World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
26466
World Ranking
11010
National Ranking
5666

Mustafa Dosemeci publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mustafa Dosemeci sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 278 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mustafa Dosemeci D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mustafa Dosemeci sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mustafa Dosemeci is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research profile reflects a focus on academic and scientific investigation, though specific details about their recent papers, publication venues, fields of study, and research topics are not available.

There is no data provided about their frequent co-authors or collaborations, and no information presented on book publications linked to their work. Similarly, main fields, subfields, and topics of study have not been specified in the available records.

Information regarding awards or honors received by Mustafa Dosemeci is also absent, and no indication of their passing is noted, affirming that they are currently living.

Given the lack of detailed publication or research data, it is evident that publicly disclosed information about Mustafa Dosemeci is limited to their current primary institutional affiliation. This profile offers a basic overview aligned with the data presented without extrapolation or assumption.

Best Publications

  • Hematotoxicity in Workers Exposed to Low Levels of Benzene

    Qing Lan;Luoping Zhang;Guilan Li;Roel Vermeulen

  • NAT2 slow acetylation, GSTM1 null genotype, and risk of bladder cancer: results from the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study and meta-analyses.

    Montserrat García-Closas;Núria Malats;Debra Silverman;Mustafa Dosemeci

  • Bladder Cancer and Exposure to Water Disinfection By-Products through Ingestion, Bathing, Showering, and Swimming in Pools

    Cristina M. Villanueva;Kenneth P. Cantor;Joan O. Grimalt;Nuria Malats

  • The Agricultural Health Study.

    Michael C. R. Alavanja;Dale P. Sandler;Suzanne B. McMaster;Shelia Hoar Zahm

  • Use of Agricultural Pesticides and Prostate Cancer Risk in the Agricultural Health Study Cohort

    Michael C. R. Alavanja;Claudine Samanic;Mustafa Dosemeci;Jay Lubin

  • Drinking water source and chlorination byproducts. I. Risk of bladder cancer.

    Kenneth P. Cantor;Charks F. Lynch;Mariana Hildesheim;Mustafa Dosemeci

  • DOES NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION OF EXPOSURE ALWAYS BIAS A TRUE EFFECT TOWARD THE NULL VALUE

    Mustafa Dosemeci;Sholom Wacholder;Jay H. Lubin

  • Benzene and the dose-related incidence of hematologic neoplasms in China. Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine--National Cancer Institute Benzene Study Group.

    R B Hayes;S N Yin;M Dosemeci;G L Li

  • Drinking water source and chlorination byproducts. II. Risk of colon and rectal cancers.

    Mariana E. Hildesheim;Kenneth P. Cantor;Charles F. Lynch;Mustafa Dosemeci

  • Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study.

    Anneclaire J. De Roos;Aaron Blair;Jennifer A. Rusiecki;Jane A. Hoppin

  • Excess incidence of squamous cell esophageal cancer among US Black men: role of social class and other risk factors.

    Linda Morris Brown;Robert Hoover;Debra Silverman;Dalsu Baris

  • Benzene poisoning, a risk factor for hematological malignancy, is associated with the NQO1 609C-->T mutation and rapid fractional excretion of chlorzoxazone.

    Nathaniel Rothman;Martyn T. Smith;Richard B. Hayes;Robert D. Traver

  • Occupational physical activity, socioeconomic status, and risks of 15 cancer sites in Turkey

    Mustafa Dosemeci;Richard B. Hayes;Renate Vetter;Robert N. Hoover

  • Pesticides and Lung Cancer Risk in the Agricultural Health Study Cohort

    Michael C. R. Alavanja;Mustafa Dosemeci;Claudine Samanic;Jay Lubin

  • A Quantitative Approach for Estimating Exposure to Pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study

    Mustafa Dosemeci;Michael C. R. Alavanja;Andrew S. Rowland;David Mage

  • Pooled exposure-response analyses and risk assessment for lung cancer in 10 cohorts of silica-exposed workers: an IARC multicentre study.

    Kyle Steenland;Andrea Mannetje;Paolo Boffetta;Leslie Stayner

  • Evaluation of risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma families in Taiwan

    Xiaohong Yang;Scott Diehl;Ruth Pfeiffer;Chien Jen Chen

  • Genomic DNA hypomethylation as a biomarker for bladder cancer susceptibility in the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study: a case–control study

    Lee E Moore;Ruth M Pfeiffer;Cristina Poscablo;Francisco X Real

  • Potential Occupational Risks for Neurodegenerative Diseases

    Robert M. Park;Paul A. Schulte;Joseph D. Bowman;James T. Walker

  • Leisure-time physical activity and lung cancer: a meta-analysis

    Adonina Tardon;Won Jin Lee;Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez;Mustafa Dosemeci

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron Blair
Aaron Blair National Institutes of Health
Nathaniel Rothman
Nathaniel Rothman National Institutes of Health
Michael C. R. Alavanja
Michael C. R. Alavanja National Institutes of Health
Debra T. Silverman
Debra T. Silverman National Institutes of Health
Núria Malats
Núria Malats Spanish National Cancer Research Centre
Alfredo Carrato
Alfredo Carrato University of Alcalá
Dale P. Sandler
Dale P. Sandler National Institutes of Health
Manolis Kogevinas
Manolis Kogevinas Pompeu Fabra University
Francisco X. Real
Francisco X. Real Pompeu Fabra University
Martha S. Linet
Martha S. Linet National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a career in medicine but exploring online options and alternative pathways, there are several efficient routes to enter or advance in the healthcare field. Online nursing programs are particularly popular, offering flexibility and faster completion times for busy professionals and career changers alike.

Many nurses look for the shortest post master's dnp program to accelerate their qualification process and quickly enhance their clinical and leadership skills. Meanwhile, those wanting to identify programs that are less intensive might appreciate guidance from discussions around the easiest dnp program reddit recommendations, which spotlight programs with manageable workloads and strong student support.

For aspiring nurses, understanding what is the fastest way to become an lpn can help jumpstart a healthcare career with minimal time investment. And for those looking to specialize in mental health, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs are an efficient way to earn advanced credentials in psychiatric nursing.

Whether seeking a quicker pathway to practice or an advanced online degree, these options offer diverse opportunities for aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Mustafa Dosemeci

Recently Published Articles