World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
5956
World Ranking
5644
National Ranking
368

Edith Elkind publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith Elkind sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 190 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Edith Elkind D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith Elkind sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edith Elkind is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several key areas in economics, computer science, and decision sciences, focusing particularly on game theory, auction theory, and computational social choice.

Their principal fields of study include:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Decision Sciences
  • Computer Science

Subfields of study connected to their work cover:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Safety Research

The main research topics addressed in their publications comprise:

  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Edith Elkind's recent papers include the following:

  • Price of Pareto Optimality in hedonic games, 2020, Artificial Intelligence
  • Schelling games on graphs, 2021, Artificial Intelligence
  • Preference Restrictions in Computational Social Choice: A Survey, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Stability Via Convexity and LP Duality in OCF Games, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Mind the gap: Cake cutting with separation, 2022, Artificial Intelligence

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Edith Elkind include:

  • Nicholas Teh
  • Warut Suksompong
  • Paul W. Goldberg
  • Nimrod Talmon
  • Piotr Faliszewski

Their work has been published frequently in these venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Social Choice and Welfare

In addition to articles, Edith Elkind has contributed to book publications. One notable book is Distributed Artificial Intelligence, published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Justified representation in approval-based committee voting

    Haris Aziz;Markus Brill;Vincent Conitzer;Edith Elkind

  • Properties of multiwinner voting rules.

    Edith Elkind;Piotr Faliszewski;Piotr Skowron;Arkadii Slinko

  • Frugality in path auctions

    Edith Elkind;Amit Sahai;Ken Steiglitz

  • Cooperative games with overlapping coalitions

    Georgios Chalkiadakis;Edith Elkind;Evangelos Markakis;Maria Polukarov

  • Approximating optimal social choice under metric preferences

    Elliot Anshelevich;Onkar Bhardwaj;Edith Elkind;John Postl

  • Swap Bribery

    Edith Elkind;Piotr Faliszewski;Arkadii Slinko

  • Computational complexity of weighted threshold games

    Edith Elkind;Leslie Ann Goldberg;Paul Goldberg;Michael Wooldridge

  • The Cost of Stability in Coalitional Games

    Yoram Bachrach;Edith Elkind;Reshef Meir;Dmitrii Pasechnik

  • Equilibria of plurality voting with abstentions

    Yvo Desmedt;Edith Elkind

  • Hybrid voting protocols and hardness of manipulation

    Edith Elkind;Helger Lipmaa

  • Hedonic coalition nets

    Edith Elkind;Michael Wooldridge

  • Manipulating the quota in weighted voting games

    Michael Zuckerman;Piotr Faliszewski;Yoram Bachrach;Edith Elkind

  • Cooperative Game Theory: Basic Concepts and Computational Challenges

    G. Chalkiadakis;E. Elkind;M. Wooldridge

  • The complexity of fully proportional representation for single-crossing electorates

    Piotr Skowron;Lan Yu;Piotr Faliszewski;Edith Elkind

  • Proportional Justified Representation

    Luis Sánchez Fernández;Edith Elkind;Martin Lackner;Norberto Fernández García

  • Group activity selection problem

    Andreas Darmann;Edith Elkind;Sascha Kurz;Jérôme Lang

  • Nash equilibria in graphical games on trees revisited

    Edith Elkind;Leslie Ann Goldberg;Paul Goldberg

  • Manipulating Opinion Diffusion in Social Networks

    Robert Bredereck;Edith Elkind

  • Fair division of a graph

    Sylvain Bouveret;Katarína Cechlárová;Edith Elkind;Ayumi Igarashi

  • Clone structures in voters' preferences

    Edith Elkind;Piotr Faliszewski;Arkadii Slinko

  • Constrained coalition formation

    Talal Rahwan;Tomasz Michalak;Edith Elkind;Piotr Faliszewski

  • Proportional Justified Representation

    Luis Sánchez-Fernández;Edith Elkind;Martin Lackner;Norberto Fernández

  • On the Complexity of Extended and Proportional Justified Representation.

    Haris Aziz;Edith Elkind;Shenwei Huang;Martin Lackner

Frequent Co-Authors

Piotr Faliszewski
Piotr Faliszewski AGH University of Science and Technology
Michael Wooldridge
Michael Wooldridge University of Oxford
Nicholas R. Jennings
Nicholas R. Jennings Loughborough University
Leslie Ann Goldberg
Leslie Ann Goldberg University of Oxford
Paul Goldberg
Paul Goldberg Boston University
Yoram Bachrach
Yoram Bachrach DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Haris Aziz
Haris Aziz University of New South Wales
Jérôme Lang
Jérôme Lang Paris Dauphine University
Helger Lipmaa
Helger Lipmaa University of Tartu
Doron Peled
Doron Peled Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees linked to engineering and technology can open doors to a range of dynamic career paths. For example, professionals interested in leadership roles in tech industries may consider the project management degree salary potential, as demand rises for managers who can lead complex projects and teams.

The rise of digital currencies and smart technologies has made it essential for technology professionals to understand fintech and its applications. Programs like blockchain degree programs provide a foundation for careers in blockchain development, cryptocurrency, and financial innovation.

Technology is also transforming non-traditional tech fields. For example, earning an online sports management degree prepares students for data-driven decision-making and tech integration in the sports industry, responding to a growing need for analytics and digital management skills.

Urbanization and digital infrastructure demands continue to surge, making urban planning more reliant on technology. Choosing a urban planning online degree helps equip you with the skills to address smart city challenges and sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Edith Elkind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles