World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeffrey A. Siegel

Jeffrey A. Siegel

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
7370
World Ranking
5858
National Ranking
251

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
5659
World Ranking
7743
National Ranking
312

Jeffrey A. Siegel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey A. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 179 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jeffrey A. Siegel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey A. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeffrey A. Siegel is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and focuses primarily on Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Speech and Hearing.

The main topics addressed in their work cover a variety of environmental and health-related issues. These include:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Jeffrey A. Siegel has contributed to a number of publications, frequently appearing in several scientific journals and venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • Indoor Air
  • Building and Environment
  • Aerosol Science and Technology
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Energy and Buildings

Their recent papers include:

  • "Personal-Level Protective Actions Against Particulate Matter Air Pollution Exposure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association" (2020, Circulation)
  • "Indoor CO 2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review" (2020, Indoor Air)
  • "Cardiopulmonary Impact of Particulate Air Pollution in High-Risk Populations" (2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • "Electrostatic Precipitators as an Indoor Air Cleaner-A Literature Review" (2020, Sustainability)
  • "Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 RNA signal in a home with COVID-19 positive occupants" (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)

Collaboration is an important aspect of Jeffrey A. Siegel's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Tianyuan Li
  • Bowen Du
  • Miriam L. Diamond
  • Yuchao Wan
  • Sarah R. Haines

Best Publications

  • Response–relapse patterns of building occupant electricity consumption following exposure to personal, contextualized and occupant peer network utilization data

    Gabriel Peschiera;John E. Taylor;Jeffrey A. Siegel

  • Ultrafine particle removal and generation by portable air cleaners

    Michael S. Waring;Jeffrey A. Siegel;Richard L. Corsi

  • Personal-Level Protective Actions Against Particulate Matter Air Pollution Exposure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Sanjay Rajagopalan;Michael Brauer;Aruni Bhatnagar;Deepak L. Bhatt

  • Ten questions concerning the microbiomes of buildings

    Rachel I. Adams;Seema Bhangar;Karen C. Dannemiller;Jonathan A. Eisen

  • Indoor environmental quality in social housing: A literature review

    Ernesto Diaz Lozano Patino;Jeffrey A. Siegel

  • The relationship between filter pressure drop, indoor air quality, and energy consumption in rooftop HVAC units

    Marwa Zaatari;Atila Novoselac;Jeffrey Siegel

  • Phthalates and organophosphates in settled dust and HVAC filter dust of U.S. low-income homes: Association with season, building characteristics, and childhood asthma.

    Chenyang Bi;Juan P. Maestre;Hongwan Li;Ge Zhang

  • Indoor CO2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review.

    Bowen Du;Marlie C. Tandoc;Michael L. Mack;Jeffrey A. Siegel

  • Geography and location are the primary drivers of office microbiome composition

    John H Chase;Jennifer Fouquier;Mahnaz Zare;Derek L Sonderegger

  • Penetration of ambient submicron particles into single‐family residences and associations with building characteristics

    B. Stephens;J. A. Siegel

  • Particle loading rates for HVAC filters, heat exchangers, and ducts.

    M. S. Waring;J. A. Siegel

  • Formaldehyde in residences: long-term indoor concentrations and influencing factors.

    Diana E. Hun;Richard L. Corsi;Maria T. Morandi;Jeffrey A. Siegel

  • Primary and secondary consequences of indoor air cleaners

    J. A. Siegel

  • Ozone removal by HVAC filters

    P. Zhao;J. A. Siegel;Richard L Corsi

  • Particle resuspension during the use of vacuum cleaners on residential carpet.

    Richard L. Corsi;Jeffrey A. Siegel;Chunyi Chiang

  • Evaluation of HVAC filters as a sampling mechanism for indoor microbial communities

    Federico Noris;Jeffrey A. Siegel;Kerry A. Kinney

  • Predicting particle deposition on HVAC heat exchangers

    Jeffrey A. Siegel;William W. Nazaroff

  • The Effects of Filtration on Pressure Drop and Energy Consumption in Residential HVAC Systems (RP-1299)

    Brent Stephens;Atila Novoselac;Jeffrey A. Siegel

  • Personal reactive clouds: Introducing the concept of near-head chemistry

    Richard L Corsi;J. Siegel;A. Karamalegos;H. Simon

  • Cardiopulmonary Impact of Particulate Air Pollution in High-Risk Populations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

    Jonathan D. Newman;Deepak L. Bhatt;Sanjay Rajagopalan;John R. Balmes

  • Ultrafine particle removal by residential heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning filters

    B. Stephens;J. A. Siegel;J. A. Siegel

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Corsi
Richard L. Corsi University of California, Davis
Atila Novoselac
Atila Novoselac The University of Texas at Austin
Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Maria C. G. Juenger
Maria C. G. Juenger The University of Texas at Austin
William W. Nazaroff
William W. Nazaroff University of California, Berkeley
Heather L. MacLean
Heather L. MacLean University of Toronto
J. Gregory Caporaso
J. Gregory Caporaso Northern Arizona University
Michael Brauer
Michael Brauer University of British Columbia
Jordan Peccia
Jordan Peccia Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many aspiring professionals opt for geoscience-focused programs, which provide in-depth knowledge of earth systems. Exploring a geoscience online degree can offer flexibility along with strong scientific foundations crucial for environmental work.

Another closely linked field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), essential for spatial analysis and environmental data management. Those keen on mapping and technology can benefit from specialized gis degree programs, which prepare graduates for roles in urban planning, conservation, and resource management.

For students seeking a quicker route to enhance public sector leadership or policy roles, many universities offer mpa one year programs. These degrees help professionals understand environmental governance and sustainability practices from an administrative perspective.

While Environmental Science can be challenging, some may prefer exploring the easiest bachelor degree to get options to find a balance between course demands and career goals. Integrating these related academic paths can significantly enhance job prospects in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey A. Siegel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles