World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Witold Rużyłło publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Witold Rużyłło sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Witold Rużyłło D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Witold Rużyłło sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Polish Academy of Science

Overview

Witold Rużyłło is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has focused their academic research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range of cardiovascular and pulmonary studies. Key topics include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments

Witold Rużyłło has contributed to various scholarly papers published in multiple reputable journals. Recent notable publications include:

  • "Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Reintervention and Survival After Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement," 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Impact of Complete Revascularization in the ISCHEMIA Trial," 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary SAPIEN 3 valve implantation: an international registry," 2023, European Heart Journal
  • "Heterogeneity of diabetes as a risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial," 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Kardiologia Polska
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Minerva Cardiology and Angiology
  • New England Journal of Medicine

Collaboration plays an important role in their research, with frequent co-authorship involving several peers. Notable co-authors include Marcin Demkow, Elżbieta Katarzyna Biernacka, Łukasz Kalińczuk, William E. Boden, and Judith S. Hochman.

In recognition of their academic contributions, Witold Rużyłło received an award from the Polish Academy of Science in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Stephen D. Wiviott;Eugene Braunwald;Carolyn H. McCabe;Gilles Montalescot

  • Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

    Robert P. Giugliano;Christian T. Ruff;Eugene Braunwald;Sabina A. Murphy

  • Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Sigmund Silber;Per Albertsson;Francisco F. Avilés;Paolo G. Camici

  • Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Frans Van de Werf;Diego Ardissino;Amadeo Betriu;Dennis V. Cokkinos

  • Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease.

    David J. Maron;Judith S. Hochman;Harmony R. Reynolds;Sripal Bangalore

  • Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

    Micheal E. Bertrand;Maarten L. Simoons;Keith A.A. Fox;Lars C. Wallentin

  • Apixaban with Antiplatelet Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome

    John H. Jh Alexander;RD D Renato D. Rd Renato D Lopes;Stefan James;Rakhi Kilaru

  • Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial.

    James J Ferguson;Robert M Califf;Elliott M Antman;Marc Cohen

  • Effect of Torcetrapib on the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Steven E. Nissen;Jean Claude Tardif;Stephen J. Nicholls;James H. Revkin

  • Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction.

    Judith S. Hochman;Gervasio A. Lamas;Christopher E. Buller;Vladimir Dzavik

  • Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization

    Matthew T. Roe;Paul W. Armstrong;Keith A.A. Fox;Harvey D. White

  • Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist Vorapaxar in Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Pierluigi Tricoci;Zhen Huang;Claes Held;David J. Moliterno

  • Direct intramyocardial plasmid vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 gene therapy in patients with stable severe angina pectoris A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study: the Euroinject One trial.

    Jens Kastrup;Erik Jørgensen;Andreas Rück;Kristina Tägil

  • Intracoronary infusion of bone marrow-derived selected CD34+CXCR4+ cells and non-selected mononuclear cells in patients with acute STEMI and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: results of randomized, multicentre Myocardial Regeneration by Intracoronary Infusion of Selected Population of Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction (REGENT) Trial.

    Michał Tendera;Wojciech Wojakowski;Witold Rużyłło;Lidia Chojnowska

  • Apixaban, an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor, in combination with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: results of the Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) trial.

    Investigators;John H Alexander;Richard C Becker

  • Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina.

    Caroline Daly;Felicity Clemens;Jose L. Lopez Sendon;Luigi Tavazzi

  • Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Left Main Disease Treated With Either Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Trial

    Marie Claude Morice;Patrick W. Serruys;A. Pieter Kappetein;Ted E. Feldman

  • Management of acute coronary syndromes: acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology

    M. E. Bertrand;M. L. Simoons;K. A. A. Fox;L. C. Wallentin

  • MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION

    F. Van de Werf;D. Ardissino;A. Betriu;D. Cokkinos

  • Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation The Task Force on the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology*

    Michel E. Bertrand;Maarten L. Simoons;Keith A. A. Fox;Lars C. Wallentin

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith S. Hochman
Judith S. Hochman New York University
Gervasio A. Lamas
Gervasio A. Lamas Columbia University
Renato D. Lopes
Renato D. Lopes Duke University
Lars Wallentin
Lars Wallentin Uppsala University
Paul W. Armstrong
Paul W. Armstrong University of Alberta
John H. Alexander
John H. Alexander Duke University
Kurt Huber
Kurt Huber Sigmund Freud University Vienna
Christian W. Hamm
Christian W. Hamm University of Giessen
Antonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS
Harvey D. White
Harvey D. White Auckland City Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA can lead to a range of educational and career options. Many students and working professionals look to online programs for greater flexibility and affordability.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their qualifications, several most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs allow individuals to complete a BSN degree while working. Those without a nursing background but interested in entering the field should consider direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors.

Admission requirements vary, but for those just starting, choosing the easiest rn program to get into can help you begin your nursing journey sooner.

If hands-on clinical roles are not appealing, administrative careers in healthcare, such as medical billing and coding, are in demand. There are online medical coding classes with financial aid available, making it easier to enter this growing field.

Exploring these related online degrees and pathways can help you find the right fit for your interests, budget, and long-term career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Witold Rużyłło

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles