World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
16364
World Ranking
6722
National Ranking
3119

Billy N. Day publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Billy N. Day sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 220 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Billy N. Day D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Billy N. Day sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - The Morrison Award, American Society of Animal Science
  • 1993 - L. E. Casida Award, American Society of Animal Science
  • 1982 - Animal Physiology and Endocrinology Award, American Society of Animal Science

Overview

Billy N. Day is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their recent research includes the paper titled Abstract 4360103: Regulation by N-acetyl lysyltyrosylcysteine amide of the immunomodulatory network improves cardiac function in type 2 diabetic mice, published in 2025 in the journal Circulation.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Tarun Pant
  • Araceli Morelos
  • Deron W. Jones
  • Raman Gulab Brajesh
  • Kirkwood A. Pritchard

Billy N. Day publishes predominantly in the venue Circulation.

The scientist has been recognized with several awards from the American Society of Animal Science, including:

  • The Morrison Award (1999)
  • L. E. Casida Award (1993)
  • Animal Physiology and Endocrinology Award (1982)

Best Publications

  • Production of α-1,3-Galactosyltransferase Knockout Pigs by Nuclear Transfer Cloning

    Liangxue Lai;Donna Kolber-Simonds;Kwang-Wook Park;Hee-Tae Cheong

  • Synchronization of meiosis in porcine oocytes by exposure to dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate improves developmental competence following in vitro fertilization.

    Hiroaki Funahashi;Thomas C. Cantley;Billy N. Day

  • Fertilization and subsequent development in vitro of pig oocytes inseminated in a modified tris-buffered medium with frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa.

    Lalantha R. Abeydeera;Billy N. Day

  • Development of Early Porcine Embryos In Vitro and In Vivo

    Zoltán Macháty;Billy N. Day;Randall S. Prather

  • Translocation of active mitochondria during pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in vitro

    QY Sun;GM Wu;L Lai;KW Park

  • Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein.

    Kwang-Wook Park;Hee-Tae Cheong;Liangxue Lai;Gi-Sun Im

  • Development and viability of pig oocytes matured in a protein-free medium containing epidermal growth factor.

    L.R. Abeydeera;W.H. Wang;T.C. Cantley;A. Rieke

  • Transgenic pig expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein produced by nuclear transfer using colchicine‐treated fibroblasts as donor cells

    Liangxue Lai;Kwang-Wook Park;Hee-Tae Cheong;Hee-Tae Cheong;Birgit Kühholzer

  • Flow Cytometric Cell Cycle Analysis of Cultured Porcine Fetal Fibroblast Cells

    Andrew C. Boquest;Billy N. Day;Randall S. Prather

  • Maturation in vitro of pig oocytes in protein-free culture media: fertilization and subsequent embryo development in vitro.

    Lalantha R Abeydeera;Wei-hua Wang;Randall S. Prather;Billy N. Day

  • PAWP, a Sperm-specific WW Domain-binding Protein, Promotes Meiotic Resumption and Pronuclear Development during Fertilization * ♦

    Alexander T.H. Wu;Peter Sutovsky;Gaurishankar Manandhar;Wei Xu

  • Effects of the Porcine Oviduct-Specific Glycoprotein on Fertilization, Polyspermy, and Embryonic Development In Vitro

    Andrew J. Kouba;Lalantha R. Abeydeera;Idania M. Alvarez;Billy N. Day

  • Use of low-salt culture medium for in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes is associated with elevated oocyte glutathione levels and enhanced male pronuclear formation after in vitro fertilization.

    Hiroaki Funahashi;Thomas C. Cantley;Todd T. Stumpf;Steven L. Terlouw

  • Effects of oocyte maturation media on development of pig embryos produced by in vitro fertilization

    W. H. Wang;L. R. Abeydeera;T. C. Cantley;B. N. Day

  • Morphologic comparison of ovulated and in vitro-matured porcine oocytes, with particular reference to polyspermy after in vitro fertilization.

    Wei-Hua Wang;Lalantha R. Abeydeera;Randall S. Prather;Billy N. Day

  • Birth of piglets preselected for gender following in vitro fertilization of in vitro matured pig oocytes by X and Y chromosome bearing spermatozoa sorted by high speed flow cytometry.

    L.R Abeydeera;L.A Johnson;G.R Welch;W.H Wang

  • Presence of epidermal growth factor during in vitro maturation of pig oocytes and embryo culture can modulate blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization.

    Lalantha R. Abeydeera;Wei‐Hua Wang;Thomas C. Cantley;August Rieke

  • In vitro development of in vitro-matured porcine oocytes following chemical activation or in vitro fertilization.

    Hiroaki Funahashi;Thomas C. Cantley;Todd T. Stumpf;Steven L. Terlouw

  • Morphologic Evaluation and Actin Filament Distribution in Porcine Embryos Produced In Vitro and In Vivo

    Wei-Hua Wang;Lalantha R. Abeydeera;Yong-Mahn Han;Randall S. Prather

  • Microtubule and microfilament dynamics in porcine oocytes during meiotic maturation.

    Nam Hyung Kim;Hiroaki Funahashi;Randall S. Prather;Gerald Schatten

Frequent Co-Authors

Randall S. Prather
Randall S. Prather University of Missouri
Peter Sutovsky
Peter Sutovsky University of Missouri
Nam-Hyung Kim
Nam-Hyung Kim Chungbuk National University
Liangxue Lai
Liangxue Lai Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health
William R. Lamberson
William R. Lamberson University of Missouri
Gerald Schatten
Gerald Schatten University of Pittsburgh
H.A. Garverick
H.A. Garverick University of Missouri
Heide Schatten
Heide Schatten University of Missouri
Richard Oko
Richard Oko Queen's University
Dale A. Redmer
Dale A. Redmer North Dakota State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The world of Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a wide range of rewarding online degrees and career options in the USA. Whether you’re aiming for direct patient care or want to support healthcare from behind the scenes, online education makes these pathways more accessible than ever.

Interested in data-driven roles? health information management online programs train you to oversee medical records and healthcare databases—fields where biology expertise is increasingly valued.

If nutrition science intrigues you, consider a master degree in nutrition online. These programs can help biochemistry graduates gain specialized knowledge to work in dietary consulting, wellness, and public health.

For hands-on diagnostic careers, becoming an ultrasound technician is now more convenient thanks to ultrasound tech school options available online. You can study imaging techniques and contribute to patient care in a rapidly growing sector.

Likewise, accelerated radiology tech programs online let you quickly enter the field of medical imaging, which draws heavily from biology and biochemistry knowledge.

Exploring these related online degrees can help biology and biochemistry students discover specialized career pathways suited to their strengths and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Billy N. Day

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles