World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 44 7632 7412 100 100 282 7181

Bo An publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bo An between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bo An published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 19 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2025. 84 of the 418 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2025. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 48 publications
2004 2025

418 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bo An: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 4
2009 5
2010 8
2011 10
2012 16
2013 9
2014 13
2015 12
2016 20
2017 31
2018 25
2019 25
2020 35
2021 28
2022 36
2023 44
2024 36
2025 48
Total 418
Download as CSV

Bo An publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bo An sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 282 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 282
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Bo An D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bo An sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 44
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bo An is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, Economics and Econometrics, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist's research topics focus on various advanced areas such as:

  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Artificial Intelligence in Games

Bo An has published extensively, with prominent publications appearing in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Anoikis-Associated Lung Cancer Metastasis: Mechanisms and Therapies" (2022) published in Cancers
  • "Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalization" (2022) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularization" (2020) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Personalized Adaptive Meta Learning for Cold-start User Preference Prediction" (2021) published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Trading" (2023) published in ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

Bo An has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Xinrun Wang, Hongxin Wei, Lei Feng, Youzhi Zhang, and Rundong Wang. These collaborations have contributed to their wide range of published works and breadth of research interests.

In addition to journal and conference papers, Bo An has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Springer Science+Business Media:

  • "Intelligent Information Processing XI" (2022)

Best Publications

  • Combating Noisy Labels by Agreement: A Joint Training Method with Co-Regularization

    Hongxin Wei;Lei Feng;Xiangyu Chen;Bo An

  • PROTECT: a deployed game theoretic system to protect the ports of the United States

    Eric Shieh;Bo An;Rong Yang;Milind Tambe

  • Optimal Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Station Placement Based on Game Theoretical Framework

    Yanhai Xiong;Jiarui Gan;Bo An;Chunyan Miao

  • Automated negotiation with decommitment for dynamic resource allocation in cloud computing

    Bo An;Victor Lesser;David Irwin;Michael Zink

  • POI2Vec: Geographical Latent Representation for Predicting Future Visitors

    Shanshan Feng;Gao Cong;Bo An;Yeow Meng Chee

  • Deploying PAWS: field optimization of the protection assistant for wildlife security

    Fei Fang;Thanh H. Nguyen;Rob Pickles;Wai Y. Lam

  • Stackelberg security games: Looking beyond a decade of success

    Arunesh Sinha;Fei Fang;Bo An;Christopher Kiekintveld

  • Can Cross Entropy Loss Be Robust to Label Noise

    Lei Feng;Senlin Shu;Zhuoyi Lin;Fengmao Lv

  • Partial Label Learning with Self-Guided Retraining

    Lei Feng;Bo An

  • GUARDS and PROTECT: next generation applications of security games

    Bo An;James Pita;Eric Shieh;Milind Tambe

  • Strategic agents for multi-resource negotiation

    Bo An;Victor Lesser;Kwang Mong Sim

  • A Deployed Quantal Response-Based Patrol Planning System for the U.S. Coast Guard

    Bo An;Fernando Ordóñez;Milind Tambe;Eric Shieh

  • Multiagent Reinforcement Learning With Unshared Value Functions

    Yujing Hu;Yang Gao;Bo An

  • Accurate Text-Enhanced Knowledge Graph Representation Learning

    Unknown

  • Challenges and Opportunities for Trust Management in Crowdsourcing

    Han Yu;Zhiqi Shen;Chunyan Miao;Bo An

  • Leveraging Latent Label Distributions for Partial Label Learning.

    Lei Feng;Bo An

  • Security games with limited surveillance

    Bo An;David Kempe;Christopher Kiekintveld;Eric Shieh

  • Refinement of strong stackelberg equilibria in security games

    Bo An;Milind Tambe;Fernando Ordonez;Eric Shieh

  • Computing solutions in infinite-horizon discounted adversarial patrolling games

    Yevgeniy Vorobeychik;Bo An;Milind Tambe;Satinder Singh

  • Toward Efficient Team Formation for Crowdsourcing in Noncooperative Social Networks

    Wanyuan Wang;Jiuchuan Jiang;Bo An;Yichuan Jiang

  • Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learning

    Lei Feng;Jiaqi Lv;Bo Han;Miao Xu

  • Measuring the Distance Between Finite Markov Decision Processes

    Jinhua Song;Yang Gao;Hao Wang;Bo An

Frequent Co-Authors

Milind Tambe
Milind Tambe Harvard University
Chunyan Miao
Chunyan Miao Nanyang Technological University
Victor Lesser
Victor Lesser University of Massachusetts Amherst
Zhiqi Shen
Zhiqi Shen Nanyang Technological University
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Yevgeniy Vorobeychik Washington University in St. Louis
Christopher Kiekintveld
Christopher Kiekintveld The University of Texas at El Paso
Tao Qin
Tao Qin Microsoft (United States)
Han Yu
Han Yu Nanyang Technological University
Yang Gao
Yang Gao Google (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right online computer science program in the USA depends on your academic background and career ambitions. Many students are searching for the cheapest online college options to reduce tuition costs while still earning a respected degree. These affordable programs can make your education more accessible without compromising quality.

If you have faced academic hurdles in the past, there are also excellent universities for low gpa that provide opportunities for students to prove themselves and succeed in competitive fields like computer science.

Interested in diversified job prospects? Explore how an online degree can open doors to high-paying jobs with environmental science degree programs—an exciting alternative pathway for those drawn to technology and the environment.

For those eager to fast-track their careers, consider an accelerated cs degree. These rigorous programs enable you to graduate sooner and get started in this rapidly expanding industry.

Best Scientists Citing Bo An

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles