World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robbert J. de Winter

Robbert J. de Winter

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
27175
World Ranking
14587
National Ranking
555

Robbert J. de Winter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robbert J. de Winter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 635 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robbert J. de Winter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robbert J. de Winter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robbert J. de Winter is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, with a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine. Within this broad domain, their work concentrates on several subfields, including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Epidemiology.

Their research extensively covers topics such as Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases, and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments.

Robbert J. de Winter has contributed articles to various scientific publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Netherlands Heart Journal
  • European Heart Journal
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • EuroIntervention
  • Cardiovascular revascularization medicine

Recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • Ten-Year All-Cause Death According to Completeness of Revascularization in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study, 2021, Circulation
  • Temporary mechanical circulatory support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials with 6-month follow-up, 2024, The Lancet
  • MiR-223-3p and miR-122-5p as circulating biomarkers for plaque instability, 2020, Open Heart
  • 10-Year All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Heavy Calcification, 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Identification of patients at risk of sudden cardiac death in congenital heart disease: The PRospEctiVE study on implaNTable cardIOverter defibrillator therapy and suddeN cardiac death in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease (PREVENTION-ACHD), 2021, Heart Rhythm

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Joanna J. Wykrzykowska
  • Patrick W. Serruys
  • Yoshinobu Onuma
  • Marcel A.M. Beijk
  • Jan J. Piek

The scope of Robbert J. de Winter's work spans a variety of important cardiovascular issues, addressing diagnostic techniques, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes research. Their contributions to the understanding of coronary artery disease, heart imaging methodologies, and treatment strategies for valvular and myocardial conditions are reflected in their publication record and coauthorships.

Best Publications

  • Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Dagmar M. Ouweneel;Erlend Eriksen;Krischan D. Sjauw;Ivo M. van Dongen

  • Early Invasive Versus Selectively Invasive Management for Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Robbert J. de Winter;Fons Windhausen;Jan Hein Cornel;Peter H.J.M. Dunselman

  • Long-Term Outcome of a Routine Versus Selective Invasive Strategy in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data

    Keith A.A. Fox;Tim C. Clayton;Peter Damman;Stuart J. Pocock

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?

    Krischan D. Sjauw;Annemarie E. Engström;Marije M. Vis;René J. van der Schaaf

  • Darapladib for preventing ischemic events in stable coronary heart disease.

    Harvey D. White;Claes Held;Ralph Stewart;Elizabeth Tarka

  • Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.

    Michelle O'Donoghue;William E Boden;Eugene Braunwald;Christopher P Cannon

  • Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI

    Joanna J. Wykrzykowska;Robin P. Kraak;Sjoerd H. Hofma;Rene J. van der Schaaf

  • Value of Myoglobin, Troponin T, and CK-MBmass in Ruling Out an Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Room

    Robbert J. de Winter;Rudolph W. Koster;Augueste Sturk;Gerard T. Sanders

  • A new ECG sign of proximal LAD occlusion.

    Robbert J de Winter;Niels J W Verouden;Hein J J Wellens;Arthur A M Wilde

  • Plaque Instability Frequently Occurs Days or Weeks Before Occlusive Coronary Thrombosis. A Pathological Thrombectomy Study in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Saskia Z.H. Rittersma;Allard C. van der Wal;Karel T. Koch;Jan J. Piek

  • Saphenous Vein Graft Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Pathophysiology, Management, and Future Directions

    Ralf E. Harskamp;Renato D. Lopes;Clinton E. Baisden;Robbert J. de Winter

  • Physiological Basis and Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Coronary Stenoses of Intermediate Severity

    Tim P. van de Hoef;Martijn A. van Lavieren;Peter Damman;Ronak Delewi

  • Role of Variability in Microvascular Resistance on Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Blood Flow Velocity Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Lesions

    Martijn Meuwissen;Steven A. J. Chamuleau;Maria Siebes;Carl E. Schotborgh

  • Large-Scale Gene-Centric Analysis Identifies Novel Variants for Coronary Artery Disease

    Adam S. Butterworth;Peter S. Braund;Martin Farrall;Robert J. Hardwick

  • Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5.

    José P.S. Henriques;Maurice Remmelink;Jan Baan;René J. van der Schaaf

  • Relationship of thrombus healing to underlying plaque morphology in sudden coronary death.

    Miranda C.A. Kramer;Saskia Z.H. Rittersma;Robbert J. de Winter;Elena R. Ladich

  • Neutrophils, neutrophil extracellular traps and interleukin-17 associate with the organisation of thrombi in acute myocardial infarction.

    Onno J. de Boer;Xiaofei Li;Peter Teeling;Claire Mackaay

  • Evaluation of the Effect of a Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusion on Long-Term Mortality and Left Ventricular Function in Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Bimmer E.P.M. Claessen;René J. van der Schaaf;Niels J. Verouden;Nienke K. Stegenga

  • P-selectin- and CD63-exposing platelet microparticles reflect platelet activation in peripheral arterial disease and myocardial infarction

    P. Marc van der Zee;Éva Biró;Yung Ko;Robbert J. de Winter

  • Effects of the high-density lipoprotein mimetic agent CER-001 on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized trial

    Jean-Claude Tardif;Jean-Claude Tardif;Christie M. Ballantyne;Philip Barter;Jean-Louis Dasseux

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan G.P. Tijssen
Jan G.P. Tijssen University of Amsterdam
Jan J. Piek
Jan J. Piek University of Amsterdam
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Yoshinobu Onuma
Yoshinobu Onuma University of Galway
Pieter A. Doevendans
Pieter A. Doevendans Utrecht University
J. Wouter Jukema
J. Wouter Jukema Leiden University Medical Center
Mitchell W. Krucoff
Mitchell W. Krucoff Duke University
Barbara J.M. Mulder
Barbara J.M. Mulder University of Amsterdam
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways within healthcare. While becoming a physician remains a popular choice, many students are exploring related fields through flexible online healthcare administration degree programs. These programs are ideal for those interested in the business, management, or policy side of healthcare.

For nurses aiming to advance their careers, asn to fnp bridge programs offer an accelerated route to become a Family Nurse Practitioner, merging clinical knowledge with practical patient care.

Nutrition is another growing field with wide applications in clinical, community, and wellness settings. Earning a nutrition degree online can provide foundational knowledge for roles in dietetics, health education, or research.

Aspiring healthcare leaders may also consider one of the best mha programs to develop executive skills vital for managing hospitals and health systems.

Exploring these online options lets you tailor your educational journey—offering flexible pathways to diverse, in-demand healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Robbert J. de Winter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles