World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 55 4388 4264 2048 1975 339 9692

Oleg Sokolsky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oleg Sokolsky between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oleg Sokolsky published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2013. 22 of the 358 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2013. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 8 publications
1994 2025

358 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oleg Sokolsky: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 1
1996 3
1997 6
1998 7
1999 8
2000 4
2001 9
2002 9
2003 7
2004 8
2005 7
2006 19
2007 14
2008 15
2009 17
2010 13
2011 20
2012 15
2013 23
2014 16
2015 16
2016 12
2017 9
2018 14
2019 8
2020 6
2021 15
2022 13
2023 19
2024 14
2025 8
Total 358
Download as CSV

Oleg Sokolsky publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oleg Sokolsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 332–341 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 339 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209 339
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Oleg Sokolsky D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oleg Sokolsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 55
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Oleg Sokolsky is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and has a research focus spanning computer science and engineering disciplines. Their work contributes substantially to subfields such as artificial intelligence, software, control and systems engineering, signal processing, and computational theory and mathematics.

The main topics addressed by Sokolsky include adversarial robustness in machine learning, anomaly detection techniques and applications, fault detection and control systems, software reliability and analysis research, formal methods in verification, advanced malware detection techniques, and software testing and debugging techniques.

Prominent coauthors who have frequently collaborated with Sokolsky are:

  • Insup Lee
  • Ivan Ruchkin
  • James Weimer
  • Matthew Cleaveland
  • Pengyuan Lu

Oleg Sokolsky has frequently published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • 2022 American Control Conference (ACC)
  • ACM Computing Surveys

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Sokolsky include:

  • Real-time Attack-recovery for Cyber-physical Systems Using Linear-quadratic Regulator, 2021, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • iDECODe: In-Distribution Equivariance for Conformal Out-of-Distribution Detection, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Improving Neural Network Robustness via Persistency of Excitation, 2022, 2022 American Control Conference (ACC)
  • Detecting OODs as datapoints with High Uncertainty, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Recovery from Adversarial Attacks in Cyber-physical Systems: Shallow, Deep, and Exploratory Works, 2024, ACM Computing Surveys

Sokolsky has also authored books published by Springer Science+Business Media, including Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (2020) and NASA Formal Methods (2022).

Best Publications

  • Challenges and Research Directions in Medical Cyber–Physical Systems

    Insup Lee;O. Sokolsky;Sanjian Chen;J. Hatcliff

  • Java-MaC: A Run-Time Assurance Approach for Java Programs

    Moonzoo Kim;Mahesh Viswanathan;Sampath Kannan;Insup Lee

  • Robustness of Attack-Resilient State Estimators

    Miroslav Pajic;James Weimer;Nicola Bezzo;Paulo Tabuada

  • Java-MaC: A Run-time Assurance Tool for Java Programs

    Moonjoo Kim;Sampath Kannan;Insup Lee;Oleg Sokolsky

  • Runtime Assurance Based On Formal Specifications

    Insup Lee;Sampath Kannan;Moonjoo Kim;Oleg Sokolsky

  • Hierarchical modeling and analysis of embedded systems

    R. Alur;Thao Dang;J. Esposito;Yerang Hur

  • Medical cyber physical systems

    Insup Lee;Oleg Sokolsky

  • A Temporal Logic Based Theory of Test Coverage and Generation

    Hyoung Seok Hong;Insup Lee;Oleg Sokolsky;Hasan Ural

  • Formally specified monitoring of temporal properties

    Moonjoo Kim;M. Viswanathan;H. Ben-Abdallah;S. Kannan

  • Toward patient safety in closed-loop medical device systems

    David Arney;Miroslav Pajic;Julian M. Goldman;Insup Lee

  • Data flow testing as model checking

    Hyoung Seok Hong;Sung Deok Cha;Insup Lee;Oleg Sokolsky

  • Design and Implementation of Attack-Resilient Cyberphysical Systems: With a Focus on Attack-Resilient State Estimators

    Miroslav Pajic;James Weimer;Nicola Bezzo;Oleg Sokolsky

  • Hierarchical Hybrid Modeling of Embedded Systems

    Rajeev Alur;Thao Dang;Joel M. Esposito;Rafael B. Fierro

  • Model-Driven Safety Analysis of Closed-Loop Medical Systems

    Miroslav Pajic;Rahul Mangharam;Oleg Sokolsky;David Arney

  • Real-time multi-core virtual machine scheduling in xen

    Sisu Xi;Meng Xu;Chenyang Lu;Linh T. X. Phan

  • Verisim: formal analysis of network simulations

    K. Bhargavan;C.A. Gunter;Moonjoo Kim;Insup Lee

  • Weak Bisimulation for Probabilistic Systems

    Anna Philippou;Insup Lee;Oleg Sokolsky

  • Incremental Model Checking in the Modal Mu-Calculus

    Oleg Sokolsky;Scott A. Smolka

  • Schedulability analysis of AADL models

    Oleg Sokolsky;Insup Lee;Duncan Clarke

  • Specification-based testing with linear temporal logic

    L. Tan;O. Sokolsky;I. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Insup Lee
Insup Lee University of Pennsylvania
Sampath Kannan
Sampath Kannan University of Pennsylvania
Miroslav Pajic
Miroslav Pajic Duke University
George J. Pappas
George J. Pappas University of Pennsylvania
Mahesh Viswanathan
Mahesh Viswanathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Scott A. Smolka
Scott A. Smolka Stony Brook University
Mats P. E. Heimdahl
Mats P. E. Heimdahl University of Minnesota
Rajeev Alur
Rajeev Alur University of Pennsylvania
Boon Thau Loo
Boon Thau Loo University of Pennsylvania
Chenyang Lu
Chenyang Lu Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up numerous career possibilities, but it’s worth considering how online degrees can expand your options. Many students are now pursuing affordable master's degrees online to develop advanced technical skills while keeping costs manageable. This flexibility is particularly valuable if you’re looking to specialize or change fields.

Beyond core Computer Science, other disciplines offer exciting intersections. For example, a online executive mba cost is an important consideration for tech professionals aiming for leadership roles. Understanding business fundamentals can fast-track your move into management positions.

Tech-savvy graduates might also find opportunities with a master in library science, blending digital technologies with information management. Likewise, those with a passion for leading change can discover career advancement with affordable doctoral programs in leadership.

Exploring these related online degree programs can open new doors, broaden your expertise, and create flexible, cost-effective pathways to long-term career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Oleg Sokolsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles