World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ezio Bartocci

Ezio Bartocci

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5110
World Ranking
9886
National Ranking
87

Ezio Bartocci publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ezio Bartocci sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ezio Bartocci D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ezio Bartocci sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ezio Bartocci is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and focuses on research within the field of computer science, with over 240 publications. Their work encompasses various subfields including artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, software, computer networks and communications, and control and systems engineering.

The main topics addressed in Bartocci's research include:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Bartocci has a substantial publication record in several venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Formal Methods in System Design
  • ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • Information and Computation

Among the noteworthy papers authored or co-authored by Bartocci are:

  • "Survey on mining signal temporal logic specifications," 2022, Information and Computation
  • "CPSDebug: Automatic failure explanation in CPS models," 2021, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • "A formal methods approach to pattern synthesis in reaction diffusion systems," 2020, OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)
  • "A Novel Spatial-Temporal Specification-Based Monitoring System for Smart Cities," 2021, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • "DeepSTL," 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering

Bartocci's collaborative research includes frequent co-authors such as Dejan Ničković, Marcel Moosbrugger, Laura Kovács, Miroslav Stankovič, and Efstathia Bura, with collaboration counts ranging from 9 to 29 joint works.

In addition to journal and conference papers, Bartocci has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Springer Science+Business Media: Formal Methods in Outer Space (2021).

Best Publications

  • Specification-Based Monitoring of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Survey on Theory, Tools and Applications

    Ezio Bartocci;Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh;Alexandre Donzé;Georgios Fainekos

  • Introduction to runtime verification

    Ezio Bartocci;Yliès Falcone;Adrian Francalanza;Giles Reger

  • Computational Modeling, Formal Analysis, and Tools for Systems Biology

    Ezio Bartocci;Pietro Lió

  • Model repair for probabilistic systems

    Ezio Bartocci;Radu Grosu;Panagiotis Katsaros;C. R. Ramakrishnan

  • Runtime verification with state estimation

    Scott D. Stoller;Ezio Bartocci;Justin Seyster;Radu Grosu

  • A Roadmap Toward the Resilient Internet of Things for Cyber-Physical Systems

    Denise Ratasich;Faiq Khalid;Florian Geissler;Radu Grosu

  • SpaTeL: a novel spatial-temporal logic and its applications to networked systems

    Iman Haghighi;Austin Jones;Zhaodan Kong;Ezio Bartocci

  • From cardiac cells to genetic regulatory networks

    Radu Grosu;Gregory Batt;Flavio H. Fenton;James Glimm

  • Data-Driven Statistical Learning of Temporal Logic Properties

    Ezio Bartocci;Luca Bortolussi;Guido Sanguinetti

  • On temporal logic and signal processing

    Alexandre Donzé;Oded Maler;Ezio Bartocci;Dejan Nickovic

  • Lectures on Runtime Verification: Introductory and Advanced Topics

    Ezio Bartocci;Yliès Falcone

  • Learning and detecting emergent behavior in networks of cardiac myocytes

    Radu Grosu;Scott A. Smolka;Flavio Corradini;Anita Wasilewska

  • System design of stochastic models using robustness of temporal properties

    Ezio Bartocci;Luca Bortolussi;Luca Bortolussi;Laura Nenzi;Guido Sanguinetti

  • Quantitative monitoring of STL with edit distance

    Stefan Jakšić;Stefan Jakšić;Ezio Bartocci;Radu Grosu;Thang Nguyen

  • A survey of challenges for runtime verification from advanced application domains (beyond software)

    César Sánchez;Gerardo Schneider;Wolfgang Ahrendt;Ezio Bartocci

  • First international Competition on Runtime Verification: rules, benchmarks, tools, and final results of CRV 2014

    Ezio Bartocci;Yliès Falcone;Yliès Falcone;Borzoo Bonakdarpour;Christian Colombo

  • Monitoring mobile and spatially distributed cyber-physical systems

    Ezio Bartocci;Luca Bortolussi;Michele Loreti;Laura Nenzi

  • Toward real-time simulation of cardiac dynamics

    E. Bartocci;E. M. Cherry;J. Glimm;R. Grosu

  • Adaptive Runtime Verification

    Ezio Bartocci;Radu Grosu;Atul Karmarkar;Scott A. Smolka

  • BioWMS: a web-based Workflow Management System for bioinformatics.

    Ezio Bartocci;Flavio Corradini;Emanuela Merelli;Lorenzo Scortichini

Frequent Co-Authors

Radu Grosu
Radu Grosu TU Wien
Scott A. Smolka
Scott A. Smolka Stony Brook University
Guido Sanguinetti
Guido Sanguinetti International School for Advanced Studies
John A. Stankovic
John A. Stankovic University of Virginia
James Glimm
James Glimm Stony Brook University
Calin Belta
Calin Belta Boston University
Joost-Pieter Katoen
Joost-Pieter Katoen RWTH Aachen University
Thomas A. Henzinger
Thomas A. Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Leonardo Mariani
Leonardo Mariani University of Milano-Bicocca
Pietro Liò
Pietro Liò University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens many doors to flexible online education and fast-tracked career opportunities. Whether you’re aiming for a foundational or advanced role, online programs now offer quick, affordable, and respected options. For those just starting out, 1 year associate degree programs online offer a fast entry into the technology sector.

Certification can also be a smart move for career advancement. There are easy certifications to get online that boost your earning potential and make your resume stand out, often requiring less time than a full degree.

For those interested in graduate education, many institutions now offer the quickest cheapest masters degree programs, allowing you to upskill on your own schedule and potentially finish in as little as one year.

Not sure which degree holds the most value? It’s worth exploring the most useful masters degrees tailored to fast-growing fields and high-demand skills. Choosing the right online pathway can help you accelerate your tech career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Ezio Bartocci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles