World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7030
World Ranking
9288
National Ranking
458

Jan Jürjens publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Jürjens sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 241 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jan Jürjens D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Jürjens sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Jürjens is affiliated with the University of Koblenz and Landau in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with 63 publications covering diverse subfields such as information systems, artificial intelligence, management science and operations research, computer networks and communications, and management information systems.

The scientist's main research topics include software engineering research, service-oriented architecture and web services, software engineering techniques and practices, business process modeling and analysis, information and cyber security, data quality and management, and advanced malware detection techniques.

Jan Jürjens has contributed to several papers in various venues. Recent publications include:

  • A semi-automated BPMN-based framework for detecting conflicts between security, data-minimization, and fairness requirements (2020, Software & Systems Modeling)
  • Ontology-driven evolution of software security (2021, Data & Knowledge Engineering)
  • Checking security compliance between models and code (2022, Software & Systems Modeling)
  • Requirements document relations (2022, Software & Systems Modeling)
  • Selecting a Secure Cloud Provider-An Empirical Study and Multi Criteria Approach (2020, Information)

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Katharina Großer, Marco Konersmann, Sven Peldszus, Marco Ehl, and Amir Shayan Ahmadian.

Jan Jürjens has published in prominent venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), Software & Systems Modeling, Data & Knowledge Engineering, and Information.

Among their book publications, Jan Jürjens has authored "Visual Privacy Management," published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2020.

Best Publications

  • UMLsec: Extending UML for Secure Systems Development

    Jan Jürjens

  • Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany

    Harrison Stewart;Jan Jürjens

  • Towards Development of Secure Systems Using UMLsec

    Jan Jürjens

  • Comparing bug finding tools with reviews and tests

    Stefan Wagner;Jan Jürjens;Claudia Koller;Peter Trischberger

  • Formal Eavesdropping and Its Computational Interpretation

    Martín Abadi;Jan Jürjens

  • Eliciting security requirements and tracing them to design: an integration of Common Criteria, heuristics, and UMLsec

    Siv Hilde Houmb;Shareeful Islam;Eric Knauss;Jan Jürjens

  • Sound methods and effective tools for model-based security engineering with UML

    Jan Jürjens

  • Model-Based Security Engineering of Distributed Information Systems Using UMLsec

    Bastian Best;Jan Jurjens;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Using UMLsec and goal trees for secure systems development

    Jan Jürjens

  • Information security management and the human aspect in organizations

    Harrison Stewart;Jan Jürjens

  • Specification-Based Testing of Firewalls

    Jan Jürjens;Guido Wimmel

  • Specification-Based Test Generation for Security-Critical Systems Using Mutations

    Guido Wimmel;Jan Jürjens

  • Guiding a general-purpose C verifier to prove cryptographic protocols

    François Dupressoir;Andrew D. Gordon;Jan Jürjens;David A. Naumann

  • Extracting and verifying cryptographic models from C protocol code by symbolic execution

    Mihhail Aizatulin;Andrew D. Gordon;Jan Jürjens

  • From goal‐driven security requirements engineering to secure design

    Unknown

  • Tools for secure systems development with UML

    Jan Jürjens;Pasha Shabalin

  • Model-based security analysis for mobile communications

    Jan Jürjens;Joerg Schreck;Peter Bartmann

  • Automated Verification of UMLsec Models for Security Requirements

    Jan Jürjens;Pasha Shabalin

  • Secrecy-preserving refinement

    Jan Jürjens

  • Security Analysis of Crypto-based Java Programs using Automated Theorem Provers

    J. Jurjens

  • Developing safety-critical systems with UML

    Jan Jürjens

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Schneider
Kurt Schneider University of Hannover
Yijun Yu
Yijun Yu The Open University
Haralambos Mouratidis
Haralambos Mouratidis University of Essex
Bashar Nuseibeh
Bashar Nuseibeh The Open University
Andrew D. Gordon
Andrew D. Gordon Microsoft (United States)
Steffen Staab
Steffen Staab University of Stuttgart
Eduardo B. Fernandez
Eduardo B. Fernandez Florida Atlantic University
Eduardo Fernández-Medina
Eduardo Fernández-Medina University of Castilla-La Mancha
Stefan Wagner
Stefan Wagner University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about your next steps after studying Computer Science in the USA? There are many flexible online degree options to help you advance your career or pivot within the tech industry.

For those looking to gain business expertise, pursuing an affordable online MBA can unlock leadership opportunities in tech-focused organizations. If time is of the essence, consider exploring 1 year master's programs online to quickly enhance your credentials without a long-term commitment.

Some students may seek fast, practical qualifications that boost earning potential—review a list of quick online degrees that pay well to find options that match your interests and goals. For those with a strong interest in emerging technologies, enrolling in an ai degree online can position you at the forefront of innovation.

Each of these pathways can complement your background in Computer Science and open exciting doors in today's competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Jürjens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles