World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Portugal
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 56 3588 3427 16 16 159 15118

Emanuel Dutra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emanuel Dutra between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emanuel Dutra published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 12 of the 199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2016. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 4 publications
2005 2026

199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emanuel Dutra: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 3
2010 11
2011 6
2012 12
2013 17
2014 13
2015 17
2016 20
2017 5
2018 12
2019 14
2020 15
2021 11
2022 10
2023 7
2024 12
2025 8
2026 4
Total 199
Download as CSV

Emanuel Dutra publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emanuel Dutra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 159 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 159
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Emanuel Dutra D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emanuel Dutra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202 56
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Portugal Leader Award

Overview

Emanuel Dutra is affiliated with the Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera in Portugal. Their research spans environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a focus on various subfields such as global and planetary change, atmospheric science, oceanography, environmental engineering, and water science and technology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics, including climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, cryospheric studies and observations, urban heat island mitigation, oceanographic and atmospheric processes, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Among recent publications attributed to Emanuel Dutra are:

  • "An offline study of the impact of lakes on the performance of the ECMWF surface scheme," 2024, Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • "ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications," 2021, Earth system science data
  • "Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "MSWX: Global 3-Hourly 0.1° Bias-Corrected Meteorological Data Including Near-Real-Time Updates and Forecast Ensembles," 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "ECLand: The ECMWF Land Surface Modelling System," 2021, Atmosphere

Emanuel Dutra frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Atmosphere
  • Earth System Science Data
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

The scientist regularly collaborates with other researchers, including Souhail Boussetta, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Isabel F. Trigo, Gabriele Arduini, and Miguel Nogueira.

Best Publications

  • ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications

    Joaquín Muñoz-Sabater;Emanuel Dutra;Emanuel Dutra;Anna Agustí-Panareda;Clément Albergel;Clément Albergel

  • EC-Earth A Seamless Earth-System Prediction Approach in Action

    Wilco Hazeleger;Camiel Severijns;Tido Semmler;Simona Ştefănescu

  • ERA-Interim/Land: a global land surface reanalysis data set

    G. Balsamo;C. Albergel;A. Beljaars;S. Boussetta

  • GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning

    L. Alfieri;P. Burek;E. Dutra;B. Krzeminski

  • Evaluation of forest snow processes models (SnowMIP2)

    Nick Rutter;Richard Essery;John Pomeroy;Nuria Altimir

  • ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better?

    Clement Albergel;Emanuel Dutra;Simon Munier;Jean Christophe Calvet

  • An Improved Snow Scheme for the ECMWF Land Surface Model: Description and Offline Validation

    Emanuel Dutra;Emanuel Dutra;Gianpaolo Balsamo;Pedro Viterbo;Pedro M. A. Miranda

  • Global evaluation of runoff from 10 state-of-the-art hydrological models

    Hylke E. Beck;Albert I. J. M. van Dijk;Ad de Roo;Emanuel Dutra;Emanuel Dutra

  • Stochastic representations of model uncertainties at ECMWF: state of the art and future vision

    Martin Leutbecher;Sarah‐Jane Lock;Pirkka Ollinaho;Simon T. K. Lang

  • Evaluation of snow depth and snow cover over the Tibetan Plateau in global reanalyses using in situ and satellite remote sensing observations

    Yvan Orsolini;Martin Wegmann;Martin Wegmann;Emanuel Dutra;Boqi Liu

  • A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: The eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset

    Jaap Schellekens;Emanuel Dutra;Emanuel Dutra;Alberto Martínez-de la Torre;Gianpaolo Balsamo

  • The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis

    Mark Trigg;Cathryn Birch;Jeffrey Neal;Paul Bates

  • Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade

    F. Pappenberger;F. Pappenberger;E. Dutra;F. Wetterhall;H. L. Cloke;H. L. Cloke

  • Evaluation of global precipitation data sets over the Iberian Peninsula

    Margarida Belo-Pereira;Emanuel Dutra;Emanuel Dutra;Pedro Viterbo

  • TOWARD GLOBAL DROUGHT EARLY WARNING CAPABILITY Expanding International Cooperation for the Development of a Framework for Monitoring and Forecasting

    Will Pozzi;Justin Sheffield;Robert Stefanski;Douglas Cripe

  • ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks

    Gerhard Krinner;Chris Derksen;Richard Essery;Mark Flanner

  • On the contribution of lakes in predicting near-surface temperature in a global weather forecasting model

    G. Balsamo;R. Salgado;E. Dutra;S. Boussetta

  • Satellite and in situ observations for advancing global earth surface modelling: A review

    Gianpaolo Balsamo;Anna Agusti-Panareda;Clement Albergel;Gabriele Arduini

  • The 2010–2011 drought in the Horn of Africa in ECMWF reanalysis and seasonal forecast products

    Emanuel Dutra;Linus Magnusson;Frederik. Wetterhall;Hannah L. Cloke;Hannah L. Cloke

  • Natural land carbon dioxide exchanges in the ECMWF integrated forecasting system: Implementation and offline validation

    Souhail Boussetta;Gianpaolo Balsamo;Anton Beljaars;Anna‐Agusti Panareda

  • Analysis of the water level dynamics simulated by a global river model: A case study in the Amazon River

    Dai Yamazaki;Dai Yamazaki;Hyongki Lee;Douglas E. Alsdorf;Emanuel Dutra

  • Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison

    Cecile B. Menard;Richard Essery;Gerhard Krinner;Gabriele Arduini

Frequent Co-Authors

Florian Pappenberger
Florian Pappenberger European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Gianpaolo Balsamo
Gianpaolo Balsamo European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Clément Albergel
Clément Albergel Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Fredrik Wetterhall
Fredrik Wetterhall European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Hannah Cloke
Hannah Cloke University of Reading
Joaquin Munoz-Sabater
Joaquin Munoz-Sabater European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Pedro Viterbo
Pedro Viterbo Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera
Anton Beljaars
Anton Beljaars European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Hessel Winsemius
Hessel Winsemius Delft University of Technology
Rene Orth
Rene Orth Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in advancing their education while focusing on environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can offer flexible and diverse opportunities. Programs that do not require a dissertation can be especially appealing for those seeking to balance work and study, making doctoral programs online no dissertation a valuable option.

Many professionals look to elevate their credentials through specialized education pathways. The best eds to edd programs provide a streamlined track for educators aiming to make an impact in environmental education or policy.

For those considering a career with a social impact focus, such as community sustainability or environmental justice, online degree options like online dsw programs in social work offer avenues to combine environmental science knowledge with social work expertise.

Additionally, students seeking cost-effective, broad-based education can benefit from low cost online general studies degree programs, which provide foundational skills applicable across various environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Emanuel Dutra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles