World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eric M. Isselbacher

Eric M. Isselbacher

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
42437
World Ranking
11563
National Ranking
5934

Eric M. Isselbacher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric M. Isselbacher sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 346 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eric M. Isselbacher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric M. Isselbacher sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric M. Isselbacher is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has a prolific publication record primarily in the field of Medicine with a focus on pulmonary, cardiovascular, and surgical studies.

Their research covers multiple subfields, including:

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Epidemiology

Key topics addressed in their work include:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy

Eric M. Isselbacher has been involved in notable publications such as:

  • 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines (2022, Circulation)
  • 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease (2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Wearable Devices for Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring (2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Early Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection (2022, JAMA Cardiology)
  • State-of-the-Art Machine Learning Techniques Aiming to Improve Patient Outcomes Pertaining to the Cardiovascular System (2020, Journal of the American Heart Association)

The scientist frequently publishes in several distinguished venues, including:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • JACC Case Reports
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • JAMA Cardiology

Collaborations form an important part of their scholarly activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Kim A. Eagle
  • Derek R. Brinster
  • Alan C. Braverman
  • Kevin M. Harris
  • Antonis A. Armoundas

Best Publications

  • The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.

    Peter G. Hagan;Christoph A. Nienaber;Eric M. Isselbacher;David Bruckman

  • 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: Executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines, american association for thoracic surgery, american college of radiology, american stroke association

    Loren F. Hiratzka;George L. Bakris;Joshua A. Beckman;Robert M. Bersin

  • 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease

    Loren F. Hiratzka;George L. Bakris;Joshua A. Beckman;Robert M. Bersin

  • Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

    Eric M. Isselbacher

  • Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Acute Aortic Dissection: 17-Year Trends From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

    Linda A. Pape;Mazen Awais;Elise M. Woznicki;Toru Suzuki

  • Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: A 20-Year Experience of Collaborative Clinical Research.

    Arturo Evangelista;Eric M. Isselbacher;Eduardo Bossone;Thomas G. Gleason

  • Long-Term Survival in Patients Presenting With Type B Acute Aortic Dissection Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

    Thomas T. Tsai;Rossella Fattori;Santi Trimarchi;Eric Isselbacher

  • Aortic Diameter ≥5.5 cm Is Not a Good Predictor of Type A Aortic Dissection Observations From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

    Linda A. Pape;Thomas T. Tsai;Eric M. Isselbacher;Jae K. Oh

  • Clinical profiles and outcomes of acute type B aortic dissection in the current era: Lessons from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

    Toru Suzuki;Rajendra H. Mehta;Hüseyin Ince;Ryozo Nagai

  • Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection.

    Thomas T Tsai;Arturo Evangelista;Christoph A Nienaber;Truls Myrmel

  • Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience.

    Santi Trimarchi;Christoph A. Nienaber;Vincenzo Rampoldi;Truls Myrmel

  • Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: From the American society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging: Endorsed by the society of cardiovascular computed tomography and society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    Steven A. Goldstein;Arturo Evangelista;Suhny Abbara;Andrew Arai

  • Cocaine-Related Aortic Dissection in Perspective

    Kim A. Eagle;Eric M. Isselbacher;Roman W. DeSanctis

  • Characterizing the young patient with aortic dissection: Results from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

    James L Januzzi;Eric M Isselbacher;Rossella Fattori;Jeanna V Cooper

  • Gender-Related Differences in Acute Aortic Dissection

    Christoph A. Nienaber;Rossella Fattori;Rajendra H. Mehta;Barbara M. Richartz

  • Diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of suspected aortic dissection. Old standards and new directions.

    Joaquin E. Cigarroa;Eric M. Isselbacher;Roman W. Desanctis;Kim A. Eagle

  • Acute Intramural Hematoma of the Aorta A Mystery in Evolution

    Arturo Evangelista;Debabrata Mukherjee;Debabrata Mukherjee;Rajendra H. Mehta;Patrick T. O’Gara

  • Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference Writing Group III: Pathophysiology

    David P. Faxon;Valentin Fuster;Peter Libby;Joshua A. Beckman

  • Complicated acute type B dissection: is surgery still the best option?: a report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.

    Rossella Fattori;Thomas T. Tsai;Truls Myrmel;Arturo Evangelista

  • Contemporary Results of Surgery in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Experience

    S. Trimarchi;C.A. Nienaber;V. Rampoldi

Frequent Co-Authors

Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christoph A. Nienaber
Christoph A. Nienaber National Institutes of Health
Eduardo Bossone
Eduardo Bossone University of Naples Federico II
Arturo Evangelista
Arturo Evangelista Autonomous University of Barcelona
Patrick T. O'Gara
Patrick T. O'Gara Brigham and Women's Hospital
Reed E. Pyeritz
Reed E. Pyeritz University of Pennsylvania
Thoralf M. Sundt
Thoralf M. Sundt Harvard University
James L. Januzzi
James L. Januzzi Harvard University
Udo Sechtem
Udo Sechtem Robert Bosch (Germany)
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Gilbert R. Upchurch University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine can take many forms beyond the traditional MD route. One popular alternative is nursing, which offers a variety of online options. For those without a nursing background, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online enable fast-tracked entry into advanced nursing roles, even for students with different undergraduate degrees.

Many prospective medical students seek programs that are accessible. Some schools are known to be the easiest nursing schools to get into, featuring flexible admission standards and rolling intakes, making them appealing options to a broad range of applicants.

Careers aren't limited to direct patient care. Medical billing and coding is a high-demand field that can be studied online, with financial assistance for eligible students. Explore the medical billing and coding financial aid options to find a pathway that suits your needs.

Admission requirements for nursing schools also vary. If exam barriers are a concern, there are do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school programs that waive common entrance exams, providing more accessible routes to a nursing degree.

Best Scientists Citing Eric M. Isselbacher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles