World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 57 14100 12966 1104 1026 124 8385

Keith T. Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith T. Jones between 1988 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith T. Jones published across 36 years, from 1988 to 2023, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2010. 2 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2010. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications
1988 2023

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith T. Jones: publications per year, 1988 to 2023
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 6
1995 3
1996 3
1997 3
1998 5
1999 3
2000 6
2001 3
2002 3
2003 3
2004 6
2005 6
2006 5
2007 7
2008 6
2009 5
2010 10
2011 8
2012 10
2013 10
2014 4
2015 1
2016 6
2017 3
2018 8
2019 0
2020 1
2021 2
2022 0
2023 2
Total 141
Download as CSV

Keith T. Jones publications per year - data summary

  • Keith T. Jones, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Sussex, has 141 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1988 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive years are 2010, 2012 and 2013, with 10 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988, 2015 and 2020, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 36 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989, 1990, 1991, 1992 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.7 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 5 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-1999: 26 publications (2.2 per year); 2000-2011: 68 publications (5.7 per year); 2012-2023: 47 publications (3.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Keith T. Jones publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith T. Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 124 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848 124
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith T. Jones publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Keith T. Jones, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Sussex, records 124 publications - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Keith T. Jones, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Keith T. Jones ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Keith T. Jones D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith T. Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235 57
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Keith T. Jones D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Keith T. Jones, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Sussex, records 57 D-Index - the 31st percentile of the discipline.
  • 31% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Keith T. Jones, and about 69% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Keith T. Jones ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Keith T. Jones is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within health and molecular biology, focusing on topics related to health professions and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The main subfields represented in their work include general health professions, molecular biology, philosophy, cell biology, and plant science.

Jones's research covers various topics including hermeneutics and narrative identity, aging, elder care and social issues, health, medicine and society, extracellular vesicles in disease, microtubule and mitosis dynamics, genomics and chromatin dynamics, and chromosomal and genetic variations.

Their published papers include the following:

  • Loss of centromeric RNA activates the spindle assembly checkpoint in mammalian female meiosis I, 2021, The Journal of Cell Biology
  • Abstract MP219: Hnrnpa2b1-dependent Selective Sorting Of Mir-486a-5p Into Msc-derived Exosomes Contributes To Cardioprotection, 2021, Circulation Research
  • ((+27782822888_//??((@))_info HIPS AND BUMS ENLARGEMENT PILLS AND CREAMS IN SOWETO, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Muscat-[+256778944951_"@"]-abortion-pills-for-sale-in-sohar OMAN, MUSCAT, SALALAH, SEEB, SOHAR, NIZWA, KHASAB, SUR, BAHLA, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Dr KIKUBO ((((+256778944951_/////)))) In KUWAIT Abortion Cytotec, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Jones frequently collaborates with several researchers. The notable co-authors include:

  • Chongyu Zhang
  • Srdjan Nikolovski
  • Bülent Kantarcıoğlu
  • Fakiha Siddiqui
  • Jawed Fareed

The main publication venues for Jones's work are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Circulation Research
  • The Journal of Cell Biology
  • Circulation

Best Publications

  • Reactive Oxygen Species and Sperm Function—In Sickness and In Health

    R John Aitken;Keith T Jones;Sarah A Robertson

  • Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age

    Keith T. Jones

  • Turning it on and off: M-phase promoting factor during meiotic maturation and fertilization.

    Keith T. Jones

  • Meiotic and mitotic Ca2+ oscillations affect cell composition in resulting blastocysts.

    Adriana Bos-Mikich;David G. Whittingham;Keith T. Jones

  • Ionomycin, thapsigargin, ryanodine, and sperm induced Ca2+ release increase during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes

    Keith T. Jones;John Carroll;David G. Whittingham

  • Repetitive sperm-induced Ca2+ transients in mouse oocytes are cell cycle dependent.

    Keith T. Jones;John Carroll;Julie A. Merriman;David G. Whittingham

  • Molecular causes of aneuploidy in mammalian eggs.

    Keith T. Jones;Simon I. R. Lane

  • Mouse Emi2 is required to enter meiosis II by reestablishing cyclin B1 during interkinesis

    Suzanne Madgwick;David V. Hansen;Mark Levasseur;Peter K. Jackson

  • APCcdh1 activity in mouse oocytes prevents entry into the first meiotic division.

    Alexandra Reis;Heng Yu Chang;Mark Levasseur;Keith T. Jones

  • Melatonin Prevents Postovulatory Oocyte Aging in the Mouse and Extends the Window for Optimal Fertilization In Vitro

    Tessa Lord;Brett Nixon;Keith T. Jones;R. John Aitken

  • Mammalian egg activation: from Ca2+ spiking to cell cycle progression

    Keith T Jones

  • How eggs arrest at metaphase II: MPF stabilisation plus APC/C inhibition equals Cytostatic Factor

    Suzanne Madgwick;Keith T Jones

  • Ca2+ Oscillations Promote APC/C-Dependent Cyclin B1 Degradation during Metaphase Arrest and Completion of Meiosis in Fertilizing Mouse Eggs

    Victoria L. Nixon;Mark Levasseur;Alex McDougall;Keith T. Jones

  • Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension

    Simon I. R. Lane;Yan Yun;Keith T. Jones

  • Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, and not protein kinase C, is sufficient for triggering cell-cycle resumption in mammalian eggs.

    Suzanne Madgwick;Mark Levasseur;Keith T. Jones

  • Ca2+ oscillations in the activation of the egg and development of the embryo in mammals.

    Keith T. Jones

  • Prometaphase APCcdh1 activity prevents non-disjunction in mammalian oocytes.

    Alexandra Reis;Suzanne Madgwick;Heng Yu Chang;Ibtissem Nabti

  • The passage of Ca2+ and fluorescent markers between the sperm and egg after fusion in the mouse

    Keith T. Jones;Christian Soeller;Mark B. Cannell

  • A mammalian sperm cytosolic phospholipase C activity generates inositol trisphosphate and causes Ca2+ release in sea urchin egg homogenates

    Keith T Jones;Caroline Cruttwell;John Parrington;Karl Swann

  • Mammalian Sperm Contain a Ca2+-Sensitive Phospholipase C Activity That Can Generate InsP3 from PIP2 Associated with Intracellular Organelles

    Anne Rice;John Parrington;Keith T Jones;Karl Swann

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl Swann
Karl Swann Cardiff University
John Parrington
John Parrington University of Oxford
Eileen A. McLaughlin
Eileen A. McLaughlin University of Wollongong
Sergio Moreno
Sergio Moreno University of Salamanca
John L. Carroll
John L. Carroll University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Moira K O'Bryan
Moira K O'Bryan University of Melbourne
David J. Elliott
David J. Elliott Newcastle University
Michael C. Carroll
Michael C. Carroll Boston Children's Hospital
Tomohiro Kono
Tomohiro Kono Tokyo University of Agriculture
Peter Koopman
Peter Koopman University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to various rewarding careers, both in research and applied healthcare settings. Many students seek flexible options to further their studies or shift into specialized roles, making online degrees increasingly popular.

For those with a nursing background, the rn to bsn pathway offers an accessible way to advance clinical skills and qualify for more advanced positions. If you're interested in management roles within healthcare, an accelerated healthcare management degree online can fast-track your leadership ambitions.

Some biology and biochemistry graduates also transition into mental health care, utilizing their science background to pursue opportunities like psychiatric np programs, which are accessible online and cater to the increasing need for mental health professionals.

Nutrition is another growing field closely linked to biochemistry. Those interested can consider a fast track nutrition degree online to quickly enter or advance in dietetics and public health roles. Online study options make it easier to balance professional development with current work or personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Keith T. Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles