World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 59 12725 11712 141 140 406 10631

Nam-Hyung Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nam-Hyung Kim between 1995 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nam-Hyung Kim published across 30 years, from 1995 to 2024, averaging 14.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2016. 13 of the 429 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2016. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 43 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications
1995 2024

429 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nam-Hyung Kim: publications per year, 1995 to 2024
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 9
1997 6
1998 5
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 4
2003 11
2004 13
2005 12
2006 17
2007 18
2008 10
2009 10
2010 15
2011 20
2012 29
2013 27
2014 41
2015 32
2016 43
2017 36
2018 15
2019 13
2020 11
2021 8
2022 2
2023 7
2024 6
Total 429
Download as CSV

Nam-Hyung Kim publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nam-Hyung Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 397–406 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 406 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145 406
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Nam-Hyung Kim D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nam-Hyung Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253 59
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nam-Hyung Kim is affiliated with Chungbuk National University in South Korea. Their research primarily focuses on reproductive biology, with a significant emphasis on embryonic development and reproductive medicine. The scientist has contributed extensively to related fields such as medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The research topics that Nam-Hyung Kim has engaged in include:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Phytoestrogen effects and research

Their subfields of study include:

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Molecular Biology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Cell Biology

Nam-Hyung Kim has published papers in various journals, with frequent publications appearing in the following venues:

  • Theriogenology
  • Animals
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Veterinary Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Some notable recent papers authored by Nam-Hyung Kim include:

  • Leonurine improves in vitro porcine embryo development competence by reducing reactive oxygen species production and protecting mitochondrial function, 2020, Theriogenology
  • Schisanhenol improves early porcine embryo development by regulating the phosphorylation level of MAPK, 2021, Theriogenology
  • Carnosic acid improves porcine early embryonic development by inhibiting the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, 2020, Journal of Reproduction and Development
  • Melatonin alleviates defects induced by zearalenone during porcine embryo development, 2020, Theriogenology
  • Xanthoangelol promotes early embryonic development of porcine embryos by relieving endoplasmic reticulum stress and enhancing mitochondrial function, 2023, Reproductive BioMedicine Online

The scientist regularly collaborates in research with several co-authors, including:

  • Hao Jiang
  • Bao Yuan
  • Jiabao Zhang
  • Chengzhen Chen
  • Xuerui Yao

Best Publications

  • Arp2/3 complex regulates asymmetric division and cytokinesis in mouse oocytes.

    Shao-Chen Sun;Zhen-Bo Wang;Yong-Nan Xu;Seung-Eun Lee

  • Microtubule and microfilament dynamics in porcine oocytes during meiotic maturation.

    Nam Hyung Kim;Hiroaki Funahashi;Randall S. Prather;Gerald Schatten

  • Microtubule organization in porcine oocytes during fertilization and parthenogenesis.

    Nam Hyung Kim;Calvin Simerly;Hiroaki Funahashi;Gerald Schatten

  • Cytoskeletal alteration in aged porcine oocytes and parthenogenesis.

    Nam-Hyung Kim;Seung Ju Moon;Randall S. Prather;Billy N. Day

  • EFFECTS OF OVIDUCTAL FLUID ON SPERM PENETRATION AND CORTICAL GRANULE EXOCYTOSIS DURING FERTILIZATION OF PIG OOCYTES IN VITRO

    Kim Nh;Funahashi H;Abeydeera Lr;Moon Sj

  • Optimization of real time RT-PCR methods for the analysis of gene expression in mouse eggs and preimplantation embryos

    Yu-Jeong Jeong;Yu-Jeong Jeong;Hye-Won Choi;Hyeon-Sang Shin;Xiang-Shun Cui

  • Spindle assembly checkpoint and its regulators in meiosis

    Shao-Chen Sun;Nam-Hyung Kim

  • Role of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition and its effects on embryonic stem cells

    Ye-Seul Kim;Bo-Rim Yi;Nam-Hyung Kim;Kyung-Chul Choi

  • Presence of organic osmolytes in maturation medium enhances cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes.

    Hiroaki Funahashi;Nam Hyung Kim;Todd T. Stumpf;Thomas C. Cantley

  • Deoxynivalenol exposure induces autophagy/apoptosis and epigenetic modification changes during porcine oocyte maturation.

    Jun Han;Qiao-Chu Wang;Cheng-Cheng Zhu;Jun Liu

  • Optimization of 25 kDa linear polyethylenimine for efficient gene delivery

    Sun-Hyung Huh;Hyun-Jin Do;Hye-Young Lim;Dong-Ku Kim

  • The toxic effects and possible mechanisms of Bisphenol A on oocyte maturation of porcine in vitro

    Teng Wang;Jun Han;Xing Duan;Bo Xiong

  • Microtubule and microfilament organization in maturing human oocytes.

    Nam-Hyung Kim;Hyung Min Chung;Kwang-Yul Cha;Kil Saeng Chung

  • CRISPR/Cas9 Nuclease-Mediated Gene Knock-In in Bovine-Induced Pluripotent Cells

    Young Tae Heo;Xiaoyuan Quan;Yong Nan Xu;Soonbong Baek

  • The lack of histological changes of CDMA cellular phone-based radio frequency on rat testis.

    Hae June Lee;Jeong Ki Pack;Tae Hong Kim;Nam Kim

  • The distribution and requirements of microtubules and microfilaments during fertilization and parthenogenesis in pig oocytes

    N H Kim;K S Chung;B N Day

  • Exposure to HT-2 toxin causes oxidative stress induced apoptosis/autophagy in porcine oocytes

    Yue Zhang;Jun Han;Cheng-Cheng Zhu;Feng Tang

  • Small GTPase RhoA regulates cytoskeleton dynamics during porcine oocyte maturation and early embryo development

    Yu Zhang;Xing Duan;Rui Cao;Hong-Lin Liu

  • The Association of Mitochondrial Potential and Copy Number with Pig Oocyte Maturation and Developmental Potential

    Seul-Ki Lee;Ming-Hui Zhao;Jung-Woo Kwon;Ying-Hua Li

  • Expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and neomycin resistant (NeoR) genes in porcine embryos following nuclear transfer with porcine fetal fibroblasts transfected by retrovirus vector.

    Sang Jun Uhm;Nam-Hyung Kim;Teoan Kim;Hyung Min Chung

Frequent Co-Authors

Jin-Hoi Kim
Jin-Hoi Kim Konkuk University
Billy N. Day
Billy N. Day University of Missouri
Song Yub Shin
Song Yub Shin Chosun University
Hyung-Min Chung
Hyung-Min Chung Konkuk University
Randall S. Prather
Randall S. Prather University of Missouri
Jun Liu
Jun Liu Yangzhou University
Gerald Schatten
Gerald Schatten University of Pittsburgh
Inhwan Hwang
Inhwan Hwang Pohang University of Science and Technology
Kyungjin Kim
Kyungjin Kim Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology
Teruhiko Wakayama
Teruhiko Wakayama University of Yamanashi

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to many dynamic careers. Today, students have the flexibility to pursue specialized fields through online degree programs, making advanced education more accessible than ever.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, consider a doctorate in healthcare administration online. This pathway is ideal for biochemistry graduates aiming for executive or administrative roles in medical organizations.

If pharmacy piques your interest, pursuing the best online pharmacy school programs can lead to rewarding careers as pharmacists or pharmaceutical researchers.

Students passionate about human movement and wellness can benefit from an online bachelor's degree in exercise science or advance with an online kinesiology bachelor's degree. These programs prepare graduates for roles in sports science, rehabilitation, physical therapy, or wellness coaching.

Each of these online degrees not only builds on a strong foundation of biology or biochemistry but also aligns with growing industries and diverse career opportunities across healthcare, science, and applied physiology.

Best Scientists Citing Nam-Hyung Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles