World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
11443
World Ranking
7067
National Ranking
3103

Paul Ammann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Ammann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paul Ammann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Ammann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Ammann is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States and works primarily within the intersecting domains of computer science, business, management, and engineering. Their research covers several subfields, including software, strategy and management, management of technology and innovation, mechanical engineering, and hardware and architecture.

The scientist's work focuses on a range of topics, notably software testing and debugging techniques, corporate governance and management, digital innovation in industries, mechanical failure analysis and simulation, VLSI and analog circuit testing, radiation effects in electronics, and software reliability and analysis research.

Paul Ammann has contributed to multiple publications across a variety of reputable venues. Recent works include:

  • "Prioritizing mutants to guide mutation testing," 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • "CONFETTI," 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • "Flaky and True Failures Logs to Accompany '230,439 Test Failures Later: An Empirical Evaluation of Flaky Failure Classifiers'," 2024, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "230,439 Test Failures Later: An Empirical Evaluation of Flaky Failure Classifiers," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Flaky and True Failures Logs to Accompany '230,439 Test Failures Later: An Empirical Evaluation of Flaky Failure Classifiers'," 2024, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Paul Ammann frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Jonathan Bell, Abdulrahman Alshammari, Michael Hilton, Samuel J. Kaufman, and Ryan Featherman.

Their book publication record includes one known title published by Springer Nature:

  • "Marktsegmentierung für Industriegütermärkte," 2021

The publication venues where Ammann's work appears reflect the research focus, featuring conferences and repositories such as the Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, Zenodo by CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, and arXiv from Cornell University.

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Software Testing

    Paul Ammann;Jeff Offutt

  • Scalable, graph-based network vulnerability analysis

    Paul Ammann;Duminda Wijesekera;Saket Kaushik

  • Introduction to Software Testing: List of Figures

    Paul Ammann;Jeff Offutt

  • Using model checking to analyze network vulnerabilities

    R.W. Ritchey;P. Ammann

  • Data diversity: an approach to software fault tolerance

    P.E. Ammann;J.C. Knight

  • Using model checking to generate tests from specifications

    P.E. Ammann;P.E. Black;W. Majurski

  • Generating test data from state-based specifications

    A. Jefferson Offutt;Shaoying Liu;Aynur Abdurazik;Paul Ammann

  • Testing with model checkers: a survey

    Gordon Fraser;Franz Wotawa;Paul E. Ammann

  • Testing with model checkers: a survey

    Unknown

  • A weakest-adversary security metric for network configuration security analysis

    Joseph Pamula;Sushil Jajodia;Paul Ammann;Vipin Swarup

  • Recovery from malicious transactions

    P. Ammann;S. Jajodia;Peng Liu

  • Establishing Theoretical Minimal Sets of Mutants

    Paul Ammann;Marcio Eduardo Delamaro;Jeff Offutt

  • Using formal methods to derive test frames in category-partition testing

    P. Ammann;J. Offutt

  • A SPECIFICATION-BASED COVERAGE METRIC TO EVALUATE TEST SETS

    Paul E. Ammann;Paul E. Black

  • Surviving information warfare attacks on databases

    P. Ammann;S. Jajodia;C.D. McCollum;B.T. Blaustein

  • A host-based approach to network attack chaining analysis

    P. Ammann;J. Pamula;R. Ritchey;J. Street

  • Coverage criteria for logical expressions

    P. Ammann;J. Offutt;Hong Huang

  • Rewriting Histories: Recovering from Malicious Transactions

    Peng Liu;Paul Ammann;Sushil Jajodia

  • A specification-based coverage metric to evaluate test sets

    P.E. Ammann;P.E. Black

  • Mutation operators for testing Android apps

    Lin Deng;Jeff Offutt;Paul Ammann;Nariman Mirzaei

  • Mutant Subsumption Graphs

    Bob Kurtz;Paul Ammann;Marcio E. Delamaro;Jeff Offutt

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff Offutt
Jeff Offutt George Mason University
Sushil Jajodia
Sushil Jajodia George Mason University
John C. Knight
John C. Knight University of Virginia
Duminda Wijesekera
Duminda Wijesekera George Mason University
Ravi Sandhu
Ravi Sandhu The University of Texas at San Antonio
Indrakshi Ray
Indrakshi Ray Colorado State University
Gordon Fraser
Gordon Fraser University of Passau
Franz Wotawa
Franz Wotawa Graz University of Technology
Wei Ding
Wei Ding University of Massachusetts Boston
Pierangela Samarati
Pierangela Samarati University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open many doors for students interested in computer science and related fields. Choosing an online bachelor degree can be a cost-effective way to begin your academic journey, providing flexibility and affordability compared to traditional programs.

For those who want a technical edge, pursuing an online bachelor's in engineering offers a strong foundation in problem-solving and innovation—qualities highly valued in the tech industry.

Looking to advance into tech leadership or management roles? An online executive mba can equip computer science professionals with valuable business, strategy, and leadership skills. This helps open doors to higher-level positions in tech organizations.

Computer science knowledge is also increasingly important in non-traditional tech fields. For example, an accredited library science degree online blends technology and information science—preparing students for digital librarian, data curator, and similar roles.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Ammann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles