World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
44637
World Ranking
6724
National Ranking
3549

Dianna M. Milewicz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianna M. Milewicz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 439 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Dianna M. Milewicz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianna M. Milewicz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Dianna M. Milewicz is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. The research work centers predominantly on medical and molecular biology fields, with significant attention to pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, genetics, and surgery.

The core research topics include:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Connective tissue disorders research
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
  • Congenital heart defects research

Dianna M. Milewicz has contributed to numerous publications with recent notable papers including:

  • 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines (2022) in Circulation
  • 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease (2022) in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Marfan syndrome (2021) in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes (2021) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Targeting the NLRP3 Inflammasome With Inhibitor MCC950 Prevents Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections in Mice (2020) in Journal of the American Heart Association

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Siddharth K. Prakash
  • Dongchuan Guo
  • Alana C. Cecchi
  • Callie Kwartler
  • Alan C. Braverman

Research findings are commonly published in venues such as:

  • Circulation
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Seminars in Vascular Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Dianna M. Milewicz has received recognition as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: Executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines, american association for thoracic surgery, american college of radiology, american stroke association

    Loren F. Hiratzka;George L. Bakris;Joshua A. Beckman;Robert M. Bersin

  • The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome

    Bart L Loeys;Harry C Dietz;Alan C Braverman;Bert L Callewaert

  • 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease

    Loren F. Hiratzka;George L. Bakris;Joshua A. Beckman;Robert M. Bersin

  • Aneurysm Syndromes Caused by Mutations in the TGF-β Receptor

    Bart L. Loeys;Bart L. Loeys;Ulrike Schwarze;Tammy Holm;Bert L. Callewaert

  • Mutations in smooth muscle α-actin ( ACTA2 ) lead to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections

    Dong Chuan Guo;Hariyadarshi Pannu;Van Tran-Fadulu;Christina L. Papke

  • Mutations in Smooth Muscle Alpha-Actin (ACTA2) Cause Coronary Artery Disease, Stroke, and Moyamoya Disease, Along with Thoracic Aortic Disease

    Dong Chuan Guo;Christina L. Papke;Van Tran-Fadulu;Ellen S. Regalado

  • Treatment of aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome.

    Dianna M. Milewicz;Harry C. Dietz;D. Craig Miller

  • The molecular genetics of Marfan syndrome and related disorders

    Peter N. Robinson;E. Arteaga-Solis;C. Baldock;G. Collod-Béroud

  • An adventitial IL-6/MCP1 amplification loop accelerates macrophage-mediated vascular inflammation leading to aortic dissection in mice

    Brian C. Tieu;Chang Lee;Hong Sun;Wanda LeJeune

  • Genetic Basis of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections: Focus on Smooth Muscle Cell Contractile Dysfunction

    Milewicz Dm;Guo Dc;Tran-Fadulu;Lafont Al

  • Mutations in Transforming Growth Factor-β Receptor Type II Cause Familial Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections

    Hariyadarshi Pannu;Van Tran Fadulu;Jessica Chang;Andrea Lafont

  • Marfan syndrome. Long-term survival and complications after aortic aneurysm repair

    R. Finkbohner;D. Johnston;E. S. Crawford;J. Coselli

  • Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Identifying Knowledge Gaps and Rising to the Challenge From the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon)

    Hector I. Michelena;Siddharth K. Prakash;Alessandro Della Corte;Malenka M. Bissell

  • TGFB2 mutations cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections associated with mild systemic features of Marfan syndrome.

    Catherine Boileau;Dong Chuan Guo;Nadine Hanna;Ellen S. Regalado

  • Characterization of the inflammatory and apoptotic cells in the aortas of patients with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections.

    Rumin He;Dong Chuan Guo;Anthony L. Estrera;Hazim J. Safi

  • Genetics of Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Diseases

    Amélie Pinard;Gregory T. Jones;Dianna M. Milewicz

  • Role of Mechanotransduction in Vascular Biology: Focus on Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections

    Jay D. Humphrey;Martin A. Schwartz;George Tellides;Dianna M. Milewicz

  • Marfan syndrome : defective synthesis, secretion, and extracellular matrix formation of fibrillin by cultured dermal fibroblasts

    D M Milewicz;R E Pyeritz;E S Crawford;P H Byers

  • Mutations in Myosin Light Chain Kinase Cause Familial Aortic Dissections

    Li Wang;Dongchuan Guo;Jiumei Cao;Limin Gong

  • 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease: Executive Summary

    Loren F. Hiratzka;George L. Bakris;Joshua A. Beckman;Robert M. Bersin

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott A. LeMaire
Scott A. LeMaire Baylor College of Medicine
Joseph S. Coselli
Joseph S. Coselli Baylor College of Medicine
Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Reed E. Pyeritz
Reed E. Pyeritz University of Pennsylvania
Suzanne M. Leal
Suzanne M. Leal Columbia University Medical Center
Hazim J. Safi
Hazim J. Safi The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Harry C. Dietz
Harry C. Dietz Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Deborah A. Nickerson
Deborah A. Nickerson University of Washington
Catherine Boileau
Catherine Boileau Université Paris Cité
Richard B. Devereux
Richard B. Devereux Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens the door to a variety of related healthcare degrees and professions, many of which can be started or advanced through flexible online programs. For those seeking direct patient care roles, lpn to rn programs without teas test provide a pathway to becoming a registered nurse without the barrier of additional entrance exams.

If you are interested in the leadership or operational side of healthcare, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online can equip you with the skills to manage medical facilities, often at a faster pace than traditional programs.

Nurses with an associate degree can take their education and scope of practice further by enrolling in programs such as the adn to fnp bridge, which enables a transition from nursing practice to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner.

For those passionate about health and wellness, an online bachelor's in nutrition can be a great choice, leading to roles in clinical nutrition, counseling, or public health. Each of these online options offers flexible entry points to fulfilling and impactful healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Dianna M. Milewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles