World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mikkel Østergaard

Mikkel Østergaard

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
43990
World Ranking
5571
National Ranking
60

Mikkel Østergaard publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikkel Østergaard sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 880 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mikkel Østergaard D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikkel Østergaard sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mikkel Østergaard is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and has produced extensive research in the field of medicine, with a strong focus on rheumatology. Their work spans several subfields including immunology, orthopedics and sports medicine, hematology, and pathology and forensic medicine.

Their research topics cover a range of areas connected to autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, with significant contributions to studies on spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Additional focus areas include psoriasis treatment and pathogenesis, bone and joint diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus research, and spine and intervertebral disc pathology.

Frequent publication venues for their research are diverse and include:

  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Lara D. Veeken
  • RMD Open
  • The Journal of Rheumatology
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy

Mikkel Østergaard has coauthored numerous papers with several researchers who frequently collaborate on related medical topics. These coauthors include Merete Lund Hetland, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Björn Guðbjörnsson, Walter P. Maksymowych, and Susanne Juhl Pedersen.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Active conventional treatment and three different biological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis: phase IV investigator initiated, randomised, observer blinded clinical trial (2020, BMJ)
  • Abatacept inhibits inflammation and onset of rheumatoid arthritis in individuals at high risk (ARIAA): a randomised, international, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2024, The Lancet)
  • Data-driven definitions for active and structural MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joint in spondyloarthritis and their predictive utility (2021, Lara D. Veeken)
  • MRI lesions of the spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: an update of lesion definitions and validation by the ASAS MRI working group (2022, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases)
  • Drug retention, inactive disease and response rates in 1860 patients with axial spondyloarthritis initiating secukinumab treatment: routine care data from 13 registries in the EuroSpA collaboration (2020, RMD Open)

Best Publications

  • Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force

    Josef S Smolen;Ferdinand C Breedveld;Gerd R Burmester;Vivian Bykerk

  • Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology

    Richard J Wakefield;Peter V Balint;Marcin Szkudlarek;Emilio Filippucci

  • Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group

    M. Rudwaleit;A. G. Jurik;K.-G. A. Hermann;R. Landewé

  • OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system.

    Mikkel Østergaard;Charles Peterfy;Philip Conaghan;Fiona McQueen

  • EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis

    Alexandra N. Colebatch;Christopher John Edwards;Mikkel Østergaard;Désirée Van Der Heijde

  • Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis

    Marcin Szkudlarek;Michel Court-Payen;Søren Jacobsen;Mette Klarlund

  • Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry.

    Merete Lund Hetland;Ib Jarle Christensen;Ulrik Tarp;Lene Dreyer

  • Multinational evidence-based recommendations for the use of methotrexate in rheumatic disorders with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis: integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of a broad international panel of rheumatologists in the 3E Initiative

    K Visser;W Katchamart;E Loza;J A Martinez-Lopez

  • EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice

    P Mandl;V Navarro-Compán;L Terslev;P Aegerter

  • Power doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

    Marcin Szkudlarek;Michel Court‐Payen;Charlotte Strandberg;Mette Klarlund

  • Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination.

    Marcin Szkudlarek;Eva Narvestad;Mette Klarlund;Michel Court-Payen

  • Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group

    Robert G W Lambert;Pauline A C Bakker;Désirée van der Heijde;Ulrich Weber

  • MRI bone oedema is the strongest predictor of subsequent radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a 2-year randomised controlled trial (CIMESTRA)

    M L Hetland;B Ejbjerg;K Hørslev-Petersen;S Jacobsen

  • Inflammatory lesions of the spine on magnetic resonance imaging predict the development of new syndesmophytes in ankylosing spondylitis: Evidence of a relationship between inflammation and new bone formation

    Walter P. Maksymowych;Praveena Chiowchanwisawakit;Praveena Chiowchanwisawakit;Tracey Clare;Susanne J. Pedersen

  • Magnetic resonance imaging–determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Mikkel Østergaard;Michael Hansen;Michael Stoltenberg;Peter Gideon

  • An introduction to the EULAR–OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas

    M Østergaard;J Edmonds;F McQueen;C Peterfy

  • Magnetic resonance imaging findings in 84 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: bone marrow oedema predicts erosive progression

    Espen A Haavardsholm;Pernille Bøyesen;Mikkel Østergaard;Arnulf Schildvold

  • Risankizumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, for ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, dose-finding phase 2 study.

    Dominique Baeten;Mikkel Østergaard;James Cheng-Chung Wei;Joachim Sieper

  • Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination

    Marcin Szkudlarek;Mette Klarlund;Eva Narvestad;Michel Court-Payen

  • The diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in spondylarthritis: an international multicenter evaluation of one hundred eighty-seven subjects.

    Ulrich Weber;Robert G. W. Lambert;Mikkel Østergaard;Juerg Hodler

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip G. Conaghan
Philip G. Conaghan University of Leeds
Paul Emery
Paul Emery University of Leeds
Walter P. Maksymowych
Walter P. Maksymowych University of Alberta
Charles Peterfy
Charles Peterfy University of California, San Francisco
Søren Jacobsen
Søren Jacobsen Copenhagen University Hospital
Bent Deleuran
Bent Deleuran Aarhus University Hospital
Tore K. Kvien
Tore K. Kvien University of Oslo
Harry K. Genant
Harry K. Genant University of California, San Francisco
Henning Bliddal
Henning Bliddal Copenhagen University Hospital
Robin Christensen
Robin Christensen University of Southern Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options beyond traditional medical degrees can open new career doors in the healthcare field. Online programs offer flexible ways to advance your education while balancing work and personal commitments. For example, if you are passionate about mental health, consider accelerated msn psychiatric np programs, which allow you to quickly specialize and serve patients in high-demand areas.

Healthcare doesn’t just need doctors—there’s a strong demand for leaders and administrators. With online healthcare administration programs, you can build essential business and management skills for a variety of leadership roles. If cost is a concern, cheapest mha online programs make earning an advanced degree more accessible.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest clinical practice level, options like cheapest bsn to dnp programs offer affordable and reputable pathways. With so many online and distance learning opportunities available, finding a degree that matches your interests and budget has never been easier.

Best Scientists Citing Mikkel Østergaard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles