World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christiane K. Kuhl

Christiane K. Kuhl

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
29206
World Ranking
18992
National Ranking
997

Christiane K. Kuhl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christiane K. Kuhl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 521 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Christiane K. Kuhl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christiane K. Kuhl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christiane K. Kuhl is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main subfields of study for this scientist include:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Biomedical Engineering

Key topics covered in their work are:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Several frequent co-authors have collaborated extensively with Christiane K. Kuhl, including:

  • Daniel Truhn
  • Sven Nebelung
  • Peter Isfort
  • Maximilian Schulze-Hagen
  • Jakob Nikolas Kather

The scientist's publications are often featured in notable venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Radiology
  • European Radiology

Recent significant papers by this scientist include:

  • Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning, 2021, Nature
  • Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening, 2020, JAMA
  • Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), 2022, European Radiology
  • Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for 3D medical image generation, 2023, Scientific Reports
  • Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline, 2022, Annals of Oncology

Best Publications

  • Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

    Christiane Katharina Kuhl;Peter Mielcareck;Sven Klaschik;Claudia Leutner

  • Mammography, Breast Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Women at High Familial Risk for Breast Cancer

    Christiane K. Kuhl;Simone Schrading;Claudia C. Leutner;Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz

  • MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer

    Constance D. Lehman;Constantine Gatsonis;Christiane K. Kuhl;R. Edward Hendrick

  • The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

    Christiane Kuhl

  • Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging

    R. M. Mann;C. K. Kuhl;K. Kinkel;C. Boetes

  • MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study

    Christiane K Kuhl;Simone Schrading;Heribert B Bieling;Eva Wardelmann

  • Breast MR Imaging Screening in 192 Women Proved or Suspected to Be Carriers of a Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene: Preliminary Results

    Christiane Katharina Kuhl;Rita K. Schmutzler;Claudia Christiane Leutner;Andrea Kempe

  • Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: Multicenter study

    Mitchell D. Schnall;Jeffrey Blume;David A. Bluemke;Gia A. DeAngelis

  • Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): First Postcontrast Subtracted Images and Maximum-Intensity Projection—A Novel Approach to Breast Cancer Screening With MRI

    Christiane K. Kuhl;Simone Schrading;Kevin Strobel;Hans H. Schild

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy

    David A. Bluemke;Constantine A. Gatsonis;Mei Hsiu Chen;Gia A. DeAngelis

  • Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Refine Management Recommendations for Women at Elevated Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: The EVA Trial

    Christiane Kuhl;Stefanie Weigel;Simone Schrading;Birke Arand

  • Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency.

    C K Kuhl;H B Bieling;J Gieseke;B P Kreft

  • Aortic dissection: a comparative study of diagnosis with spiral CT, multiplanar transesophageal echocardiography, and MR imaging.

    T Sommer;W Fehske;N Holzknecht;A V Smekal

  • Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications.

    Christiane K Kuhl

  • Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.

    Ritse M. Mann;Corinne Balleyguier;Pascal A. Baltzer;Ulrich Bick

  • MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Hybrid PET/MRI Systems: A 4-Class Tissue Segmentation Technique Using a Combined Ultrashort-Echo-Time/Dixon MRI Sequence

    Yannick Berker;Jochen Franke;André Salomon;Moritz Palmowski

  • MRI of breast tumors.

    C. K. Kuhl

  • Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

    Christiane K. Kuhl;Hans H. Schild;Nuschin Morakkabati

  • Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection among Women with Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening

    Christopher E. Comstock;Constantine Gatsonis;Gillian M. Newstead;Bradley S. Snyder

  • Diagnostic Architectural and Dynamic Features at Breast MR

    Mitchell D. Schnall;Jeffrey Blume;David A. Bluemke;Gia A. DeAngelis

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans H. Schild
Hans H. Schild University of Bonn
Felix M. Mottaghy
Felix M. Mottaghy RWTH Aachen University
Constance D. Lehman
Constance D. Lehman Harvard University
Jörg B. Schulz
Jörg B. Schulz RWTH Aachen University
Mitchell D. Schnall
Mitchell D. Schnall University of Pennsylvania
Uwe Klinge
Uwe Klinge RWTH Aachen University
Constantine Gatsonis
Constantine Gatsonis Brown University
Christian Trautwein
Christian Trautwein RWTH Aachen University
Volkmar Schulz
Volkmar Schulz RWTH Aachen University
Fabian Kiessling
Fabian Kiessling RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a medical career in the USA opens doors to not just physicianship, but a variety of healthcare pathways. Many students explore pathways such as nursing, which offer flexible, affordable online education options. For instance, exploring affordable nursing programs can help cut costs while starting a rewarding health career.

For registered nurses seeking to advance, the cheapest rn to bsn online programs allow you to earn your degree without disrupting your job or finances. If you want to move into leadership, research, or academic roles, earning an online phd in nursing can open many doors.

Importantly, for those who already hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, there are direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online that offer a swift path into advanced nursing practice. Each of these routes supports the growing demand for skilled healthcare professionals while offering affordable and flexible study options.

Best Scientists Citing Christiane K. Kuhl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles