World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
8314
World Ranking
10055
National Ranking
4239

Georgios Fainekos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgios Fainekos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 167 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Georgios Fainekos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgios Fainekos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Georgios Fainekos is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research centers primarily on computer science and engineering, with significant contributions spanning specialized subfields such as artificial intelligence, control and systems engineering, computational theory and mathematics, computer vision and pattern recognition, and software.

The main research topics addressed by Georgios Fainekos include:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Their recent published papers illustrate a focus on falsification and control functions, with works appearing in various academic venues. Selected examples include:

  • "ARCH-COMP 2020 Category Report: Falsification", 2020, EPiC series in computing
  • "Safe Navigation in Human Occupied Environments Using Sampling and Control Barrier Functions", 2021, 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • "ARCH-COMP 2021 Category Report: Falsification with Validation of Results", 2021, EPiC series in computing
  • "Risk-Bounded Control Using Stochastic Barrier Functions", 2020, IEEE Control Systems Letters
  • "Part-X: A Family of Stochastic Algorithms for Search-Based Test Generation With Probabilistic Guarantees", 2023, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering

Frequent publication venues for Georgios Fainekos include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • EPiC series in computing
  • IEEE Control Systems Letters
  • ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
  • Lecture notes in computer science

Georgios Fainekos has collaborated extensively with various scholars. Among their most frequent co-authors are:

  • Bardh Hoxha
  • Danil Prokhorov
  • Hideki Okamoto
  • Giulia Pedrielli
  • Keyvan Majd

Best Publications

  • Temporal-Logic-Based Reactive Mission and Motion Planning

    H. Kress-Gazit;G.E. Fainekos;G.J. Pappas

  • Robustness of temporal logic specifications for continuous-time signals

    Georgios E. Fainekos;George J. Pappas

  • S-taliro: a tool for temporal logic falsification for hybrid systems

    Yashwanth Annapureddy;Che Liu;Georgios Fainekos;Sriram Sankaranarayanan

  • Temporal logic motion planning for dynamic robots

    Georgios E. Fainekos;Antoine Girard;Hadas Kress-Gazit;George J. Pappas

  • Specification-Based Monitoring of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Survey on Theory, Tools and Applications

    Ezio Bartocci;Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh;Alexandre Donzé;Georgios Fainekos

  • Temporal Logic Motion Planning for Mobile Robots

    G.E. Fainekos;H. Kress-Gazit;G.J. Pappas

  • Where's Waldo? Sensor-Based Temporal Logic Motion Planning

    H. Kress-Gazit;G.E. Fainekos;G.J. Pappas

  • Hybrid Controllers for Path Planning: A Temporal Logic Approach

    G.E. Fainekos;H. Kress-Gazit;G.J. Pappas

  • Simulation-based Adversarial Test Generation for Autonomous Vehicles with Machine Learning Components

    Cumhur Erkan Tuncali;Georgios Fainekos;Hisahiro Ito;James Kapinski

  • Probabilistic Temporal Logic Falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems

    Houssam Abbas;Georgios Fainekos;Sriram Sankaranarayanan;Franjo Ivančić

  • Translating Structured English to Robot Controllers

    Hadas Kress-Gazit;Georgios E. Fainekos;George J. Pappas

  • On-Line Monitoring for Temporal Logic Robustness

    Adel Dokhanchi;Bardh Hoxha;Georgios E. Fainekos

  • Robust test generation and coverage for hybrid systems

    A. Agung Julius;Georgios E. Fainekos;Madhukar Anand;Insup Lee

  • Monte-carlo techniques for falsification of temporal properties of non-linear hybrid systems

    Truong Nghiem;Sriram Sankaranarayanan;Georgios Fainekos;Franjo Ivancić

  • Falsification of temporal properties of hybrid systems using the cross-entropy method

    Sriram Sankaranarayanan;Georgios Fainekos

  • Robustness of temporal logic specifications

    Georgios E. Fainekos;George J. Pappas

  • Experimental cooperative control of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles

    S. Bayraktar;G.E. Fainekos;G.J. Pappas

  • Verification of automotive control applications using S-TaLiRo

    Georgios E. Fainekos;Sriram Sankaranarayanan;Koichi Ueda;Hakan Yazarel

  • Benchmarks for Temporal Logic Requirements for Automotive Systems

    Bardh Hoxha;Houssam Abbas;Georgios E. Fainekos

  • Mining parametric temporal logic properties in model-based design for cyber-physical systems

    Bardh Hoxha;Adel Dokhanchi;Georgios Fainekos

  • Requirements-Driven Test Generation for Autonomous Vehicles With Machine Learning Components

    Cumhur Erkan Tuncali;Georgios Fainekos;Danil Prokhorov;Hisahiro Ito

Frequent Co-Authors

Sriram Sankaranarayanan
Sriram Sankaranarayanan University of Colorado Boulder
George J. Pappas
George J. Pappas University of Pennsylvania
Franjo Ivancic
Franjo Ivancic Google (United States)
Danil V. Prokhorov
Danil V. Prokhorov Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan)
Antoine Girard
Antoine Girard University of Paris-Saclay
Aarti Gupta
Aarti Gupta Princeton University
Alessandro Abate
Alessandro Abate University of Oxford
Rajesh Gupta
Rajesh Gupta University of California, San Diego
Rupak Majumdar
Rupak Majumdar Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
David M. Maahs
David M. Maahs Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology drives innovation across multiple fields, many students explore related online degrees to broaden their skill sets and career options. Beyond Computer Science, online programs in areas like environmental and mechanical engineering offer both flexibility and affordable education.

Pursuing an accelerated CS degree allows students to fast-track their studies and quickly enter in-demand tech roles. For those interested in environmental topics, an environmental engineering online degree covers skills needed for sustainability, clean energy, and resource management careers.

Students looking for affordable advanced education in engineering can consider the cheapest online master’s mechanical engineering programs. These degrees open doors to fields like robotics, automotive design, and technical consulting.

Graduates in these disciplines can pursue a wide range of opportunities—explore the diverse jobs for environmental science majors to see how interdisciplinary skills can lead to meaningful, impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Georgios Fainekos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles