World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
50551
World Ranking
17785
National Ranking
8875

Gervasio A. Lamas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gervasio A. Lamas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 352 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gervasio A. Lamas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gervasio A. Lamas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gervasio A. Lamas is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Environmental Science, with 34 and 19 publications respectively. Within these, their work focuses significantly on subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (16 publications), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (12 publications), Nutrition and Dietetics (7 publications), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4 publications), and Surgery (3 publications).

Their research topics encompass areas including Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity, which is addressed in 16 of their publications, as well as Trace Elements in Health (12 publications). Additional focus areas include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 publications), Air Quality and Health Impacts (6 publications), Climate Change and Health Impacts (6 publications), Heavy metals in environment (4 publications), and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 publications).

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Gervasio A. Lamas include Francisco Ujueta, Ana Navas-Acién, Kevin J. Anstrom, Daniel B. Mark, and Robin Boineau.

Their work has been published across several venues, with multiple contributions to the American Heart Journal (4 publications) and the Journal of the American Heart Association (2 publications). Other frequent venues include ISEE Conference Abstracts (2 publications), Circulation (2 publications), and JAMA (1 publication).

Recent published papers include:

  • Contaminant Metals as Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2023, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Lead and Cadmium as Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Burden of Proof Has Been Met, 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Low-Level Cadmium Exposure and Atherosclerosis, 2021, Current Environmental Health Reports
  • Effect of Thromboprophylaxis on Clinical Outcomes After COVID-19 Hospitalization, 2023, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • The trial to assess chelation therapy 2 (TACT2): Rationale and design, 2022, American Heart Journal

Best Publications

  • ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction).

    Elliott M. Antman;Daniel T. Anbe;Paul Wayne Armstrong;Eric R. Bates

  • EFFECT OF CAPTOPRIL ON MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. RESULTS OF THE SURVIVAL AND VENTRICULAR ENLARGEMENT TRIAL

    Marc A. Pfeffer;Eugene Braunwald;Lemuel A. Moyé;Lofty Basta

  • Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients With Normal Baseline QRS Duration in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction

    Michael O. Sweeney;Anne S. Hellkamp;Kenneth A. Ellenbogen;Arnold J. Greenspon

  • 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

    Elliott M. Antman;Mary Hand;Paul W. Armstrong;Eric R. Bates

  • Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction.

    Marc A. Pfeffer;Gervasio A. Lamas;Douglas E. Vaughan;Alfred F. Parisi

  • Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction

    Gervasio A. Lamas;Kerry L. Lee;Michael O. Sweeney;Russell Silverman

  • 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Unknown

  • Ventricular Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction

    Gary F. Mitchell;Gervasio A. Lamas;Marc A. Pfeffer

  • Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. The protective effects of captopril.

    M St John Sutton;M A Pfeffer;T Plappert;J L Rouleau

  • ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Elliott M. Antman;Daniel T. Anbe;Paul Wayne Armstrong;Eric R. Bates

  • Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction.

    Judith S. Hochman;Gervasio A. Lamas;Christopher E. Buller;Vladimir Dzavik

  • Atrial High Rate Episodes Detected by Pacemaker Diagnostics Predict Death and Stroke Report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST)

    Taya V. Glotzer;Anne S. Hellkamp;John Zimmerman;Michael O. Sweeney

  • Clinical Significance of Mitral Regurgitation After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gervasio A. Lamas;Gary F. Mitchell;Greg C. Flaker;Sidney C. Smith

  • Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.

    G A Lamas;E J Orav;B S Stambler;K A Ellenbogen

  • Ventricular dysfunction and the risk of stroke after myocardial infarction

    Evan Loh;Martin St John Sutton;Chuan Chuan C Wun;Jean L. Rouleau

  • Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial.

    Martin St. John Sutton;Marc A. Pfeffer;Lemuel Moye;Ted Plappert

  • Right ventricular dysfunction and risk of heart failure and mortality after myocardial infarction

    Leonardo A.M. Zornoff;Hicham Skali;Marc A. Pfeffer;Martin St. John Sutton

  • A computer-derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain.

    Goldman L;Weinberg M;Weisberg M;Olshen R

  • Minimizing Ventricular Pacing to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation in Sinus-Node Disease

    Michael O. Sweeney;Alan J. Bank;Emmanuel Nsah;Maria Koullick

  • Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. SAVE Investigators.

    J D Rutherford;M A Pfeffer;L A Moyé;B R Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith S. Hochman
Judith S. Hochman New York University
Marc A. Pfeffer
Marc A. Pfeffer Harvard Medical School
Kerry L. Lee
Kerry L. Lee Duke University
Daniel B. Mark
Daniel B. Mark Duke University
Eugene Braunwald
Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School
Witold Rużyłło
Witold Rużyłło New York University
Lemuel A. Moyé
Lemuel A. Moyé The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Harvey D. White
Harvey D. White Auckland City Hospital
G.B. John Mancini
G.B. John Mancini University of British Columbia
Eldrin F. Lewis
Eldrin F. Lewis Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean traditional, lengthy, or expensive paths. Many students are choosing alternative healthcare degrees with strong job prospects and flexible online formats. If you’re considering a more affordable option, look into affordable nursing programs, which offer accredited training without the high tuition of many campus programs.

For those who are already Registered Nurses, the cheapest rn to bsn degrees can help you advance quickly and affordably. These programs are designed to build on existing skills and open doors to higher-level nursing roles.

If you’re a non-nurse graduate looking to shift into healthcare, entry level msn programs online offer a fast-track option to become a nurse without having a bachelor’s degree in nursing. Meanwhile, experienced nurses seeking leadership or academic roles should consider doctorate in nursing education online programs for the highest qualifications in the field.

These alternative online degrees provide rewarding career paths in medicine, increased flexibility, and valuable savings compared to traditional programs.

Best Scientists Citing Gervasio A. Lamas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles