World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 72 19748 18522 838 792 325 33712

G.B. John Mancini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by G.B. John Mancini between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. G.B. John Mancini published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2016. 44 of the 405 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2016. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 19 publications
1985 2025

405 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
G.B. John Mancini: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 6
1992 0
1993 3
1994 3
1995 2
1996 3
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 5
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 7
2007 14
2008 11
2009 15
2010 21
2011 19
2012 16
2013 18
2014 26
2015 16
2016 27
2017 16
2018 25
2019 11
2020 16
2021 13
2022 25
2023 21
2024 25
2025 19
Total 405
Download as CSV

G.B. John Mancini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G.B. John Mancini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 325 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 325
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

G.B. John Mancini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G.B. John Mancini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391 72
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

G.B. John Mancini is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration in Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Economics and Econometrics.

Their recent publication record includes papers on cardiovascular disease management, lipid levels, and dietary impacts on cardiometabolic factors. Notable papers include:

  • Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults, 2021, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Association of Bempedoic Acid Administration With Atherogenic Lipid Levels in Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials of Patients With Hypercholesterolemia, 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • Survival After Invasive or Conservative Management of Stable Coronary Disease, 2022, Circulation
  • The impact of type of dietary protein, animal versus vegetable, in modifying cardiometabolic risk factors: A position paper from the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP), 2020, Clinical Nutrition

Mancini collaborates frequently with several researchers in related fields. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Maciej Banach
  • Liam R. Brunham
  • Lawrence A. Leiter
  • William E. Boden
  • Robert A. Hegele

The majority of their publications appear in the following venues:

  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of Clinical Lipidology

Their research topics largely cover:

  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management

Mancini has published at least one book titled SUS EM PERSPECTIVA: Da Atenção Primária à Complexidade do Cuidado, expected in 2025, through Editora BAGAI eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease

    William E. Boden;Koon K. Teo;Pamela M. Hartigan;David J. Maron

  • Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy

    Leslee J. Shaw;Daniel S. Berman;David J. Maron;G. B. John Mancini

  • Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease.

    David J. Maron;Judith S. Hochman;Harmony R. Reynolds;Sripal Bangalore

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve From Anatomic CT Angiography

    James K. Min;Jonathon Leipsic;Michael J. Pencina;Daniel S. Berman

  • 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Adult

    Todd J. Anderson;Jean Grégoire;Glen J. Pearson;Arden R. Barry

  • 2012 Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Adult

    Todd J. Anderson;Jean Grégoire;Robert A. Hegele;Patrick Couture

  • 2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult - 2009 recommendations

    Jacques Genest;Ruth McPherson;Jiri Frohlich;Todd Anderson

  • SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee.

    Jonathon Leipsic;Suhny Abbara;Stephan Achenbach;Ricardo Cury

  • Effect of PCI on Quality of Life in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease

    William S. Weintraub;John A. Spertus;Paul Kolm;David J. Maron

  • Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Clinical Outcomes and Risk of Recurrence

    Jacqueline Saw;Karin Humphries;Eve Aymong;Tara Sedlak

  • Reduction of morbidity and mortality by statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    G.B. John Mancini;Mahyar Etminan;Bin Zhang;Linda E. Levesque

  • Contemporary Review on Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

    Jacqueline Saw;G.B. John Mancini;Karin H. Humphries

  • The prognostic importance of endothelial dysfunction and carotid atheromaburden in patients with coronary artery disease

    Sammy Y Chan;G.B.John Mancini;Lisa Kuramoto;Michael Schulzer

  • Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography.

    Jonathon Leipsic;Troy M Labounty;Brett Heilbron;James K Min

  • Coronary Stent Restenosis in Patients Treated With Cilostazol

    John S. Douglas;David R. Holmes;Dean J. Kereiakes;Cindy L. Grines

  • Estimated Radiation Dose Reduction Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Coronary CT Angiography: The ERASIR Study

    Jonathon Leipsic;Troy M. LaBounty;Brett Heilbron;James K. Min

  • Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia and Statin Intolerance.

    Ulrich Laufs;Maciej Banach;G. B. John Mancini;Daniel Gaudet

  • Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid added to ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients with hypercholesterolemia: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.

    Christie M. Ballantyne;Maciej Banach;G.B. John Mancini;Norman E. Lepor

  • Primary Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty in Occluded Coronary Arteries The Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA)

    Christopher E. Buller;Vladimir Dzavik;Ronald G. Carere;G. B. John Mancini

  • Nonatherosclerotic coronary artery disease in young women.

    Jacqueline Saw;Eve Aymong;G.B. John Mancini;Tara Sedlak

Frequent Co-Authors

Koon K. Teo
Koon K. Teo McMaster University
John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City
Bernard R. Chaitman
Bernard R. Chaitman Saint Louis University
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
William S. Weintraub
William S. Weintraub Georgetown University
Jonathon Leipsic
Jonathon Leipsic University of British Columbia
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Judith S. Hochman
Judith S. Hochman New York University
Jacques Genest
Jacques Genest McGill University Health Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For individuals interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school, there are numerous flexible and affordable online degree options. Nursing, in particular, offers several online programs tailored to different backgrounds and career goals.

Cost is often a major consideration when evaluating nursing schools. Prospective students commonly ask, how much does online nursing school cost? Many institutions now offer low-cost, accredited degrees to make nursing more accessible.

For working RNs wanting to advance, cheap rn to bsn programs are designed to help nurses earn a bachelor’s degree quickly and affordably. Those seeking the highest level of clinical nursing practice may be interested in the cheapest dnp programs online, which provide a pathway to leadership, education, and advanced practice roles.

If you’re starting your healthcare journey with a non-nursing background, entry level msn programs online offer an accelerated route to a master’s degree and nursing licensure.

Exploring these related options can open doors to meaningful healthcare careers, whether your goal is bedside care, research, or leadership.

Best Scientists Citing G.B. John Mancini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles