World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
58
Citations
10438
World Ranking
2105
National Ranking
1043

Keith E. Latham publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith E. Latham sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 177 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Keith E. Latham D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith E. Latham sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith E. Latham is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a concentrated focus on reproductive biology and fertility.

Their work often addresses topics such as reproductive biology and fertility, ovarian function and disorders, reproductive physiology in livestock, renal and related cancers, sperm and testicular function, and pluripotent stem cells research.

Prominent publications by Keith E. Latham include:

  • Negative impact of high doses of follicle-stimulating hormone during superovulation on the ovulatory follicle function in small ovarian reserve dairy heifers, 2020, Biology of Reproduction
  • Excessive follicle-stimulating hormone during ovarian stimulation of cattle may induce premature luteinization of most ovulatory-size follicles, 2022, Biology of Reproduction
  • Probing lasting cryoinjuries to oocyte-embryo transcriptome, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • 040 Excessive FSH doses during superovulation of small ovarian reserve heifers induce premature cumulus expansion and diminish oocyte developmental potential, 2023, Animal - science proceedings

Keith E. Latham frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Some of their frequent coauthors include Kaitlin R Karl, Zaramasina L Clark, James J. Ireland, Fermin Jimenez-Krassel, and Emily Gibbings.

Their research is published primarily in venues such as:

  • Biology of Reproduction
  • PLoS ONE
  • Animal - science proceedings

Their main areas of study involve medicine with a strong inclination towards public health, environmental and occupational health, reproductive medicine, molecular biology, and agronomy and crop science. This interdisciplinary approach supports a comprehensive perspective on reproductive physiology and associated biological systems.

Best Publications

  • Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmt1 gene

    Carina Y. Howell;Timothy H. Bestor;Feng Ding;Keith E. Latham

  • Defects in regulation of apoptosis in caspase-2-deficient mice

    Louise Bergeron;Gloria I. Perez;Glen Macdonald;Lianfa Shi

  • Disruption of Imprinted Gene Methylation and Expression in Cloned Preimplantation Stage Mouse Embryos

    Mellissa R.W. Mann;Young Gie Chung;Leisha D. Nolen;Raluca I. Verona

  • Expression and regulation of genes associated with cell death during murine preimplantation embryo development

    Andrea Jurisicova;Keith E. Latham;Robert F. Casper;Susannah L. Varmuza

  • Myogenic lineage determination and differentiation: Evidence for a regulatory gene pathway

    Deborah F. Pinney;Sonia H. Pearson-White;Stephen F. Konieczny;Keith E. Latham

  • Embryonic genome activation.

    K E Latham;R M Schultz

  • MECHANISMS AND CONTROL OF EMBRYONIC GENOME ACTIVATION IN MAMMALIAN EMBRYOS

    Keith E. Latham

  • Abnormal Regulation of DNA Methyltransferase Expression in Cloned Mouse Embryos

    Young Gie Chung;Sarayu Ratnam;J. Richard Chaillet;J. Richard Chaillet;Keith E. Latham

  • Somatic Cell-Like Features of Cloned Mouse Embryos Prepared with Cultured Myoblast Nuclei

    Shaorong Gao;Young Gie Chung;Jean W. Williams;Joan Riley

  • Acquisition of a transcriptionally permissive state during the 1-cell stage of mouse embryogenesis.

    Keith E. Latham;Davor Solter;Richard M. Schultz

  • Igf2r and Igf2 gene expression in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and parthenogenetic preimplantation mouse embryos: absence of regulation by genomic imprinting.

    K E Latham;A S Doherty;C D Scott;R M Schultz

  • Maternal depletion of CTCF reveals multiple functions during oocyte and preimplantation embryo development

    Le Ben Wan;Hua Pan;Sridhar Hannenhalli;Yong Cheng

  • Rapid H1 linker histone transitions following fertilization or somatic cell nuclear transfer: evidence for a uniform developmental program in mice

    Shaorong Gao;Young Gie Chung;Missag H Parseghian;Gretchen J King

  • Nuclear-Cytoplasmic “Tug of War” During Cloning: Effects of Somatic Cell Nuclei on Culture Medium Preferences of Preimplantation Cloned Mouse Embryos

    Young Gie Chung;Mellissa R.W. Mann;Marisa S. Bartolomei;Keith E. Latham

  • X chromosome reactivation and regulation in cloned embryos.

    Leisha D. Nolen;Shaorong Gao;Zhiming Han;Mellissa R.W. Mann

  • TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MTEAD-2 IS SELECTIVELY EXPRESSED AT THE BEGINNING OF ZYGOTIC GENE EXPRESSION IN THE MOUSE

    Kotaro J. Kaneko;Emily B. Cullinan;Keith E. Latham;Melvin L. DePamphilis

  • Species-dependent expression patterns of DNA methyltransferase genes in mammalian oocytes and preimplantation embryos.

    Rita Vassena;R. Dee Schramm;Keith E. Latham

  • Analysis of G protein α subunit mRNA abundance in preimplantation mouse embryos using a rapid, quantitative RT-PCR approach

    Lakshmi Rambhatla;Bela Patel;N. Dhanasekaran;Keith E. Latham

  • Ooplasmic donation in humans The potential for epigenic modifications

    Susan M. Hawes;Carmen Sapienza;Keith E. Latham

  • Genomes & Developmental Control X chromosome reactivation and regulation in cloned embryos

    Leisha D. Nolen;Shaorong Gao;Zhiming Han;Young Gie Chung

Frequent Co-Authors

Shaorong Gao
Shaorong Gao Tongji University
Marisa S. Bartolomei
Marisa S. Bartolomei University of Pennsylvania
Peter Sutovsky
Peter Sutovsky University of Missouri
Ryuzo Yanagimachi
Ryuzo Yanagimachi University of Hawaii at Manoa
Richard M. Schultz
Richard M. Schultz University of Pennsylvania
James J. Ireland
James J. Ireland Michigan State University
Kelle H. Moley
Kelle H. Moley Washington University in St. Louis
John J. Eppig
John J. Eppig Jackson Laboratory
Eli Y. Adashi
Eli Y. Adashi Brown University
Arie P. Otte
Arie P. Otte University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in Molecular Biology can open the door to a wide range of career pathways, especially when considering interdisciplinary fields. Many students pursue related online degrees that connect biology to fields like psychology and counseling, giving them additional options beyond laboratory research.

Professionals interested in the mental health field may find value in pursuing an online masters degree in mental health counseling. This path can be especially rewarding for those considering patient-facing roles. Similarly, students with a passion for law and investigation might explore forensic psychology. Learn more about how much does a forensic psychologist make and the opportunities in this dynamic area.

For those interested in developmental biology or working with younger populations, an online masters in child psychology provides additional skills to support children and adolescents. Cost is a key concern for many students, so researching the cheapest online master's in counseling can help you find programs that fit your budget.

By considering these related paths, students in Molecular Biology can diversify their skills and expand their career opportunities in both science and applied human services.

Best Scientists Citing Keith E. Latham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles