World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
9774
World Ranking
5718
National Ranking
2524

Daryl E. Bohning publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daryl E. Bohning sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daryl E. Bohning D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daryl E. Bohning sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daryl E. Bohning is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within medicine and neuroscience, with particular attention to radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader fields, their subfields of study further specify interest in:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Key topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Their publication record includes contributions to venues such as:

  • Brain Stimulation

One notable paper authored by Bohning is titled "Decreased interhemispheric connectivity and increased cortical excitability in unmedicated schizophrenia: A prefrontal interleaved TMS fMRI study", published in Brain Stimulation in 2020.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Ryan Webler
  • Carmen Hamady
  • Chris Molnar
  • Kevin A. Johnson
  • Leo Bonilha

Best Publications

  • A potential role for thalamocingulate circuitry in human maternal behavior.

    Jeffrey P. Lorberbaum;Jeffrey P. Lorberbaum;John D. Newman;Amy R. Horwitz;Judy R. Dubno

  • A combined TMS/fMRI study of intensity-dependent TMS over motor cortex.

    Daryl E. Bohning;Ananda Shastri;Kathleen A. McConnell;Ziad Nahas

  • Consensus paper: Combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging

    Hartwig R. Siebner;Hartwig R. Siebner;Til O. Bergmann;Sven Bestmann;Sven Bestmann;Marcello Massimini

  • How Coil–Cortex Distance Relates to Age, Motor Threshold, and Antidepressant Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    F. A. Kozel;Z. Nahas;C. DeBrux;M. Molloy

  • Neural correlates of speech anticipatory anxiety in generalized social phobia.

    Jeffrey P Lorberbaum;Samet Kose;Michael R Johnson;George W Arana

  • The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex

    Kathleen A McConnell;Ziad Nahas;Ananda Shastri;Jeffrey P Lorberbaum

  • A review of functional neuroimaging studies of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).

    Jeong Ho Chae;Ziad Nahas;Mikhail Lomarev;Stewart Denslow

  • Unilateral left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) produces intensity-dependent bilateral effects as measured by interleaved BOLD fMRI

    Ziad Nahas;Mikhail Lomarev;Donna R Roberts;Ananda Shastri

  • Echoplanar BOLD fMRI of brain activation induced by concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Daryl E. Bohning;Ananda Shastri;Ziad Nahas;Jeff P. Lorberbaum

  • Acute left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation in depressed patients is associated with immediately increased activity in prefrontal cortical as well as subcortical regions

    Xingbao Li;Ziad Nahas;F.Andrew Kozel;Berry Anderson

  • Decreased brain activation during a working memory task at rested baseline is associated with vulnerability to sleep deprivation.

    Qiwen Mu;Alexander Mishory;Kevin A. Johnson;Ziad Nahas

  • Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) synchronized BOLD fMRI suggests that VNS in depressed adults has frequency/dose dependent effects.

    Mikhail Lomarev;Stewart Denslow;Ziad Nahas;Jeong Ho Chae;Jeong Ho Chae

  • Regional Brain Activity in Women Grieving a Romantic Relationship Breakup.

    Arif Najib;Jeffrey P. Lorberbaum;Samet Kose;Daryl E. Bohning

  • Decreased cortical response to verbal working memory following sleep deprivation.

    Qiwen Mu;Ziad Nahas;Kevin A. Johnson;Kaori Yamanaka

  • Mapping transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) fields in vivo with MRI.

    Bohning De;Pecheny Ap;Epstein Cm;Speer Am

  • BOLD-f MRI response to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

    Daryl E. Bohning;Ananda Shastri;Eric M. Wassermann;Ulf Ziemann

  • Brain effects of TMS delivered over prefrontal cortex in depressed adults: role of stimulation frequency and coil-cortex distance.

    Nahas Z;Teneback Cc;Kozel A;Speer Am

  • A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men

    F. Andrew Kozel;Letty J. Revell;Jeffrey P. Lorberbaum;Ananda Shastri

  • Serial vagus nerve stimulation functional MRI in treatment-resistant depression

    Ziad Nahas;Charlotte Teneback;Jeong Ho Chae;Qiwen Mu

  • Feasibility of vagus nerve stimulation-synchronized blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI

    Daryl E. Bohning;Mikhail P. Lomarev;Stewart Denslow;Ziad Nahas

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina
Ziad Nahas
Ziad Nahas University of Minnesota
Xingbao Li
Xingbao Li Medical University of South Carolina
Klaus L. Leenders
Klaus L. Leenders University Medical Center Groningen
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Nick S. Ward
Nick S. Ward University College London
Tomáš Paus
Tomáš Paus University of Toronto
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
Sven Bestmann
Sven Bestmann University College London
Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daryl E. Bohning

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles