World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
37434
World Ranking
15326
National Ranking
442

Yong Zhang publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yong Zhang sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 154 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Yong Zhang D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yong Zhang sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)

    Yong Zhang;Tao Liu;Clifford A Meyer;Jérôme Eeckhoute

  • Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS

    Jianxing Feng;Tao Liu;Bo Qin;Yong Zhang

  • FoxA1 Translates Epigenetic Signatures into Enhancer-Driven Lineage-Specific Transcription

    Mathieu Lupien;Jérôme Eeckhoute;Clifford A. Meyer;Qianben Wang

  • Androgen receptor regulates a distinct transcription program in androgen-independent prostate cancer

    Qianben Wang;Wei Li;Yong Zhang;Xin Yuan

  • PPARγ and C/EBP factors orchestrate adipocyte biology via adjacent binding on a genome-wide scale

    Martina I. Lefterova;Yong Zhang;David J. Steger;Michael Schupp

  • Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies.

    Tao Liu;Jorge A Ortiz;Len Taing;Clifford A Meyer

  • Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos

    Xiaoyu Liu;Chenfei Wang;Wenqiang Liu;Jingyi Li

  • Integrative genomic analyses reveal clinically relevant long noncoding RNAs in human cancer.

    Zhou Du;Teng Fei;Roel G W Verhaak;Zhen Su

  • Nucleosome dynamics define transcriptional enhancers.

    Housheng Hansen He;Clifford A. Meyer;Hyunjin Shin;Shannon T. Bailey

  • Target analysis by integration of transcriptome and ChIP-seq data with BETA

    Su Wang;Hanfei Sun;Jian Ma;Chongzhi Zang

  • Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo

    Yong Zhang;Zarmik Moqtaderi;Barbara P Rattner;Ghia Euskirchen

  • GFOLD: a generalized fold change for ranking differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data

    Jianxing Feng;Clifford A. Meyer;Qian Wang;Jun S. Liu

  • Chromatin signature of embryonic pluripotency is established during genome activation

    Nadine L. Vastenhouw;Yong Zhang;Yong Zhang;Ian G. Woods;Farhad Imam

  • A Transcriptional Signature and Common Gene Networks Link Cancer with Lipid Metabolism and Diverse Human Diseases

    Heather A. Hirsch;Dimitrios Iliopoulos;Amita Joshi;Yong Zhang

  • NONCODE: an integrated knowledge database of non-coding RNAs

    Changning Liu;Baoyan Bai;Geir Skogerbø;Lun Cai

  • Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin during mammalian embryo development

    Chenfei Wang;Xiaoyu Liu;Yawei Gao;Lei Yang

  • Engineered nanomedicine for myeloma and bone microenvironment targeting

    Archana Swami;Michaela R. Reagan;Pamela Antonia Basto;Yuji Mishima

  • Using MACS to Identify Peaks from ChIP-Seq Data

    Jianxing Feng;Tao Liu;Yong Zhang

  • Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity

    Yiwen Chen;Nicolas Negre;Nicolas Negre;Qunhua Li;Joanna O. Mieczkowska

  • Identification of key factors conquering developmental arrest of somatic cell cloned embryos by combining embryo biopsy and single-cell sequencing.

    Wenqiang Liu;Xiaoyu Liu;Chenfei Wang;Yawei Gao

Frequent Co-Authors

Irene M. Ghobrial
Irene M. Ghobrial Harvard University
X. Shirley Liu
X. Shirley Liu Harvard University
Runsheng Chen
Runsheng Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Shiyin Liu
Shiyin Liu Yunnan University
Myles Brown
Myles Brown Harvard University
Clifford A. Meyer
Clifford A. Meyer Harvard University
Shaorong Gao
Shaorong Gao Tongji University
Yi Zhao
Yi Zhao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yongjian Ding
Yongjian Ding Chinese Academy of Sciences
Mathieu Lupien
Mathieu Lupien Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up an array of academic and career opportunities. Many students pursue online programs for flexibility and accessibility. For those planning to advance their knowledge in nutrition science, enrolling in one of the best schools for masters in nutrition can lead to specialized careers in health, dietetics, or food research.

Those interested in clinical roles may consider healthcare certifications. There are quality online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid, making this pathway more affordable and accessible. Medical assistants looking to further their careers by becoming nurses can take advantage of a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online, streamlining the transition into nursing.

Additionally, earning a bachelor's degree can fast-track your entry into the sciences. Programs such as a bs in biology online let you complete rigorous coursework and prepare for roles in research, education, and laboratory settings. Exploring these diverse educational options can help you tailor your future in science or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Yong Zhang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles