World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Linda M. Williams

Linda M. Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6813 6347 3695 3356 91 14409

Linda M. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda M. Williams between 1979 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda M. Williams published across 46 years, from 1979 to 2024, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2015. 4 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2015. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications
1979 2024

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda M. Williams: publications per year, 1979 to 2024
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 3
1994 4
1995 4
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 1
2012 2
2013 8
2014 2
2015 10
2016 3
2017 3
2018 0
2019 2
2020 1
2021 2
2022 2
2023 1
2024 3
Total 103
Download as CSV

Linda M. Williams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 91
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda M. Williams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda M. Williams is affiliated with Wellesley College in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on issues related to sexual assault and victimization, with an emphasis on the intersection of criminal justice processes and victim experiences.

The main fields of study include Social Sciences and Psychology, with additional work within subfields such as Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, and Health.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects, notably:

  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Linda M. Williams has published in several scholarly venues with multiple contributions in Child Abuse & Neglect. Other publication venues include:

  • Policing An International Journal
  • Victims & Offenders
  • Child Maltreatment
  • Criminal Justice Policy Review

Their recent papers include:

  • "Responding to Sexual Assault on Campus: A National Assessment and Systematic Classification of the Scope and Challenges for Investigation and Adjudication" (2021), CrimRxiv
  • "Moving Forward While Looking Back: Understanding the Influence of a 'Test All' SAK Mandate on Sexual Assault Case Attrition" (2024), Criminal Justice Policy Review
  • "Predictors of Prosecutorial Decisions in Reports of Child Sexual Abuse" (2022), Child Maltreatment
  • "Pathways to Sexual Assault Case Attrition: Culture, Context, and Case Clearance" (2021), Victims & Offenders
  • "Vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress or burnout?: an exploratory study of the effects of investigating sexual assault cases on detectives" (2020), Policing An International Journal

Frequent co-authors working collaboratively with Linda M. Williams include:

  • April Pattavina
  • Melissa S. Morabito
  • Stephanie D. Block
  • Hannah Johnson
  • Kristy L. Shockley

Best Publications

  • Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies

    Kathleen A. Kendall-Tackett;Linda M. Williams;David Finkelhor

  • Recall of Childhood Trauma: A Prospective Study of Women's Memories of Child Sexual Abuse.

    Linda Meyer Williams

  • The long-term mental health consequences of child sexual abuse: An exploratory study of the impact of multiple traumas in a sample of women

    Victoria L. Banyard;Linda M. Williams;Jane A. Siegel

  • Nursery Crimes: Sexual Abuse in Day Care

    David Finkelhor;Linda Meyer Williams;Nanci Burns

  • Recovered memories of abuse in women with documented child sexual victimization histories

    Linda M. Williams

  • The impact of complex trauma and depression on parenting: an exploration of mediating risk and protective factors.

    Victoria L. Banyard;Linda M. Williams;Jane A. Siegel

  • The Relationship Between Child Sexual Abuse And Female Delinquency And Crime: A Prospective Study

    Jane A. Siegel;Linda M. Williams

  • Mentoring college-age women: a relational approach.

    Belle Liang;Allison J. Tracy;Catherine A. Taylor;Linda M. Williams

  • Partner Violence: A Comprehensive Review of 20 Years of Research

    Jana L. Jasinski;Linda Meyer Williams;David Finkelhor;Murray Arnold Straus

  • Cognitive-behavioral and patient education interventions in cardiac catheterization procedures: the Palo Alto Medical Psychology Project.

    Philip C. Kendall;Linda Williams;Terry F. Pechacek;Lewis E. Graham

  • THE RELATIONAL HEALTH INDICES: A STUDY OF WOMEN'S RELATIONSHIPS

    Belle Liang;Allison Tracy;Catherine A. Taylor;Linda M. Williams

  • Women's voices on recovery: a multi-method study of the complexity of recovery from child sexual abuse.

    Victoria L. Banyard;Linda M. Williams

  • Childhood sexual abuse: a gender perspective on context and consequences.

    Victoria L. Banyard;Linda M. Williams;Jane A. Siegel

  • Encouraging Responses in Sexual and Relationship Violence Prevention What Program Effects Remain 1 Year Later

    Mary M. Moynihan;Victoria L. Banyard;Alison C. Cares;Sharyn J. Potter

  • Adult sexual revictimization among black women sexually abused in childhood: a prospective examination of serious consequences of abuse.

    Carolyn M. West;Linda M. Williams;Jane A. Siegel

  • Sexual Assault in Marriage: Prevalence, Consequences, and Treatment of Wife Rape

    Patricia Mahoney;Linda M. Williams

  • Changing Attitudes About Being a Bystander to Violence: Translating an In-Person Sexual Violence Prevention Program to a New Campus

    Alison C. Cares;Victoria L. Banyard;Mary M. Moynihan;Linda M. Williams

  • Relational Outcomes of Childhood Sexual Trauma in Female Survivors A Longitudinal Study

    Belle Liang;Linda M. Williams;Jane A. Siegel

  • Risk Factors for Sexual Victimization of Women Results from a Prospective Study

    Jane A. Siegel;Linda M. Williams

  • Gender differences in mental health service needs among youths entering a juvenile detention center.

    Richard Dembo;Linda Williams;James Schmeidler

Frequent Co-Authors

Victoria L. Banyard
Victoria L. Banyard Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
David Finkelhor
David Finkelhor University of New Hampshire
James Schmeidler
James Schmeidler Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Richard Dembo
Richard Dembo University of South Florida
Benjamin E. Saunders
Benjamin E. Saunders Medical University of South Carolina
Mary M. Moynihan
Mary M. Moynihan University of New Hampshire
Murray A. Straus
Murray A. Straus University of New Hampshire
Rochelle F. Hanson
Rochelle F. Hanson Medical University of South Carolina
Eric D. Wish
Eric D. Wish University of Maryland, College Park
Richard E. Heyman
Richard E. Heyman New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of meaningful careers, especially in mental health and social services. Many students enhance their education by pairing Psychology with related online degrees, such as Social Work, to boost their impact and career opportunities.

If you're interested in the fastest route, consider exploring the fastest online social work degrees in Tennessee—an option for those looking to enter the workforce quickly. Affordability is also a top concern. For cost-conscious students, there are several cheapest online bsw programs in Pennsylvania and other budget-friendly alternatives nationwide.

To broaden your search, check out the cheapest online bsw programs in USA, which highlight affordable options across the country. Those specifically interested in studying in the Northwest may want to look into the most affordable online social work degree programs in Boise.

Ultimately, combining Psychology with Social Work can lead to diverse roles in counseling, community development, or case management. Online programs make these pathways more flexible and accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Linda M. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles