World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
34574
World Ranking
11654
National Ranking
628

Bernd Hamm publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Hamm sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,039 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bernd Hamm D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Hamm sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernd Hamm is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany, specializing in the field of Medicine with a focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Their research spans several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, and Rheumatology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to medical imaging and cancer diagnosis. The main areas of research include:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • MRI in Cancer Diagnosis
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Among their recent papers are:

  • ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training, 2020, published in European Radiology
  • The role of visceral adiposity in the severity of COVID-19: Highlights from a unicenter cross-sectional pilot study in Germany, 2020, published in Metabolism
  • Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs, 2020, published in Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin)
  • Introducing the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS): a concept for standardized assessment of lymph nodes in cancer, 2021, published in European Radiology
  • Interactive Explainable Deep Learning Model Informs Prostate Cancer Diagnosis at MRI, 2023, published in Radiology

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Bernd Hamm has coauthored numerous publications with:

  • Marcus R. Makowski
  • Lisa C. Adams
  • Ingolf Sack
  • Stefan M. Niehues
  • Tobias Penzkofer

Their publications are often featured in prominent scientific journals and venues, including:

  • European Radiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Investigative Radiology
  • Cancers
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Best Publications

  • Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

    M. Backhaus;T. Kamradt;D. Sandrock;D. Loreck

  • Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging.

    B Hamm;T Staks;A Mühler;M Bollow

  • Quantitative analyses of sacroiliac biopsies in spondyloarthropathies: T cells and macrophages predominate in early and active sacroiliitis— cellularity correlates with the degree of enhancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging

    M Bollow;T Fischer;H Reisshauer;M Backhaus

  • Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation.

    Marc Dewey;Elke Zimmermann;Florian Deissenrieder;Michael Laule

  • Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology

    Corinne Balleyguier;E. Sala;T. Da Cunha;Antonina Bergman

  • Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints

    M Backhaus;G R Burmester;D Sandrock;D Loreck

  • A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis

    Alexander K. Scheel;Kay-Geert A. Hermann;Elke Kahler;Daniel Pasewaldt

  • MR Imaging–guided Prostate Biopsy with a Closed MR Unit at 1.5 T: Initial Results

    Dirk Beyersdorff;Axel Winkel;Bernd Hamm;Severin Lenk

  • Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography.

    Patrick Asbach;Dieter Klatt;Uwe Hamhaber;Jürgen Braun

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques using superparamagnetic iron oxide particles

    Stephan A. Schmitz;Matthias Taupitz;Susanne Wagner;Karl‐Jürgen Wolf

  • Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography.

    Patrick Asbach;Dieter Klatt;Beate Schlosser;Michael Biermer

  • Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of liver and spleen: first experience in humans with a new superparamagnetic iron oxide

    Bernd Hamm;Thomas Staks;Matthias Taupitz;Renate Maibauer

  • Early sacroiliitis in patients with spondyloarthropathy: evaluation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging

    M Bollow;J Braun;B Hamm;U Eggens

  • ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training

    Maarten de Rooij;Bas Israël;Marcia Tummers;Hashim U. Ahmed;Hashim U. Ahmed

  • Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints

    Alexander K. Scheel;Kay-Geert A. Hermann;Sarah Ohrndorf;Carola Werner

  • Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: Value of MR imaging

    Dirk Beyersdorff;Matthias Taupitz;Bjoern Winkelmann;Thomas Fischer

  • Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging--a multicenter phase III clinical study.

    J Petersein;A Spinazzi;A Giovagnoni;P Soyer

  • Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.

    Johannes Greupner;Elke Zimmermann;Andrea Grohmann;Hans-Peter Dübel

  • Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding--multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning.

    Tobias Franiel;Carsten Stephan;Andreas Erbersdobler;Ekkehart Dietz

  • Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions.

    Ahmed-Emad Mahfouz;B. Hamm;K.-J. Wolf

Frequent Co-Authors

Jürgen Braun
Jürgen Braun Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
René M. Botnar
René M. Botnar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Joachim Sieper
Joachim Sieper Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Uwe Karst
Uwe Karst University of Münster
Peter Wust
Peter Wust Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Klemens Budde
Klemens Budde Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Peter Neuhaus
Peter Neuhaus Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and related healthcare degrees can open up a range of career opportunities in the medical field. For registered nurses looking to expand their qualifications, rn to bsn online programs are a flexible and cost-effective way to advance your education while continuing to work.

If you have a non-nursing background but wish to transition into nursing, consider msn direct entry programs online. These programs allow students with a bachelor’s degree in another field to earn a Master of Science in Nursing without starting from scratch.

For individuals who are new to nursing, online bsn programs for non nurses offer an accessible pathway into the profession. Many of these programs are designed to be learner-friendly and cater to a diverse student population.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are several medical billing and coding schools online that offer accredited programs, often with financial aid options available. This career path is ideal for those who prefer a non-clinical but essential role in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Bernd Hamm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles