kirby;B. Labaw;M. Archer

  • A security model for military message systems

    Carl E. Landwehr;Constance L. Heitmeyer;John McLean

  • Formal Methods for Real-Time Computing: an Overview

    C. Heitmeyer;D. Mandrioli

  • SCR: A Toolset for Specifying and Analyzing Software Requirements.

    C. Heitmeyer;J. Kirby;B. Labaw;R. Bharadwaj

  • Model Checking Complete Requirements Specifications Using Abstraction

    Ramesh Bharadwaj;Constance L. Heitmeyer

  • SCR: a toolset for specifying and analyzing requirements

    C. Heitmeyer;A. Bull;C. Gasarch;B. Labaw

  • Consistency checking of SCR-style requirements specifications

    C. Heitmeyer;B. Labaw;D. Kiskis

  • Formal Methods for Real-Time Computing

    Constance Heitmeyer;Dino Mandrioli

  • Requirements Engineering and Technology Transfer: Obstacles, Incentives and Improvement Agenda

    Hermann Kaindl;Sjaak Brinkkemper;Janis A. Bubenko;Barbara Farbey

  • The generalized railroad crossing: a case study in formal verification of real-time systems

    Unknown

  • Using Model Checking to Generate Tests from Requirements Specifications

    Unknown

  • On the Need for Practical Formal Methods

    Constance L. Heitmeyer

  • A Benchmark for Comparing Different Approaches for Specifying and Verifying Real-Time Systems

    C. L. Heitmeyer;B. G. Labaw;R. D. Jeffords

  • Applying Formal Methods to a Certifiably Secure Software System

    C.L. Heitmeyer;M.M. Archer;E.I. Leonard;J.D. McLean

  • Software Cost Reduction

    Constance L. Heitmeyer

  • Tools for formal specification, verification, and validation of requirements

    C. Heitmeyer;J. Kirby;B. Labaw

  • Automatic generation of state invariants from requirements specifications

    Ralph Jeffords;Constance Heitmeyer

  • Formal specification and verification of data separation in a separation kernel for an embedded system

    Constance L. Heitmeyer;Myla Archer;Elizabeth I. Leonard;John McLean

  • Tools for constructing requirements specifications: the SCR Toolset at the age of nine.

    Constance L. Heitmeyer;Myla Archer;Ramesh Bharadwaj;Ralph D. Jeffords

  • Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits

    James A. Ballas;Constance L. Heitmeyer;Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones

  • TAME: A PVS Interface to Simplify Proofs for Automata Models

    Myla Archer;Constance Heitmeyer;Steve Sims

Frequent Co-Authors

James T. Kirby
James T. Kirby University of Delaware
Tevfik Bultan
Tevfik Bultan University of California, Santa Barbara
Sandeep K. Shukla
Sandeep K. Shukla International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad
Klaus Pohl
Klaus Pohl University of Duisburg-Essen
David W. Aha
David W. Aha United States Naval Research Laboratory
Jan Jürjens
Jan Jürjens University of Koblenz and Landau
Bernhard Rumpe
Bernhard Rumpe RWTH Aachen University
Kevin Jeffay
Kevin Jeffay University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sjaak Brinkkemper
Sjaak Brinkkemper Utrecht University
J. Gregory Trafton
J. Gregory Trafton United States Naval Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open new doors for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. Today, numerous online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa give students with lower GPAs new opportunities to advance their education.

If you're looking for a faster route, consider enrolling in an accelerated computer science degree online. These programs allow you to complete your studies in less time and quickly gain in-demand tech skills.

Computer Science intersects with other fields, such as environmental sciences and engineering. With an environmental engineer degree online, graduates can contribute to green technology and sustainable solutions. Additionally, there is a wide variety of jobs for environmental science majors that combine computing, research, and environmental advocacy.

Ultimately, studying online makes advanced education more flexible and accessible, while also providing diverse career pathways in computer science and allied disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Constance L. Heitmeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles