World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
6828
World Ranking
5626
National Ranking
2043

Linda Sheldon publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Sheldon sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 91 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Linda Sheldon D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Sheldon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda Sheldon is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including psychology and mathematics, with a focus on both experimental and developmental aspects of these disciplines.

Their primary areas of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Mathematics

Within these fields, they have contributed to several subfields, notably:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Their work addresses key topics related to cognitive and educational processes, particularly in:

  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments

Linda Sheldon has collaborated with a variety of researchers including Susan Colmar, Kit S. Double, Nash Davis, Natalie L. Phillips, and Matthew P. Cheng. These joint efforts reflect interdisciplinary engagement within their research areas.

Their publications have appeared in peer-reviewed venues such as the Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools. One notable paper is "Memory Mates: An Evaluation of a Classroom-Based, Student-Focused Working Memory Intervention", published in 2020 in the Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools. This work contributes to the understanding of interventions aimed at improving cognitive functions within educational settings.

Best Publications

  • Children's exposure assessment: a review of factors influencing Children's exposure, and the data available to characterize and assess that exposure.

    E A Cohen Hubal;L S Sheldon;J M Burke;T R McCurdy

  • An observational study of the potential exposures of preschool children to pentachlorophenol, bisphenol-A, and nonylphenol at home and daycare.

    Nancy K. Wilson;Jane C. Chuang;Marsha K. Morgan;Robert A. Lordo

  • Emissions of volatile organic compounds from building materials and consumer products

    Lance A. Wallace;Edo D Pellizzari;Brian Leaderer;Harvey Zelon

  • Personal Exposures, Indoor Outdoor Relationships, and Breath Levels of Toxic Air-Pollutants Measured for 355 Persons in New-Jersey

    Lance A. Wallace;Edo D. Pellizzari;Ty D.Hartwell;Charles M. Sparacino

  • Exposures of preschool children to chlorpyrifos and its degradation product 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in their everyday environments.

    Marsha K Morgan;Linda S Sheldon;Carry W Croghan;Paul A Jones

  • Driver exposure to volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, ozone and nitrogen dioxide under different driving conditions

    Chang Chuan Chan;Haluk Ozkaynak;John D. Spengler;Linda Sheldon

  • Organic compounds in the Delaware River

    Linda S. Sheldon;Ronald A. Hites

  • Particulate matter and heart rate variability among elderly retirees: the Baltimore 1998 PM study.

    John Creason;Lucas Neas;Debra Walsh;Ron Williams

  • Pesticides and their metabolites in the homes and urine of farmworker children living in the Salinas Valley, CA.

    Asa Bradman;Donald Whitaker;Lesliam Quirós;Rosemary Castorina

  • Characterization of indoor-outdoor aerosol concentration relationships during the Fresno PM exposure studies

    Alan F. Vette;Anne W. Rea;Philip A. Lawless;Charles E. Rodes

  • The TEAM Study: Personal exposures to toxic substances in air, drinking water, and breath of 400 residents of New Jersey, North Carolina, and North Dakota

    Lance A. Wallace;Edo D. Pellizzari;Tyler D. Hartwell;Charles Sparacino

  • An observational study of 127 preschool children at their homes and daycare centers in Ohio: environmental pathways to cis- and trans-permethrin exposure.

    Marsha K. Morgan;Linda S. Sheldon;Carry W. Croghan;Paul A. Jones

  • The Use of Biomonitoring Data in Exposure and Human Health Risk Assessments

    Richard Albertini;Michael Bird;Nancy Doerrer;Larry Needham

  • The California TEAM study: Breath concentrations and personal exposures to 26 volatile compounds in air and drinking water of 188 residents of Los Angeles, Antioch, and Pittsburg, CA

    Lance A. Wallace;Edo D. Pellizzari;Tyler D. Hartwell;Roy Whitmore

  • Strategic Biomonitoring Initiatives: Moving the Science Forward

    Jürgen Angerer;Michael G. Bird;Thomas A. Burke;Nancy G. Doerrer

  • The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study: part 2. Personal exposure assessment associated with an elderly study population.

    R. Williams;Juanita Suggs;John Creason;Charles Rodes

  • The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study: part 1. Comparison of ambient, residential outdoor, indoor and apartment particulate matter monitoring.

    Ron Williams;Jack Suggs;R Zweidinger;Gary Evans

  • Review of Pesticide Urinary Biomarker Measurements from Selected US EPA Children’s Observational Exposure Studies

    Peter P. Egeghy;Elaine A. Cohen Hubal;Nicolle S. Tulve;Lisa J. Melnyk

  • Indoor, outdoor, and personal exposure monitoring of particulate air pollution: the Baltimore elderly epidemiology-exposure pilot study☆

    Ron Williams;John Creason;Roy Zweidinger;Randall Watts

  • The Research Triangle Park particulate matter panel study: modeling ambient source contribution to personal and residential PM mass concentrations

    Ron Williams;Jack Suggs;Anne Rea;Linda Sheldon

Frequent Co-Authors

Edo D. Pellizzari
Edo D. Pellizzari Research Triangle Park Foundation
Charles Rodes
Charles Rodes RTI International
Lance Wallace
Lance Wallace Environmental Protection Agency
Halûk Özkaynak
Halûk Özkaynak Environmental Protection Agency
Paul J. Lioy
Paul J. Lioy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Dana B. Barr
Dana B. Barr Emory University
Ronald A. Hites
Ronald A. Hites Indiana University
Mustafa Dosemeci
Mustafa Dosemeci National Institutes of Health
Joachim D. Pleil
Joachim D. Pleil University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Dale P. Sandler
Dale P. Sandler National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, branching out into related fields like sociology can enhance understanding of human-environment interactions. Exploring online bachelors degree programs in sociology offers foundational knowledge that complements environmental studies, especially in areas like community impact and policy development.

Educators and practitioners interested in advancing their qualifications might consider programs such as the edd without dissertation, which allows for doctoral achievement without the need for a dissertation. This pathway is ideal for professionals focusing on applied research and leadership roles within environmental education.

Furthermore, individuals holding an EdS (Education Specialist) degree can benefit from an eds to edd bridge program, enabling a seamless transition to a Doctor of Education. This option can be particularly relevant for those concentrating on environmental leadership and policy.

Lastly, pursuing advanced social work expertise through dsw online programs equips professionals to address complex environmental justice issues, advocating for underserved communities affected by ecological changes.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Sheldon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles