World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
9406
World Ranking
5905
National Ranking
225

Yvan Labiche publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yvan Labiche sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yvan Labiche D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yvan Labiche sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yvan Labiche is affiliated with Carleton University in Canada and specializes primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields including Software, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Science Applications.

Their work mainly addresses key topics such as Software Engineering Research, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, and Open Source Software Innovations.

Yvan Labiche has contributed to multiple recent publications, which include:

  • How consistency is handled in model-driven software engineering and UML: an expert opinion survey, 2022, Software Quality Journal
  • Predictors of Software Metric Correlation: A Non-parametric Analysis, 2021, 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)
  • Interface control document modeling with Citrus (avionics systems interfaces), 2022, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer

The scholar frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Damiano Torre
  • Marcela Genero
  • Maged Elaasar
  • Daniel Afriyie
  • Hassna Louadah

Yvan Labiche's published works often appear in well-regarded venues such as:

  • Software Quality Journal
  • 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer

Best Publications

  • Is mutation an appropriate tool for testing experiments

    J. H. Andrews;L. C. Briand;Y. Labiche

  • Using Mutation Analysis for Assessing and Comparing Testing Coverage Criteria

    J.H. Andrews;L.C. Briand;Y. Labiche;A.S. Namin

  • A UML-Based Approach to System Testing

    Lionel C. Briand;Yvan Labiche

  • Is mutation an appropriate tool for testing experiments? [software testing]

    J.H. Andrews;L.C. Briand;Y. Labiche

  • Impact analysis and change management of UML models

    L.C. Briand;Y. Labiche;L. O'Sullivan

  • A UML-Based Approach to System Testing

    Lionel C. Briand;Yvan Labiche

  • Toward the Reverse Engineering of UML Sequence Diagrams for Distributed Java Software

    L.C. Briand;Y. Labiche;J. Leduc

  • The impact of UML documentation on software maintenance: an experimental evaluation

    E. Arisholm;L.C. Briand;S.E. Hove;Y. Labiche

  • A systematic review of transformation approaches between user requirements and analysis models

    Tao Yue_aff n;Lionel C. Briand;Yvan Labiche

  • Automating regression test selection based on UML designs

    L. C. Briand;Y. Labiche;S. He

  • An investigation of graph-based class integration test order strategies

    L.C. Briand;Y. Labiche;Yihong Wang

  • Automating impact analysis and regression test selection based on UML designs

    L.C. Briand;Y. Labiche;G. Soccar

  • Assessing and improving state-based class testing: a series of experiments

    L.C. Briand;M. Di Penta;Y. Labiche

  • An experimental investigation of formality in UML-based development

    L.C. Briand;Y. Labiche;M. Di Penta;H. Yan-Bondoc

  • Automated impact analysis of UML models

    L. C. Briand;Y. Labiche;L. O'Sullivan;M. M. Sówka

  • Stress testing real-time systems with genetic algorithms

    Lionel C. Briand;Yvan Labiche;Marwa Shousha

  • Solving the Class Responsibility Assignment Problem in Object-Oriented Analysis with Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms

    Michael Bowman;Lionel C Briand;Yvan Labiche

  • Facilitating the transition from use case models to analysis models: Approach and experiments

    Tao Yue;Lionel C. Briand;Yvan Labiche

  • Using Machine Learning to Support Debugging with Tarantula

    Lionel C. Briand;Yvan Labiche;Xuetao Liu

  • Using simulation to empirically investigate test coverage criteria based on statechart

    L. C. Briand;Y. Labiche;Y. Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Lionel C. Briand
Lionel C. Briand University of Ottawa
Marcela Genero
Marcela Genero University of Castilla-La Mancha
Francois Gagnon
Francois Gagnon École de Technologie Supérieure
Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc
Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc Concordia University
Antonia Bertolino
Antonia Bertolino National Research Council (CNR)
Giuliano Antoniol
Giuliano Antoniol Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up a wide range of online study options and career pathways. Many students pursue advanced qualifications to stay competitive in the technology job market or expand their interdisciplinary knowledge.

For those interested in data-driven careers, considering the cheapest online data science masters can be a practical way to build expertise in artificial intelligence, analytics, and machine learning without incurring significant debt.

If you’re looking to fast-track your career in sectors beyond traditional computer science roles, you might explore the best 2 year construction management degree online. This path blends technology skills with project management, preparing graduates for critical roles in the growing construction industry.

For business-minded students, an MBA remains a top choice. The cheapest 1 year online mba programs enable professionals to upskill quickly in management, finance, and entrepreneurship.

Looking for a quick yet impactful qualification? Consider enrolling in a 1 year masters program to gain advanced knowledge and boost your employability in a short timeframe.

Best Scientists Citing Yvan Labiche

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles