World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip G. Conaghan

Philip G. Conaghan

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
124
Citations
60651
World Ranking
3210
National Ranking
321

Philip G. Conaghan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip G. Conaghan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 824 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip G. Conaghan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip G. Conaghan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip G. Conaghan is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specialized concentration in Rheumatology, supported by significant work in Surgery, Pharmacology, Hematology, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

The main topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

Philip G. Conaghan has published extensively in several key journals within their field. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (59 publications)
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (42 publications)
  • Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (23 publications)
  • Lara D. Veeken (20 publications)
  • The Lancet Rheumatology (8 publications)

Their most recent papers highlight diverse contributions to rheumatology and related topics. Selected recent works include:

  • "European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Executive summary," 2021, Resuscitation
  • "Osteoarthritis year in review 2021: epidemiology & therapy," 2021, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • "European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation," 2021, Resuscitation
  • "EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: 2023 update," 2024, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • "Effects of Interleukin-1β Inhibition on Incident Hip and Knee Replacement," 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine

Frequent collaborators in Philip G. Conaghan's research include:

  • Sarah R. Kingsbury
  • Asger Reinstrup Bihlet
  • Lee S. Simon
  • E. Hensor
  • Alan Brett

Best Publications

  • EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee For International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)

    W Zhang;M Doherty;T Bardin;E Pascual

  • EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis

    Linda Fernandes;Kåre B Hagen;Johannes W J Bijlsma;Oyvor Andreassen

  • Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology

    Richard J Wakefield;Peter V Balint;Marcin Szkudlarek;Emilio Filippucci

  • The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?

    Alan Tennant;Philip G. Conaghan

  • The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography.

    Richard J. Wakefield;Wayne W. Gibbon;Philip G. Conaghan;Philip O'Connor

  • Secukinumab, a human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2) : a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Iain B McInnes;Philip J Mease;Bruce Kirkham;Arthur Kavanaugh

  • An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis

    A. K. Brown;P. G. Conaghan;Z. Karim;M. A. Quinn

  • Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score)

    David J Hunter;Ali Guermazi;Grace H Lo;Grace H Lo;Andrew J Grainger

  • Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression.

    A. K. Brown;M. A. Quinn;Z. Karim;P. G. Conaghan

  • OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system.

    Mikkel Østergaard;Charles Peterfy;Philip Conaghan;Fiona McQueen

  • Synovitis in osteoarthritis: current understanding with therapeutic implications.

    Alexander Mathiessen;Philip G. Conaghan;Philip G. Conaghan

  • Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0

    Maarten Boers;John R. Kirwan;George Wells;Dorcas Beaton

  • EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis

    Alexandra N. Colebatch;Christopher John Edwards;Mikkel Østergaard;Désirée Van Der Heijde

  • Very early treatment with infliximab in addition to methotrexate in early, poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis reduces magnetic resonance imaging evidence of synovitis and damage, with sustained benefit after infliximab withdrawal: Results from a twelve-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Mark A. Quinn;Philip G. Conaghan;Philip J. O'Connor;Zunaid Karim

  • EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice

    P Mandl;V Navarro-Compán;L Terslev;P Aegerter

  • Synovitis detected on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to pain and cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis

    Catherine L Hill;David J Hunter;Jingbo Niu;Margaret Clancy

  • The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score)

    David J Hunter;Grace H Lo;Daniel Gale;Andrew J Grainger

  • Topical NSAIDS for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults

    Sheena Derry;Philip Conaghan;José António P Da Silva;Philip J Wiffen

  • Effect of tight control of inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): a UK multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

    Laura C Coates;Anna R Moverley;Lucy McParland;Sarah Brown

  • Paracetamol: not as safe as we thought? A systematic literature review of observational studies

    Emmert Roberts;Vanessa Delgado Nunes;Sara Buckner;Susan Latchem

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Emery
Paul Emery University of Leeds
Mikkel Østergaard
Mikkel Østergaard University of Copenhagen
Richard J. Wakefield
Richard J. Wakefield University of Leeds
Charles Peterfy
Charles Peterfy University of California, San Francisco
Dennis McGonagle
Dennis McGonagle University of Leeds
Harry K. Genant
Harry K. Genant University of California, San Francisco
Vibeke Strand
Vibeke Strand Stanford University
Philip J. Mease
Philip J. Mease University of Washington
Philip S. Helliwell
Philip S. Helliwell University of Leeds
Désirée van der Heijde
Désirée van der Heijde Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can expand your career options in medicine or allied health fields. For registered nurses aiming to advance, several dnp programs online offer a flexible way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice, enabling leadership or specialist roles with high earning potential.

For those seeking a quicker path and less clinical commitment, you may consider an dnp program without clinical hours. These programs emphasize non-clinical skills such as administration, education, or informatics—perfect for those interested in healthcare strategy over bedside care.

If you are just starting your nursing journey, a lpn program provides an accelerated entry into nursing practice. Licensed Practical Nursing can be a stepping stone to more advanced healthcare careers.

Specialized roles like nurse practitioner in mental health are also available online. For nurses passionate about psychiatry, psychiatric np programs offer focused training for high-demand, rewarding positions.

These online programs are ideal for working professionals, career changers, or anyone seeking a flexible pathway in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Philip G. Conaghan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles