World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
7690
World Ranking
7993
National Ranking
476

Sotirios A. Tsaftaris publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sotirios A. Tsaftaris sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 271 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sotirios A. Tsaftaris D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sotirios A. Tsaftaris sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sotirios A. Tsaftaris is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across multiple domains within computer science and medicine, focusing primarily on artificial intelligence and medical imaging.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

Their work extensively covers several subfields, notably:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Health Informatics
  • Plant Science

Key research topics addressed throughout their career consist of:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • AI in cancer detection
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Sotirios A. Tsaftaris has contributed to a number of publications including peer-reviewed journal articles and books. Some notable recent papers include:

  • "AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions" (2020), published in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • "Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation" (2024), published in Nature Methods
  • "Causal machine learning for healthcare and precision medicine" (2022), published in Royal Society Open Science
  • "Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation" (2024), published in Nature Methods
  • "DiCyc: GAN-based deformation invariant cross-domain information fusion for medical image synthesis" (2020), published in Information Fusion

The scientist has published books with Springer Science+Business Media, including titles such as:

  • "Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer, and Affordable Healthcare and AI for Resource Diverse Global Health" (2021)
  • "Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer" (2022)
  • "Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer" (2023)
  • "Medical Applications with Disentanglements" (2023)

Frequently collaborating co-authors include:

  • Alison Q. O'Neil
  • Pedro Sanchez
  • Spyridon Thermos
  • Tal Arbel
  • Brennan Nichyporuk

The scientist's publications often appear in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Best Publications

  • AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions

    Andreas S. Panayides;Amir Amini;Nenad D. Filipovic;Ashish Sharma

  • Multi-Centre, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation: The M&Ms Challenge.

    Víctor M. Campello;Polyxeni Gkontra;Cristian Izquierdo;Carlos Martín-Isla

  • Multimodal MR Synthesis via Modality-Invariant Latent Representation

    Agisilaos Chartsias;Thomas Joyce;Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Finely-grained annotated datasets for image-based plant phenotyping

    Massimo Minervini;Andreas Fischbach;Hanno Scharr;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Leaf segmentation in plant phenotyping: a collation study

    Hanno Scharr;Massimo Minervini;Andrew P. French;Christian Klukas

  • 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING

    E. Soyak;Sotirios Tsaftaris;A. K. Katsaggelos

  • Anomalous video event detection using spatiotemporal context

    Fan Jiang;Junsong Yuan;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris;Aggelos K. Katsaggelos

  • Image Analysis: The New Bottleneck in Plant Phenotyping [Applications Corner]

    Massimo Minervini;Hanno Scharr;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING

    E. Soyak;Sotirios Tsaftaris;A. K. Katsaggelos

  • Causal machine learning for healthcare and precision medicine

    Unknown

  • Adversarial Image Synthesis for Unpaired Multi-modal Cardiac Data

    Agisilaos Chartsias;Thomas Joyce;Rohan Dharmakumar;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Learning to Segment From Scribbles Using Multi-Scale Adversarial Attention Gates

    Gabriele Valvano;Andrea Leo;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Disentangled representation learning in cardiac image analysis.

    Agisilaos Chartsias;Thomas Joyce;Giorgos Papanastasiou;Scott Semple

  • Image Analysis: The New Bottleneck in Plant Phenotyping

    Massimo Minervini;Hanno Scharr;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Machine Learning for Plant Phenotyping Needs Image Processing

    Sotirios A. Tsaftaris;Massimo Minervini;Hanno Scharr

  • Image-based plant phenotyping with incremental learning and active contours

    Massimo Minervini;Mohammed M. Abdelsamea;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Disentangle, Align and Fuse for Multimodal and Semi-Supervised Image Segmentation

    Agisilaos Chartsias;Giorgos Papanastasiou;Chengjia Wang;Scott Semple

  • Phenotiki: an open software and hardware platform for affordable and easy image‐based phenotyping of rosette‐shaped plants

    Massimo Minervini;Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Pierdomenico Perata;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Learning to Count Leaves in Rosette Plants

    Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Massimo Minervini;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging

    Alejandro F. Frangi;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris;Jerry L. Prince

  • DiCyc: GAN-based deformation invariant cross-domain information fusion for medical image synthesis.

    Chengjia Wang;Guang Yang;Giorgos Papanastasiou;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Leveraging Multiple Datasets for Deep Leaf Counting

    Andrei Dobrescu;Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Pheno-Deep Counter: a unified and versatile deep learning architecture for leaf counting.

    Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Peter Doerner;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • ARIGAN: Synthetic Arabidopsis Plants Using Generative Adversarial Network

    Mario Valerio Giuffrida;Hanno Scharr;Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

  • Statistical Shape Modeling of the Left Ventricle: Myocardial Infarct Classification Challenge

    Avan Suinesiaputra;Pierre Ablin;Xenia Alba;Martino Alessandrini

  • 2011 18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP)

    E. Soyak;Sotirios Tsaftaris;A. K. Katsaggelos

Frequent Co-Authors

Aggelos K. Katsaggelos
Aggelos K. Katsaggelos Northwestern University
Piotr J. Slomka
Piotr J. Slomka Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Damini Dey
Damini Dey Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
David E. Newby
David E. Newby University of Edinburgh
Matthias G. Friedrich
Matthias G. Friedrich McGill University
Michael G. Strintzis
Michael G. Strintzis Information Technologies Institute, Greece
Alessandro Gozzi
Alessandro Gozzi Italian Institute of Technology
Tony P. Pridmore
Tony P. Pridmore University of Nottingham
Angelo Bifone
Angelo Bifone University of Turin
Bjoern H. Menze
Bjoern H. Menze University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech professionals grows, many students look for flexible and affordable ways to boost their credentials. If you're interested in expanding beyond traditional Computer Science, several related online degrees offer both specialized knowledge and versatile career pathways.

For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, a fast track computer science degree can shorten the journey to a tech career by allowing you to complete your studies in less time. If your interests include sustainability and technological solutions to environmental issues, consider exploring environmental engineering schools online for a blend of science, engineering, and environmental studies.

Engineering remains a top-driven field, with a strong need for innovation in mechanical design and manufacturing. A flexible online degree for mechanical engineering can open doors to industries like automotive, aerospace, and robotics. Additionally, those passionate about scientific theory and advanced problem-solving should explore an online physics degree for career options in research, engineering, and data science.

These online programs provide diverse pathways to technical and STEM careers, letting you tailor your education to match your interests and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Sotirios A. Tsaftaris

Trending Scientists