World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
4243
World Ranking
9199
National Ranking
3298

Charles Rodes publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Rodes sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 97 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Charles Rodes D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Rodes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles Rodes is affiliated with RTI International in the United States. Their research profile reflects an involvement in scientific inquiry through this institution.

Data on their recent papers, co-authors, frequent publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields of study, main topics of work, and awards is not documented in the available records.

This absence of detailed records suggests that either the information is not publicly available or has not been recorded in accessible academic databases.

As such, the primary verifiable information centers on Charles Rodes's professional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Health and Household Air Pollution from Solid Fuel Use: The Need for Improved Exposure Assessment

    Maggie L. Clark;Jennifer L. Peel;Kalpana Balakrishnan;Patrick N. Breysse

  • Characterization of indoor-outdoor aerosol concentration relationships during the Fresno PM exposure studies

    Alan F. Vette;Anne W. Rea;Philip A. Lawless;Charles E. Rodes

  • Black carbon concentrations in California vehicles and estimation of in-vehicle diesel exhaust particulate matter exposures

    Scott A Fruin;Arthur M Winer;Charles E Rodes

  • Particulate matter and manganese exposures in Toronto, Canada

    E.D. Pellizzari;C.A. Clayton;C.E. Rodes;R.E. Mason

  • Differences in blood pressure and vascular responses associated with ambient fine particulate matter exposures measured at the personal versus community level

    Robert D Brook;Robert L Bard;Richard T Burnett;Hwashin H Shin

  • The Significance and Characteristics of the Personal Activity Cloud on Exposure Assessment Measurements for Indoor Contaminants

    Charles E. Rodes;Richard M. Kamens;Russell W. Wiener

  • Penetration of Particles into Buildings and Associated Physical Factors. Part I: Model Development and Computer Simulations

    J. Thornburg;D. S. Ensor;C. E. Rodes;P. A. Lawless

  • Resuspension of Particulate Matter from Carpet Due to Human Activity

    Jacky A. Rosati;Jonathan Thornburg;Charles Rodes

  • Importance of the personal endotoxin cloud in school-age children with asthma.

    Nathan Rabinovitch;Andrew H. Liu;Lening Zhang;Charles E. Rodes

  • The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study: part 2. Personal exposure assessment associated with an elderly study population.

    R. Williams;Juanita Suggs;John Creason;Charles Rodes

  • The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study: part 1. Comparison of ambient, residential outdoor, indoor and apartment particulate matter monitoring.

    Ron Williams;Jack Suggs;R Zweidinger;Gary Evans

  • The Research Triangle Park particulate matter panel study: modeling ambient source contribution to personal and residential PM mass concentrations

    Ron Williams;Jack Suggs;Anne Rea;Linda Sheldon

  • Continuous measurement of fine and ultrafine particulate matter, criteria pollutants and meteorological conditions in urban El Paso, texas

    Christopher A Noble;Shaibal Mukerjee;Melissa Gonzales;Charles E Rodes

  • THE RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK PARTICULATE MATTER PANEL STUDY: PM MASS CONCENTRATION RELATIONSHIPS

    Ron Williams;Jack Suggs;Anne Rea;Kelly Leovic

  • The design and field implementation of the Detroit Exposure and Aerosol Research Study

    Ron Williams;Anne Rea;Alan Vette;Carry Croghan

  • Variations of NO, NO2 and O3 concentrations downwind of a Los Angeles freeway

    Charles E. Rodes;David M. Holland

  • Population-based exposure measurements in EPA region 5: a phase I field study in support of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey.

    E Pellizzari;P Lioy;J Quackenboss;Roy Whitmore

  • Biogas Stoves Reduce Firewood Use, Household Air Pollution, and Hospital Visits in Odisha, India.

    Jessica J. Lewis;John W. Hollingsworth;Ryan T. Chartier;Ellen M. Cooper

  • DEARS particulate matter relationships for personal, indoor, outdoor, and central site settings for a general population

    Charles E. Rodes;Phil A. Lawless;Jonathan W. Thornburg;Ronald W. Williams

  • Experimental methodologies and preliminary transfer factor data for estimation of dermal exposures to particles.

    Charles Rodes;J Newsome;Robert Vanderpool;Jeffrey Antley

  • Multiwavelength absorbance of filter deposits for determination of environmental tobacco smoke and black carbon

    Phil A. Lawless;Charles E. Rodes;David S. Ensor

  • The relationships between personal PM exposures for elderly populations and indoor and outdoor concentrations for three retirement center scenarios

    Charles E Rodes;Philip A Lawless;Gary F Evans;Linda S Sheldon

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Sheldon
Linda Sheldon Environmental Protection Agency
Edo D. Pellizzari
Edo D. Pellizzari Research Triangle Park Foundation
Robert D. Brook
Robert D. Brook University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew H. Liu
Andrew H. Liu University of Colorado Denver
Erwin W. Gelfand
Erwin W. Gelfand University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Paul J. Lioy
Paul J. Lioy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Paul D. Jones
Paul D. Jones University of Saskatchewan
Richard T. Burnett
Richard T. Burnett Health Canada
Steven N. Chillrud
Steven N. Chillrud Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Clifton E. Barry
Clifton E. Barry National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree related to Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career opportunities, often intersecting with social sciences and education fields. For those interested in understanding societal impacts on the environment, an online bachelors degree programs in sociology can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community dynamics.

Advanced education can also enhance career prospects, especially in leadership and research roles. Many professionals seek a doctoral degree without the traditional hurdle of a dissertation, making online doctoral programs without dissertation a popular alternative that balances rigorous study with flexible completion.

Education professionals interested in advancing their qualifications may explore the best online eds to edd programs, which streamline the journey from a master's to a doctorate in education, often with specializations relevant to environmental education and policy.

For social workers focusing on environmental justice and community well-being, enrolling in the cheapest online dsw programs offers an affordable path to doctorate-level expertise, enhancing practical skills and leadership potential in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Charles Rodes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles