World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 68 829 721 395 335 230 46151

Richard M. Felder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard M. Felder between 1965 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard M. Felder published across 62 years, from 1965 to 2026, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2000. 1 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2000. 1965: 2 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 2 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 4 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1965 2026

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard M. Felder: publications per year, 1965 to 2026
Year Publications
1965 2
1966 1
1967 2
1968 2
1969 2
1970 3
1971 0
1972 1
1973 3
1974 3
1975 3
1976 2
1977 1
1978 4
1979 5
1980 6
1981 6
1982 2
1983 3
1984 4
1985 3
1986 1
1987 3
1988 6
1989 2
1990 2
1991 4
1992 6
1993 10
1994 5
1995 5
1996 8
1997 5
1998 6
1999 10
2000 17
2001 10
2002 12
2003 8
2004 8
2005 7
2006 5
2007 10
2008 5
2009 6
2010 4
2011 2
2012 9
2013 1
2014 5
2015 6
2016 6
2017 1
2018 6
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 0
2026 1
Total 270
Download as CSV

Richard M. Felder publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Felder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 230 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 230
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard M. Felder D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Felder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49 68
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard M. Felder is affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Education and Media Technology as subfields of study.

The main topics explored in their work include:

  • Experimental Learning in Engineering
  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Online and Blended Learning

Richard M. Felder has contributed articles to several academic journals with equal frequency across the following venues:

  • Journal of Food Science Education
  • Chemical Engineering Education
  • Fluid Phase Equilibria

Recent publications by Richard M. Felder include:

  • "STEM education: A tale of two paradigms," published in 2021 in the Journal of Food Science Education
  • "In Memoriam: David F. Ollis," published in 2024 in Chemical Engineering Education
  • "A note from the (distant) past," published in 2020 in Fluid Phase Equilibria

Their research reflects an engagement with educational frameworks and experimental approaches to learning, particularly within engineering disciplines. The focus on online and blended learning methodologies indicates an interest in evolving teaching techniques and media technologies.

Best Publications

  • Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.

    Richard M. Felder;Linda K. Silverman

  • Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases

    Michael J. Prince;Richard M. Felder

  • Understanding Student Differences

    Richard M. Felder;Rebecca Brent

  • Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles*

    Richard M. Felder;Joni Spurlin

  • LEARNING BY DOING

    Richard M. Felder;Rebecca Brent

  • MATTERS OF STYLE

    Richard M. Felder

  • Reaching the Second Tier--Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education.

    Richard M. Felder

  • Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education

    Richard M. Felder;Eunice R. Henriques

  • Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction

    Richard M. Felder;Rebecca Brent

  • Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria

    Richard M. Felder;Rebecca Brent

  • Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams

    Barbara Oakley;Richard M. Felder;Rebecca Brent;Imad Elhajj

  • The Future of Engineering Education: Part 2. Teaching Methods That Work.

    Richard M. Felder;Donald R. Woods;James E. Stice;Armando Rugarcia

  • Elementary principles of chemical processes

    Richard Mark Felder

  • ACTIVE LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION *

    Richard M. Felder;Rebecca Brent

  • The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning

    Michael J. Prince;R. Felder

  • The Future of Engineering Education: Part 1. A Vision for a New Century

    Armando Rugarcia;Richard M. Felder;Donald R. Woods;James E. Stice

  • Index of Learning Styles

    Richard M. Felder;Joni Spurlin

  • Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning.

    Richard M. Felder;Rebecca Brent

  • THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION II. TEACHING METHODS THAT WORK

    Richard M. Felder;Donald R. Woods;James E. Stice;Armando Rugarcia

  • A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes

    Richard M. Felder;Gary N. Felder;Meredith Mauney;Charles E. Hamrin

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Koros
William J. Koros Georgia Institute of Technology
David F. Ollis
David F. Ollis North Carolina State University
Karl A. Smith
Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota
Henry P. Fleming
Henry P. Fleming North Carolina State University
Robert M. Kelly
Robert M. Kelly North Carolina State University
Cynthia J. Atman
Cynthia J. Atman University of Washington
Thomas A. Litzinger
Thomas A. Litzinger Pennsylvania State University
Charles Rodes
Charles Rodes RTI International
Viney P. Aneja
Viney P. Aneja North Carolina State University
Jan Genzer
Jan Genzer North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online learning options can offer greater flexibility and affordability for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Choosing an accelerated bachelor's degree program can help you start your career faster while maintaining a balance between quality and speed. For those seeking to advance their education quickly, there are also one year graduate programs that allow you to earn a master's degree in a condensed timeframe.

Psychology remains a popular choice, with many students seeking an online masters degree psychology program. These options offer both affordability and flexible scheduling, making them accessible for working professionals. For those pursuing educational leadership roles, consider fast-tracked edd programs that streamline the doctorate process.

Whether you’re beginning your journey or enhancing your qualifications, online degrees can open doors to diverse roles in education, policy, community development, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Felder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles