World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17056 16036 642 620 598 24901

Jose Ps. Henriques publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jose Ps. Henriques between 1950 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jose Ps. Henriques published across 77 years, from 1950 to 2026, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2018. 26 of the 695 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2018. 1950: 1 publication 1951: 2 publications 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 12 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 47 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 48 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 59 publications 2019: 43 publications 2020: 56 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 41 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 42 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 1 publication
1950 2026

695 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jose Ps. Henriques: publications per year, 1950 to 2026
Year Publications
1950 1
1951 2
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 12
2004 4
2005 5
2006 10
2007 11
2008 13
2009 22
2010 47
2011 16
2012 27
2013 48
2014 32
2015 15
2016 37
2017 42
2018 59
2019 43
2020 56
2021 41
2022 41
2023 34
2024 42
2025 25
2026 1
Total 695
Download as CSV

Jose Ps. Henriques publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose Ps. Henriques sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 598 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 598
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jose Ps. Henriques D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose Ps. Henriques sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jose Ps. Henriques is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has a prolific publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their research spans subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, and Emergency Medicine.

Their frequent publication venues highlight contributions to several leading journals:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Netherlands Heart Journal
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care

Henriques's research topics cover a broad spectrum of cardiovascular medicine themes. Key topics of interest include:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Among recent published papers, the following stand out for their focus and publication impact:

  • "Early Extracorporeal CPR for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest," 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Machine learning-based prediction of adverse events following an acute coronary syndrome (PRAISE): a modelling study of pooled datasets," 2021, The Lancet
  • "Global Chronic Total Occlusion Crossing Algorithm," 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis," 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Coronary Angiography After Cardiac Arrest Without ST Segment Elevation," 2020, JAMA Cardiology

Henriques collaborates extensively with several researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Bimmer E. Claessen
  • Alexander P. J. Vlaar
  • Paul Knaapen
  • Anna van Veelen
  • Wouter J. Kikkert

Best Publications

  • A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.

    William W. O'Neill;Neal S. Kleiman;Jeffrey Moses;Jose P.S. Henriques

  • Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Dagmar M. Ouweneel;Erlend Eriksen;Krischan D. Sjauw;Ivo M. van Dongen

  • Exenatide reduces infarct size and improves cardiac function in a porcine model of ischemia and reperfusion injury.

    Leo Timmers;José P.S. Henriques;Dominique P.V. de Kleijn;J. Hans DeVries

  • Angiographic Assessment of Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction by Myocardial Blush Grade

    Jose P.S. Henriques;Felix Zijlstra;Arnoud W.J. van ‘t Hof;Menko-Jan de Boer

  • Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

    Benedikt Schrage;Karim Ibrahim;Tobias Loehn;Nikos Werner

  • Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation

    Jorrit S. Lemkes;Gladys N. Janssens;Nina W. van der Hoeven;Lucia S. D. Jewbali

  • Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI

    Joanna J. Wykrzykowska;Robin P. Kraak;Sjoerd H. Hofma;Rene J. van der Schaaf

  • Plaque Instability Frequently Occurs Days or Weeks Before Occlusive Coronary Thrombosis. A Pathological Thrombectomy Study in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Saskia Z.H. Rittersma;Allard C. van der Wal;Karel T. Koch;Jan J. Piek

  • A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience

    Simon R. Dixon;José P.S. Henriques;Laura Mauri;Krischan Sjauw

  • Guiding Principles for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Global Expert Consensus Document

    Emmanouil S. Brilakis;Kambis Mashayekhi;Etsuo Tsuchikane;Nidal Abi Rafeh

  • Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support With the Impella 2.5 Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock - Results of the Impella EUROSHOCK-Registry

    Alexander Lauten;Annemarie E. Engström;Christian Jung;Klaus Empen

  • Physiological Basis and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Coronary Stenoses of Intermediate Severity

    Tim P. van de Hoef;Martijn A. van Lavieren;Peter Damman;Ronak Delewi

  • Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With STEMI: The EXPLORE Trial

    José P.S. Henriques;Loes P. Hoebers;Truls Råmunddal;Peep Laanmets

  • Long-Term Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusions

    Roxana Mehran;Bimmer E. Claessen;Cosmo Godino;George D. Dangas

  • Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Holger Thiele;Alexander Jobs;Dagmar M Ouweneel;Jose P S Henriques

  • Familial sudden death is an important risk factor for primary ventricular fibrillation: a case-control study in acute myocardial infarction patients.

    Lukas R.C. Dekker;Connie R. Bezzina;José P.S. Henriques;Michael W. Tanck

  • Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5.

    José P.S. Henriques;Maurice Remmelink;Jan Baan;René J. van der Schaaf

  • Prognostic impact of a chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct-related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 3-year results from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.

    Bimmer E Claessen;George D Dangas;Giora Weisz;Bernhard Witzenbichler

  • Evaluation of the Effect of a Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusion on Long-Term Mortality and Left Ventricular Function in Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Bimmer E.P.M. Claessen;René J. van der Schaaf;Niels J. Verouden;Nienke K. Stegenga

  • Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device: The Europella Registry

    Krischan D. Sjauw;Thomas Konorza;Raimund Erbel;Paolo L. Danna

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan J. Piek
Jan J. Piek University of Amsterdam
Robbert J. de Winter
Robbert J. de Winter University of Amsterdam
Adnan Kastrati
Adnan Kastrati Technical University of Munich
Jan G.P. Tijssen
Jan G.P. Tijssen University of Amsterdam
Fernando Alfonso
Fernando Alfonso Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Robert A. Byrne
Robert A. Byrne Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Raimund Erbel
Raimund Erbel University of Duisburg-Essen
Holger Thiele
Holger Thiele Leipzig University
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Christian Hassager
Christian Hassager University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring medical studies in the USA, consider the variety of related online degrees and alternative career pathways in healthcare. Many students pursue programs like direct entry msn programs for non nurses online, which provide a fast track to advanced nursing leadership roles if you have a non-nursing bachelor's degree.

For those new to healthcare, online bsn programs for non nurses offer a convenient pathway to becoming a Registered Nurse. These flexible options are ideal for career changers or those seeking to enter the nursing profession without disrupting their current commitments.

Non-clinical roles are also in high demand. Accredited medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid allow you to train for essential administrative positions supporting healthcare providers.

Some nursing programs also simplify admission requirements. If you're an LPN seeking advancement, consider lpn to rn programs without teas test to transition to an RN role without standardized entrance exams.

Best Scientists Citing Jose Ps. Henriques

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles