World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7707 7405 2747 2555 113 6549

Joseph M. Wheaton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joseph M. Wheaton between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joseph M. Wheaton published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2015. 4 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2015. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
2001 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joseph M. Wheaton: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 7
2005 1
2006 4
2007 5
2008 4
2009 3
2010 1
2011 7
2012 8
2013 8
2014 6
2015 13
2016 13
2017 8
2018 5
2019 4
2020 6
2021 2
2022 2
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
Total 117
Download as CSV

Joseph M. Wheaton publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Wheaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 113 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 113
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Joseph M. Wheaton D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Wheaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Joseph M. Wheaton is affiliated with Utah State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Ecology, Water Science and Technology, Soil Science, Plant Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scholar's work addresses multiple topics within these areas, particularly Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport, Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, as well as Flood Risk Assessment and Management.

Joseph M. Wheaton has published papers in various scientific venues, with frequent contributions to Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, Water, The Science of The Total Environment, and Anthropocene.

Recent publications include:

  • "Let the river erode! Enabling lateral migration increases geomorphic unit diversity" (2020) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Riverscapes as natural infrastructure: Meeting challenges of climate adaptation and ecosystem restoration" (2022) in Anthropocene
  • "Hydropeaked rivers need attention" (2020) in Environmental Research Letters
  • "Modelling Eurasian beaver foraging habitat and dam suitability, for predicting the location and number of dams throughout catchments in Great Britain" (2020) in European Journal of Wildlife Research
  • "Geomorphic process signatures reshaping sub-humid Mediterranean badlands: 2. Application to 5-year dataset" (2020) in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Frequent collaborators in their research include William W. Macfarlane, Jordan Gilbert, Manel Llena, Damià Vericat, and Emily Fairfax.

Best Publications

  • Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets

    Joseph M. Wheaton;James Brasington;Stephen E. Darby;David A. Sear

  • Using Beaver Dams to Restore Incised Stream Ecosystems

    Michael M. Pollock;Timothy J. Beechie;Joseph M. Wheaton;Chris E. Jordan

  • Analyzing High Resolution Topography for Advancing the Understanding of Mass and Energy Transfer Through Landscapes: A Review

    Paola Passalacqua;Patrick Belmont;Dennis M. Staley;Jeffrey D. Simley

  • Ecosystem experiment reveals benefits of natural and simulated beaver dams to a threatened population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

    Nicolaas Bouwes;Nicholas Weber;Chris E. Jordan;W. Carl Saunders

  • Geomorphic mapping and taxonomy of fluvial landforms

    Joseph M. Wheaton;Kirstie A. Fryirs;Gary Brierley;Sara G. Bangen

  • Flow convergence routing hypothesis for pool-riffle maintenance in alluvial rivers

    Michael L. MacWilliams;Joseph M. Wheaton;Joseph M. Wheaton;Gregory B. Pasternack;Robert L. Street

  • Morphodynamic signatures of braiding mechanisms as expressed through change in sediment storage in a gravel-bed river

    Joseph M. Wheaton;James Brasington;Stephen E. Darby;Alan Kasprak

  • Spawning habitat rehabilitation ‐I. Conceptual approach and methods

    Joseph M. Wheaton;Gregory B. Pasternack;Joseph E. Merz

  • Linking geomorphic changes to salmonid habitat at a scale relevant to fish

    Joseph M. Wheaton;James Brasington;Stephen E. Darby;Joseph E. Merz

  • An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes

    Kirstie A. Fryirs;Joseph M. Wheaton;Gary J. Brierley

  • A methodological intercomparison of topographic survey techniques for characterizing wadeable streams and rivers

    Sara G. Bangen;Joseph M. Wheaton;Nicolaas Bouwes;Boyd Bouwes

  • Modeling the capacity of riverscapes to support beaver dams

    William W. Macfarlane;Joseph M. Wheaton;Nicolaas Bouwes;Martha L. Jensen

  • Alteration of stream temperature by natural and artificial beaver dams.

    Nicholas Weber;Nicolaas Bouwes;Michael M. Pollock;Carol Volk

  • Predicting benefits of spawning-habitat rehabilitation to salmonid (Oncorhynchus spp.) fry production in a regulated California river

    Joseph E Merz;Jose D Setka;Gregory B Pasternack;Joseph M Wheaton

  • Impacts of beaver dams on hydrologic and temperature regimes in a mountain stream

    M. Majerova;B. T. Neilson;N. M. Schmadel;J. M. Wheaton

  • Accuracy assessment of aerial photographs acquired using lighter-than-air blimps: low-cost tools for mapping river corridors

    Damia Vericat;James Brasington;Joseph M. Wheaton;Michaela Cowie

  • Spawning habitat rehabilitation ‐ II. Using hypothesis development and testing in design, Mokelumne river, California, U.S.A.

    Joseph M. Wheaton;Gregory B. Pasternack;Joseph E. Merz

  • Revisiting the Morphological Approach

    Damià Vericat;Joseph M. Wheaton;James Brasington

  • Error propagation for velocity and shear stress prediction using 2D models for environmental management.

    Gregory B. Pasternack;Andrew T. Gilbert;Joseph M. Wheaton;Joseph M. Wheaton;Evan M. Buckland

  • Sediment budget for salmonid spawning habitat rehabilitation in a regulated river

    Joseph E. Merz;Joseph E. Merz;Gregory B. Pasternack;Joseph M. Wheaton

  • The relationship between particle travel distance and channel morphology: Results from physical models of braided rivers

    Alan Kasprak;Joseph M. Wheaton;Peter E. Ashmore;James W. Hensleigh

Frequent Co-Authors

James Brasington
James Brasington University of Canterbury
Damià Vericat
Damià Vericat University of Lleida
Gregory B. Pasternack
Gregory B. Pasternack University of California, Davis
David Sear
David Sear University of Southampton
Kirstie Fryirs
Kirstie Fryirs Macquarie University
Stephen E. Darby
Stephen E. Darby University of Southampton
Gary Brierley
Gary Brierley University of Auckland
Ramon J. Batalla
Ramon J. Batalla University of Lleida
John C. Schmidt
John C. Schmidt Utah State University
Patrick Belmont
Patrick Belmont Utah State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens diverse opportunities, often complemented by related fields such as sociology, education, and social work. Many students explore interdisciplinary options to enhance their expertise and career prospects.

For those interested in understanding human-environment interactions, pursuing an online bachelors in sociology provides strong insight into societal behaviors and environmental impact, which is crucial for policy and community-based projects.

Education professionals looking to advance without lengthy research commitments may consider an edd without dissertation. This path enables practical leadership development, ideal for environmental educators aiming to influence curriculum or program management.

Transitioning from an eds to edd program is a viable option for environmental science educators who desire a higher level of academic credentialing and leadership skills, deepening their impact within educational institutions.

For those focused on social dimensions of environmental work, online online dsw programs offer advanced training in leadership, policy, and intervention strategies, supporting careers in community development and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph M. Wheaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles