World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
10306
World Ranking
4053
National Ranking
1169

Lawrence M. Wein publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Wein sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 110 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Lawrence M. Wein D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Wein sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For model-based research to characterize and improve homeland security operations.

Overview

Lawrence M. Wein is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple interdisciplinary fields, with a focus on economics, genetics, artificial intelligence, modeling, simulation, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their recent publications cover a diverse range of topics and appear in several reputable journals. These include:

  • Asymptotically Optimal Control of a Centralized Dynamic Matching Market with General Utilities, 2022, published in Operations Research
  • No Detectable Surge in SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Attributable to the April 7, 2020 Wisconsin Election, 2020, published in American Journal of Public Health
  • A cost-effectiveness analysis of the number of samples to collect and test from a sexual assault, 2020, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Analysis of the genealogy process in forensic genetic genealogy, 2022, featured in Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • Best arm identification in generalized linear bandits, 2021, published in Operations Research Letters

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • José Blanchet
  • Martin I. Reiman
  • Kathy Leung
  • Joseph T. Wu
  • Kuang Xu

Lawrence M. Wein has published multiple papers in notable academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • Operations Research
  • American Journal of Public Health
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Operations Research Letters

Their research covers major thematic areas such as:

  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Infection control and ventilation
  • Forensic and genetic research
  • Advanced queuing theory analysis
  • Stochastic processes and financial applications
  • Economic theories and models
  • COVID-19 pandemic impacts

Subfields relevant to their work include:

  • Economics and econometrics
  • Genetics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Modeling and simulation
  • Pulmonary and respiratory medicine

In 2009, Lawrence M. Wein was awarded membership in the National Academy of Engineering. This recognition cited their model-based research to characterize and improve homeland security operations.

Best Publications

  • Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information

    Martin I. Reiman;Lawrence M. Wein;Fangruo Chen;Eric Von Hippel

  • Scheduling semiconductor wafer fabrication

    L.M. Wein

  • Inventory Management of Remanufacturable Products

    L. Beril Toktay;Lawrence M. Wein;Stefanos A. Zenios

  • Echelon Reorder Points, Installation Reorder Points, and the Value of Centralized Demand Information

    Martin I. Reiman;Lawrence M. Wein;Fangruo Chen

  • An Inverse-Optimization-Based Auction Mechanism to Support a Multi-Attribute Rfq Process

    Damian R. Beil;Lawrence M. Wein

  • Scheduling Networks of Queues: Heavy Traffic Analysis of a Two-Station Closed Network

    J. Michael Harrison;Lawrence M. Wein

  • Analysis of a Forecasting-Production-Inventory System with Stationary Demand

    L. Beril Toktay;Lawrence M. Wein

  • Empirical evaluation of a queueing network model for semiconductor wafer fabrication

    Hong Chen;J. Michael Harrison;Avi Mandelbaum;Ann Van Ackere

  • Dynamic scheduling of a multiclass make-to-stock queue

    Lawrence M. Wein

  • Optimal Scheduling of Radiotherapy and Angiogenic Inhibitors

    Ayla Ergun;Kevin Camphausen;Lawrence M. Wein

  • Due-date setting and priority sequencing in a multiclass M/G/1 queue

    Lawrence M. Wein

  • Scheduling Network of Queues: Heavy Traffic Analysis of Multistation Network With Controllable Inputs

    Lawrence M. Wein

  • A broader view of the job-shop scheduling problem

    Lawrence M. Wein;Philippe B. Chevalier

  • Scheduling a Make-To-Stock Queue: Index Policies and Hedging Points

    Michael H. Veatch;Lawrence M. Wein

  • Scheduling networks of queues: heavy traffic analysis of a simple open network

    J. M. Harrison;L. M. Wein

  • Optimal Control of a Two-Station Tandem Production/Inventory System

    Michael H. Veatch;Lawrence M. Wein

  • Analyzing the control of mosquito-borne diseases by a dominant lethal genetic system.

    Michael P. Atkinson;Zheng Su;Nina Alphey;Luke S. Alphey

  • Pooled Testing for HIV Screening: Capturing the Dilution Effect

    Lawrence M. Wein;Stefanos A. Zenios

  • Analysis of a Decentralized Production-Inventory System

    René Caldentey;Lawrence M. Wein

  • Dynamic multidrug therapies for HIV: a control theoretic approach

    Lawrence M. Wein;Stefanos A. Zenios;Martin A. Nowak

  • Scheduling networks of queues: heavy traffic analysis of a multistation closed network

    Philippe B. Chevalier;Lawrence M. Wein

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin I. Reiman
Martin I. Reiman Columbia University
David Kirn
David Kirn University of California, Berkeley
Dennis J. Selkoe
Dennis J. Selkoe Brigham and Women's Hospital
Christopher B. Barrett
Christopher B. Barrett Cornell University
J. Michael Harrison
J. Michael Harrison Stanford University
Glenn M. Chertow
Glenn M. Chertow Stanford University
L. Beril Toktay
L. Beril Toktay Georgia Institute of Technology
Alan S. Perelson
Alan S. Perelson Los Alamos National Laboratory
Luke Alphey
Luke Alphey University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students often benefit from expanding their expertise across other fields. For many, an online master's in communication can build essential skills in presenting complex technical information, collaborating with teams, and navigating workplace dynamics. This can be especially valuable in today's globally connected work environment.

If you're interested in the business side of innovation or want to start your own tech company, pursuing an online mba entrepreneurship could be a strong next step. Many working professionals look for flexible and affordable MBA options, like online mba programs no gmat low-cost, making it easier to advance your studies without interrupting your career.

Project management expertise is also in high demand across all areas of engineering and technology. You can develop this practical skill set by enrolling in one of the cheapest online master's in project management programs, helping you lead successful teams and bring technical projects to life on time and on budget.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence M. Wein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles