World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giuliano Di Baldassarre

Giuliano Di Baldassarre

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
74
Citations
19067
World Ranking
1347
National Ranking
21

Giuliano Di Baldassarre publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuliano Di Baldassarre sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 298 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Giuliano Di Baldassarre D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuliano Di Baldassarre sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Giuliano Di Baldassarre is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Social Sciences, with a focus on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Water Science and Technology, Ocean Engineering, and Atmospheric Science.

The main topics addressed within their body of work include Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Disaster Management and Resilience, Water Resources Management and Optimization, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, and Water Governance and Infrastructure.

Giuliano Di Baldassarre has contributed to numerous scholarly articles, with selected recent papers including:

  • The challenge of unprecedented floods and droughts in risk management, 2022, Nature
  • Anthropogenic Drought: Definition, Challenges, and Opportunities, 2021, Reviews of Geophysics
  • The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies, 2020, Water Security
  • Don't blame the rain: Social power and the 2015-2017 drought in Cape Town, 2021, Journal of Hydrology
  • Scientists' warning on extreme wildfire risks to water supply, 2021, Hydrological Processes

The scientist frequently collaborates with peers including Elena Mondino, Maurizio Mazzoleni, Johanna Mård, Maria Rusca, and Elena Ridolfi. Their contributions appear regularly in journals such as Hydrological Sciences Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Environmental Research Letters, and Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water.

Best Publications

  • Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    Günter Blöschl;Marc F.P. Bierkens;Antonio Chambel;Christophe Cudennec

  • “Panta Rhei—Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society—The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022

    A. Montanari;G. Young;H.H.G. Savenije;D.A. Hughes

  • Drought in the Anthropocene

    Anne F. Van Loon;Tom Gleeson;Julian Clark;Albert I J M Van Dijk

  • Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis

    G. Di Baldassarre;A. Montanari

  • Socio-hydrology: conceptualising human-flood interactions

    G. Di Baldassarre;A. Viglione;G. Carr;L. Kuil

  • The challenge of unprecedented floods and droughts in risk management

    Unknown

  • Debates—Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes

    Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Alberto Viglione;Gemma Carr;Linda Kuil

  • Flood fatalities in Africa: From diagnosis to mitigation

    Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Alberto Montanari;Harry Lins;Demetris Koutsoyiannis

  • Drought in a human-modified world : reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches

    Anne F. Van Loon;Kerstin Stahl;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Julian Clark

  • Water shortages worsened by reservoir effects

    Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Niko Wanders;Amir AghaKouchak;Linda Kuil

  • Sociohydrology : Scientific Challenges in Addressing the Sustainable Development Goals

    Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Murugesu Sivapalan;Maria Rusca;Christophe Cudennec

  • Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk – Roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust

    Alberto Viglione;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Luigia Brandimarte;Linda Kuil

  • Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches

    Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Guy Schumann;Paul D. Bates;Jim E. Freer

  • Anthropogenic Drought: Definition, Challenges, and Opportunities

    Amir AghaKouchak;Ali Mirchi;Kaveh Madani;Kaveh Madani;Giuliano Di Baldassarre

  • Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human-water systems

    G. Di Baldassarre;M. Kooy;J. S. Kemerink;L. Brandimarte

  • Adaptation to flood risk: Results of international paired flood event studies

    Heidi Kreibich;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Sergiy Vorogushyn;Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts

  • The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies

    Philip J. Ward;Marleen C. de Ruiter;Johanna Mård;Kai Schröter

  • An intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height, width, and slope

    M. Durand;C. J. Gleason;P. A. Garambois;D. Bjerklie

  • Model selection techniques for the frequency analysis of hydrological extremes

    Francesco Laio;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Alberto Montanari

  • A technique for the calibration of hydraulic models using uncertain satellite observations of flood extent

    Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Guy Schumann;Paul D. Bates

  • Detailed data is welcome, but with a pinch of salt: Accuracy, precision, and uncertainty in flood inundation modeling

    F. Dottori;G. Di Baldassarre;E. Todini

Frequent Co-Authors

Alberto Viglione
Alberto Viglione Polytechnic University of Turin
Alberto Montanari
Alberto Montanari University of Bologna
Paul D Bates
Paul D Bates University of Bristol
Anne F. Van Loon
Anne F. Van Loon Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Attilio Castellarin
Attilio Castellarin University of Bologna
Dimitri Solomatine
Dimitri Solomatine IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
Heidi Kreibich
Heidi Kreibich Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Guy Schumann
Guy Schumann University of Bristol
Keith Beven
Keith Beven Lancaster University
Marco Borga
Marco Borga University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students passionate about Environmental Sciences in the USA can explore a variety of online degrees that complement and expand their career opportunities. For those interested in the earth's physical structure and natural processes, pursuing a geology degree online offers a strong foundation in studying soil, minerals, and rock formations.

Another promising option involves Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which combines technology with spatial data analysis. Colleges with GIS programs provide critical skills for environmental planning, resource management, and disaster response, making it a growing field within environmental sciences. Prospective students can find top programs through resources like colleges with gis programs.

For those aiming to influence public policies related to sustainability and environmental regulation, an online Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be ideal. The best online mpa programs integrate leadership, policy, and management skills tailored for public sector roles focused on environmental governance.

Finally, understanding societal impacts and human behaviors is crucial in solving environmental challenges. The best online bachelor degree in sociology programs offer insight into social dynamics and community engagement, beneficial for careers in environmental advocacy and education.

Best Scientists Citing Giuliano Di Baldassarre

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles