World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shaorong Gao

Shaorong Gao

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 66 1623 1451 38 38 241 14429

Shaorong Gao publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shaorong Gao between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shaorong Gao published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2025. 57 of the 325 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2025. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 35 publications
1999 2025

325 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shaorong Gao: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 4
2004 3
2005 6
2006 4
2007 5
2008 8
2009 12
2010 18
2011 8
2012 5
2013 8
2014 12
2015 17
2016 17
2017 15
2018 20
2019 10
2020 17
2021 21
2022 34
2023 21
2024 22
2025 35
Total 325
Download as CSV

Shaorong Gao publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaorong Gao sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–246 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 241 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72 241
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Shaorong Gao D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaorong Gao sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95 66
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Shaorong Gao is affiliated with Tongji University in China and has a substantial publication record primarily in the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with additional work in medicine. Their research spans molecular biology, genetics, public health, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and cancer research.

The main research topics covered by Shaorong Gao include:

  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Shaorong Gao are:

  • FTO mediates LINE1 m 6 A demethylation and chromatin regulation in mESCs and mouse development (2022, Science)
  • Insights into epigenetic patterns in mammalian early embryos (2020, Protein & Cell)
  • Nuclear m6A reader YTHDC1 regulates the scaffold function of LINE1 RNA in mouse ESCs and early embryos (2021, Protein & Cell)
  • DUX-miR-344-ZMYM2-Mediated Activation of MERVL LTRs Induces a Totipotent 2C-like State (2020, Cell stem cell)
  • Heterochromatin establishment during early mammalian development is regulated by pericentromeric RNA and characterized by non-repressive H3K9me3 (2020, Nature Cell Biology)

Frequent co-authors working with Shaorong Gao include:

  • Xiaochen Kou
  • Yanhong Zhao
  • Jiayu Chen
  • Yawei Gao
  • Jiqing Yin

Publication venues where Shaorong Gao has contributed frequently include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Protein & Cell
  • Nature Communications
  • Cell stem cell
  • Cell Reports

Best Publications

  • iPS cells can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryos.

    Lan Kang;Jianle Wang;Yu Zhang;Zhaohui Kou

  • Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos

    Xiaoyu Liu;Chenfei Wang;Wenqiang Liu;Jingyi Li

  • Allelic reprogramming of the histone modification H3K4me3 in early mammalian development

    Bingjie Zhang;Hui Zheng;Bo Huang;Bo Huang;Wenzhi Li

  • Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC Induction Reveals an Important Role of DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation in Reprogramming

    Yawei Gao;Jiayu Chen;Ke Li;Tong Wu

  • Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin during mammalian embryo development

    Chenfei Wang;Xiaoyu Liu;Yawei Gao;Lei Yang

  • Dense Chromatin Activates Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to Regulate H3 Lysine 27 Methylation

    Wen Yuan;Tong Wu;Hang Fu;Chao Dai

  • Proteome of mouse oocytes at different developmental stages

    Shufang Wang;Zhaohui Kou;Zhiyi Jing;Yu Zhang

  • Stella safeguards the oocyte methylome by preventing de novo methylation mediated by DNMT1

    Yingfeng Li;Yingfeng Li;Zhuqiang Zhang;Jiayu Chen;Wenqiang Liu

  • Dynamic Reprogramming of Histone Acetylation and Methylation in the First Cell Cycle of Cloned Mouse Embryos

    Fengchao Wang;Zhaohui Kou;Yu Zhang;Shaorong Gao

  • Somatic Cell-Like Features of Cloned Mouse Embryos Prepared with Cultured Myoblast Nuclei

    Shaorong Gao;Young Gie Chung;Jean W. Williams;Joan Riley

  • Identification of key factors conquering developmental arrest of somatic cell cloned embryos by combining embryo biopsy and single-cell sequencing.

    Wenqiang Liu;Xiaoyu Liu;Chenfei Wang;Yawei Gao

  • Protein Expression Landscape of Mouse Embryos during Pre-implantation Development.

    Yawei Gao;Xiaoyu Liu;Bin Tang;Chong Li

  • Rapid H1 linker histone transitions following fertilization or somatic cell nuclear transfer: evidence for a uniform developmental program in mice

    Shaorong Gao;Young Gie Chung;Missag H Parseghian;Gretchen J King

  • X chromosome reactivation and regulation in cloned embryos.

    Leisha D. Nolen;Shaorong Gao;Zhiming Han;Mellissa R.W. Mann

  • Modeling Dravet syndrome using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and directly converted neurons

    Jiao Jiao;Yuanyuan Yang;Yiwu Shi;Jiayu Chen

  • Differentiated cells are more efficient than adult stem cells for cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

    Li-Ying Sung;Shaorong Gao;Hongmei Shen;Hui Yu

  • Genetic correction of β-thalassemia patient-specific iPS cells and its use in improving hemoglobin production in irradiated SCID mice

    Yixuan Wang;Chen-Guang Zheng;Yonghua Jiang;Jiqin Zhang

  • Insights into epigenetic patterns in mammalian early embryos

    Ruimin Xu;Chong Li;Xiaoyu Liu;Shaorong Gao

  • Histone methyltransferase G9a contributes to H3K27 methylation in vivo.

    Hui Wu;Xiuzhen Chen;Jun Xiong;Yingfeng Li

  • SIRT6 Controls Hematopoietic Stem Cell Homeostasis through Epigenetic Regulation of Wnt Signaling

    Hu Wang;Daojun Diao;Zhencan Shi;Xudong Zhu

Frequent Co-Authors

Yu Zhang
Yu Zhang Peking University
Keith E. Latham
Keith E. Latham Michigan State University
Yong Zhang
Yong Zhang Tongji University
Tong Wu
Tong Wu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Cizhong Jiang
Cizhong Jiang Tongji University
Hailin Wang
Hailin Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Miguel A. Esteban
Miguel A. Esteban Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health
Hans R. Schöler
Hans R. Schöler Max Planck Society
Qing-Yuan Sun
Qing-Yuan Sun Chinese Academy of Sciences
Hung-Fat Tse
Hung-Fat Tse University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens new doors—not just in science labs, but across a diverse range of healthcare and research settings. Many students enhance their credentials through online degrees tailored to meet their career goals.

If you’re interested in clinical or patient care, programs like capella university nursing accreditation highlight the importance of attending accredited schools. Accreditation ensures you meet industry standards and can sit for essential exams.

For those who already have nursing experience, rn to bsn to msn online programs offer flexible, accelerated pathways to advanced roles in healthcare leadership and research.

When choosing a school, consider options at a non profit university. These institutions often provide higher quality education and greater student support compared to for-profit counterparts.

Military-connected students should look for a online college for military, which can offer tailored resources, flexible scheduling, and tuition assistance to support unique needs.

Whether you’re seeking to broaden your scientific expertise or transition into a related field, online education provides accessible, accredited options to advance your career.

Best Scientists Citing Shaorong Gao

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles