World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
19418
World Ranking
15319
National Ranking
594

Amalia Mattiello publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amalia Mattiello sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 316 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Amalia Mattiello D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amalia Mattiello sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amalia Mattiello is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, with a total of 25 publications in medicine and 8 in molecular biology-related fields.

Their work encompasses several subfields including cancer research, reproductive medicine, epidemiology, physiology, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism. This multifaceted approach is reflected in the topics covered in their research, which include ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment, nutritional studies and diet, cancer, lipids, and metabolism, diet and metabolism studies, adipokines, inflammation, and metabolic diseases, cancer-related molecular mechanisms, and genetic associations and epidemiology.

Amalia Mattiello has contributed to various academic journals, frequently publishing in:

  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • International Journal of Cancer
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • BMC Medicine

Their recent publications include:

  • Serologic markers of Chlamydia trachomatis and other sexually transmitted infections and subsequent ovarian cancer risk: Results from the EPIC cohort, 2020, International Journal of Cancer
  • Prospective analysis of circulating metabolites and endometrial cancer risk, 2021, Gynecologic Oncology
  • Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of coronary heart disease: a pan-European cohort study, 2020, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Dietary and Circulating Fatty Acids and Ovarian Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, including Elisabete Weiderpass, Rosario Tumino, Renée T. Fortner, Marc J. Gunter, and Anne Tjønneland. These collaborations have contributed to advancing research in the intersecting areas of cancer epidemiology and metabolic studies.

Best Publications

  • Differences in the prospective association between individual plasma phospholipid saturated fatty acids and incident type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study.

    Nita G. Forouhi;Albert Koulman;Stephen J. Sharp;Fumiaki Imamura

  • Physical Activity and Mortality in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Study and Meta-analysis.

    Diewertje Sluik;Brian Buijsse;Rebecca Muckelbauer;Rudolf Kaaks

  • Reproductive risk factors and endometrial cancer: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.

    Laure Dossus;Naomi Allen;Rudolf Kaaks;Kjersti Bakken

  • Urokinase-mediated posttranscriptional regulation of urokinase-receptor expression in non small cell lung carcinoma.

    Nunzia Montuori;Amalia Mattiello;Alessandro Mancini;Paola Taglialatela

  • Plasma adiponectin levels and endometrial cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women.

    Anne E. Cust;Anne E. Cust;Anne E. Cust;Rudolf Kaaks;Christine Friedenreich;Fabrice Bonnet;Fabrice Bonnet

  • Mediterranean dietary patterns and prospective weight change in participants of the EPIC-PANACEA project

    Dora Romaguera;Teresa Norat;Anne Claire Vergnaud;Traci Mouw

  • Long-term risk of incident type 2 diabetes and measures of overall and regional obesity: the EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study.

    Claudia Langenberg;Stephen J. Sharp;Matthias B. Schulze;Olov Rolandsson

  • The Influence of Hormonal Factors on the Risk of Developing Cervical Cancer and Pre-Cancer: Results from the EPIC Cohort

    Esther Roura;Noémie Travier;Tim Waterboer;Silvia de Sanjosé

  • Physical Activity and Ovarian Cancer Risk: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

    Petra H. Lahmann;Christine Friedenreich;A. Jantine Schuit;Simonetta Salvini

  • Design and cohort description of the InterAct Project: an examination of the interaction of genetic and lifestyle factors on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the EPIC Study

    C. Langenberg;S. Sharp;N. G. Forouhi;Paul Franks

  • A Priori-Defined Dietary Patterns Are Associated with Reduced Risk of Stroke in a Large Italian Cohort

    Claudia Agnoli;Vittorio Krogh;Sara Grioni;Sabina Sieri

  • Yogurt consumption and risk of colorectal cancer in the Italian European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort

    Valeria Pala;Sabina Sieri;Franco Berrino;Paolo Vineis;Paolo Vineis

  • Active and passive cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk: Results from the EPIC cohort

    Laure Dossus;Laure Dossus;Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault;Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault;Rudolf Kaaks;Inger T. Gram

  • Anthropometric factors and risk of endometrial cancer: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition

    Christine Friedenreich;Anne Cust;Anne Cust;Anne Cust;Petra H. Lahmann;Karen Steindorf

  • Fruit, vegetables, and olive oil and risk of coronary heart disease in Italian women: the EPICOR Study

    Benedetta Bendinelli;Giovanna Masala;Calogero Saieva;Simonetta Salvini

  • Physical activity and gain in abdominal adiposity and body weight: prospective cohort study in 288,498 men and women

    Ulf Ekelund;Herve Besson;Jian'an Luan;Anne M. May

  • Age at Menarche and Type 2 Diabetes Risk: The EPIC-InterAct study

    Cathy E. Elks;Ken K. Ong;Robert A. Scott;Yvonne T. van der Schouw

  • Dietary Glycemic Load and Index and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in a Large Italian Cohort: The EPICOR Study

    Sabina Sieri;Vittorio Krogh;Franco Berrino;Alberto Evangelista

  • Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma: a reanalysis of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-EURGAST) study after a longer follow-up.

    Carlos A. Gonzalez;Leila Lujan-Barroso;H. B. Bueno-De-Mesquita;Mazda Jenab

  • Prediagnostic body fat and risk of death from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: The EPIC cohort

    Valentina Gallo;Petra A. Wark;Mazda Jenab;Neil Pearce

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosario Tumino
Rosario Tumino Provincial Health Authority of Syracuse
Petra H.M. Peeters
Petra H.M. Peeters Utrecht University
Kim Overvad
Kim Overvad Aarhus University
Anne Tjønneland
Anne Tjønneland University of Copenhagen
Elio Riboli
Elio Riboli Imperial College London
Heiner Boeing
Heiner Boeing German Institute of Human Nutrition
Antonia Trichopoulou
Antonia Trichopoulou National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault University of Paris-Saclay
Rudolf Kaaks
Rudolf Kaaks German Cancer Research Center
Kay-Tee Khaw
Kay-Tee Khaw University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a career in medicine or nursing in the USA, various online programs can help you reach your goals faster. Many students are interested in the fastest online dnp programs to advance their careers while balancing work and family commitments. These programs typically offer flexible coursework and accelerated study options.

If you’re aiming for a doctoral level in nursing quickly, you may want to consider a 1 year dnp program online. These intensive programs are designed for highly motivated professionals looking to move ahead in a short timeframe.

Those starting their nursing journey might explore accelerated lpn courses. These fast-track options enable students to enter the workforce in as little time as possible while still gaining essential skills.

Additionally, mental health professionals are in high demand. You can specialize with psych np programs that provide focused online training to become a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.

Online pathways offer flexible, accelerated opportunities for both new students and experienced clinicians looking to grow in the health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Amalia Mattiello

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles