World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15767 14829 78 73 475 21364

Thomas H. Helbich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas H. Helbich between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas H. Helbich published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 16 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2023. 43 of the 576 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2023. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 36 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 56 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 17 publications
1990 2025

576 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas H. Helbich: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 11
1996 5
1997 21
1998 11
1999 10
2000 12
2001 12
2002 24
2003 9
2004 12
2005 13
2006 15
2007 12
2008 11
2009 9
2010 19
2011 12
2012 16
2013 14
2014 20
2015 17
2016 18
2017 29
2018 25
2019 36
2020 26
2021 27
2022 23
2023 56
2024 26
2025 17
Total 576
Download as CSV

Thomas H. Helbich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Helbich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 475 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 475
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas H. Helbich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Helbich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas H. Helbich is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Additional subfields include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, and Oncology.

Their research covers a variety of topics, notably MRI in cancer diagnosis, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications. Other key areas include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, and the application of AI in cancer detection.

Frequent publication venues for Thomas H. Helbich include:

  • European Radiology
  • European Journal of Radiology
  • Cancers
  • Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

The scientist often collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Pascal Baltzer
  • Paola Clauser
  • Katja Pinker
  • Panagiotis Kapetas
  • Joachim Friske

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas H. Helbich are:

  • Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), 2022, European Radiology
  • Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging, 2020, Insights into Imaging
  • Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2022, Radiology
  • Supervised machine learning enables non-invasive lesion characterization in primary prostate cancer with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI, 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Diffusion-weighted Imaging Allows for Downgrading MR BI-RADS 4 Lesions in Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast to Avoid Unnecessary Biopsy, 2021, Clinical Cancer Research

Best Publications

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group.

    Francesco Sardanelli;Carla Boetes;Bettina Borisch;Thomas Decker

  • Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.

    Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz;Kristina Lång;Albert Gubern-Merida;Mireille Broeders

  • Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.

    Ritse M. Mann;Corinne Balleyguier;Pascal A. Baltzer;Ulrich Bick

  • Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions : Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates

    R. J. Jackman;F. Burbank;S. H. Parker;W. P. Evans

  • Diffusion-weighted MR for Differentiation of Breast Lesions at 3.0 T: How Does Selection of Diffusion Protocols Affect Diagnosis?

    Wolfgang Bogner;Stephan Gruber;Katja Pinker;Günther Grabner

  • Triple-Modality Screening Trial for Familial Breast Cancer Underlines the Importance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Questions the Role of Mammography and Ultrasound Regardless of Patient Mutation Status, Age, and Breast Density

    Christopher C. Riedl;Nikolaus Luft;Clemens Bernhart;Michael Weber

  • Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results.

    B. Nicolas Bloch;B. Nicolas Bloch;Edna Furman-Haran;Thomas H. Helbich;Robert E. Lenkinski

  • Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability.

    Karen Kinkel;Thomas H. Helbich;Laura J. Esserman;John Barclay

  • Cystic Fibrosis: CT Assessment of Lung Involvement in Children and Adults

    Thomas H. Helbich;Gertraud Heinz-Peer;Irmgard Eichler;Patrick Wunderbaldinger

  • Impact of Machine Learning With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

    Amirhessam Tahmassebi;Georg J Wengert;Thomas H Helbich;Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath

  • US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases.

    Gerd Schueller;Sylvia Jaromi;Lothar Ponhold;Michael Fuchsjaeger

  • Readout-segmented Echo-planar Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-weighted MR Breast Examinations at 3.0 T

    Wolfgang Bogner;Katja Pinker-Domenig;Hubert Bickel;Marek Chmelik

  • Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?

    Oswald Graf;Thomas H. Helbich;Michael H. Fuchsjaeger;Gottfried Hopf

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate marker of tumor response to anti-angiogenic therapy in a xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme.

    Axel Gossmann;Thomas H. Helbich;Nagato Kuriyama;S. Ostrowitzki

  • Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A validation study

    Georg Pfarl;Thomas H Helbich;Christopher C Riedl;Teresa Wagner

  • Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

    Matthew Wallis;Anne Tarvidon;Thomas Helbich;Ingrid Schreer

  • Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey

    Francesco Sardanelli;Hildegunn S. Aase;Marina Álvarez;Edward Azavedo

  • Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study

    Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz;Kristina Lång;Albert Gubern-Merida;Jonas Teuwen

  • Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?

    Oswald Graf;Thomas H. Helbich;Gottfried Hopf;Claudia Graf

  • Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

    Katja Pinker;Wolfgang Bogner;Pascal Baltzer;Stephan Gruber

Frequent Co-Authors

Siegfried Trattnig
Siegfried Trattnig Medical University of Vienna
Elizabeth A. Morris
Elizabeth A. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Timothy P.L. Roberts
Timothy P.L. Roberts Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Fiona J. Gilbert
Fiona J. Gilbert University of Cambridge
Michael Gnant
Michael Gnant Medical University of Vienna
Christoph Thomssen
Christoph Thomssen University of Göttingen
Christiane K. Kuhl
Christiane K. Kuhl RWTH Aachen University
Tanja Fehm
Tanja Fehm Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Richard Pötter
Richard Pötter Medical University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn't just mean becoming a doctor. There are several related online degrees and flexible pathways into healthcare careers. For those interested in quick entry into nursing with a bachelor’s degree in another field, msn direct entry programs online allow you to earn a Master of Science in Nursing even if you aren’t a nurse yet.

If you’re looking for faster or more accessible options, you might research the easiest rn program for straightforward admission processes, or explore an accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid to enter the growing field of medical administration.

For those who prefer the practical side of healthcare, an lpn program without teas test can make becoming a licensed practical nurse more approachable, removing common entrance exam barriers.

These pathways can help you join the healthcare industry quickly, often with the convenience and flexibility of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas H. Helbich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles