World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 53 4169 3990 107 102 227 14410

Hessel Winsemius publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hessel Winsemius between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hessel Winsemius published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2015. 6 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2015. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
2005 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hessel Winsemius: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 4
2008 6
2009 3
2010 4
2011 3
2012 10
2013 24
2014 15
2015 30
2016 26
2017 17
2018 22
2019 24
2020 22
2021 10
2022 19
2023 14
2024 2
2025 4
Total 261
Download as CSV

Hessel Winsemius publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hessel Winsemius sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 227 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263 227
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Hessel Winsemius D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hessel Winsemius sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217 53
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Hessel Winsemius is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable work in subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, and Earth-Surface Processes.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Coastal and Marine Dynamics, Precipitation Measurement and Analysis, and Hydrology and Drought Analysis.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hessel Winsemius include:

  • Philip J. Ward
  • Dirk Eilander
  • Dai Yamazaki
  • Albrecht Weerts
  • H. H. G. Savenije

Publication venues where their research is frequently published encompass:

  • Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Flood Risk Management
  • Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Scientific Reports

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Hessel Winsemius include:

  • "Review article: Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale" (2020), published in Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • "Measuring compound flood potential from river discharge and storm surge extremes at the global scale" (2020), published in Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • "Global-scale benefit-cost analysis of coastal flood adaptation to different flood risk drivers using structural measures" (2020), published in Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • "The effect of surge on riverine flood hazard and impact in deltas globally" (2020), published in Environmental Research Letters
  • "Cutting the costs of coastal protection by integrating vegetation in flood defences" (2021), published in Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review

    M. Hrachowitz;H. H. G. Savenije;G. Blöschl;J. J. Mcdonnell

  • Global drivers of future river flood risk

    Hessel C. Winsemius;Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts;Ludovicus P.H. van Beek;Marc F.P. Bierkens

  • A global reanalysis of storm surges and extreme sea levels

    Sanne Muis;Martin Verlaan;Hessel C. Winsemius;Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts

  • A framework for global river flood risk assessments

    H. C. Winsemius;L. P. H. Van Beek;B. Jongman;P. J. Ward

  • Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation

    Brenden Jongman;Hessel C. Winsemius;Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts;Erin Coughlan de Perez;Erin Coughlan de Perez

  • Earth's surface water change over the past 30 years

    Gennadii Donchyts;Fedor Baart;Hessel C. Winsemius;Noel Gorelick

  • Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity

    Ph.J. Ward;B. Jongman;F.C. Sperna Weiland;A. Bouwman

  • Disaster risk, climate change, and poverty: assessing the global exposure of poor people to floods and droughts

    Hessel C. Winsemius;Brenden Jongman;Ted I.E. Veldkamp;Stephane Hallegatte

  • Hyper-resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next?

    Marc F. P. Bierkens;Victoria A. Bell;Peter Burek;Nathaniel Chaney

  • A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas

    Philip J. Ward;Brenden Jongman;Brenden Jongman;Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts;Paul D. Bates

  • FLOPROS: an evolving global database of flood protection standards

    Paolo Scussolini;Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts;Brenden Jongman;Laurens M. Bouwer

  • Strong influence of El Niño Southern Oscillation on flood risk around the world

    Philip J. Ward;Brenden Jongman;Matti Kummu;Michael D. Dettinger

  • Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models

    Philip J. Ward;Brenden Jongman;Brenden Jongman;Peter Salamon;Alanna Simpson

  • Dependence between high sea-level and high river discharge increases flood hazard in global deltas and estuaries

    Philip J Ward;Anaïs Couasnon;Dirk Eilander;Ivan D Haigh

  • Review article: Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale

    Philip J. Ward;Veit Blauhut;Nadia Bloemendaal;James E. Daniell

  • A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures

    T. Euser;H. C. Winsemius;M. Hrachowitz;F. Fenicia

  • A 30 m Resolution Surface Water Mask Including Estimation of Positional and Thematic Differences Using Landsat 8, SRTM and OpenStreetMap: A Case Study in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia

    Gennadii Donchyts;Jaap Schellekens;Hessel Winsemius;Elmar Eisemann

  • On the calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins: A framework for integrating hard and soft hydrological information

    H. C. Winsemius;Bettina Schaefli;A. Montanari;H. H. G. Savenije

  • The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis

    Mark Trigg;Cathryn Birch;Jeffrey Neal;Paul Bates

  • Estimation of predictive hydrological uncertainty using quantile regression: examples from the national flood forecasting system (England and Wales)

    A. H. Weerts;H. C. Winsemius;J. S. Verkade

  • The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models

    R. Klees;E. A. Revtova;B. C. Gunter;P. Ditmar

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hubert H. G. Savenije Delft University of Technology
Marc F. P. Bierkens
Marc F. P. Bierkens Utrecht University
Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Markus Hrachowitz
Markus Hrachowitz Delft University of Technology
Paul D Bates
Paul D Bates University of Bristol
Albrecht Weerts
Albrecht Weerts Wageningen University & Research
Dai Yamazaki
Dai Yamazaki University of Tokyo
Emanuel Dutra
Emanuel Dutra Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera
Florian Pappenberger
Florian Pappenberger European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Nick van de Giesen
Nick van de Giesen Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens a variety of related educational paths, especially online. Many students consider transitioning into advanced programs such as eds to edd programs, which focus on educational leadership and can complement sustainability efforts within academic and community settings.

For those interested in social impact and human-environment interaction, dsw programs online provide a pathway to advanced social work roles that often engage with environmental justice issues. These degrees offer practical approaches to policy-making and community health in ecological contexts.

Students seeking a flexible yet budget-friendly option might explore a low cost online general studies degree. This degree offers foundational knowledge and the option to tailor coursework towards environmental concerns, making it accessible for a wider range of learners.

Additionally, those aiming for a quicker route into the workforce might consider some of the easiest bachelor degree programs. While maintaining academic quality, these programs reduce barriers, allowing students to focus on key environmental topics and practical skills needed in entry-level careers.

Best Scientists Citing Hessel Winsemius

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles