World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
5444
World Ranking
7110
National Ranking
2393

Edward S. Rutherford publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward S. Rutherford sits on this spectrum.

37–46 publications: 11 scientists 47–56 publications: 41 scientists 57–66 publications: 147 scientists 67–76 publications: 219 scientists 77–86 publications: 409 scientists 87–96 publications: 467 scientists 97–106 publications: 613 scientists 107–116 publications: 585 scientists 117–126 publications: 591 scientists 127–136 publications: 567 scientists 137–146 publications: 535 scientists 147–156 publications: 481 scientists 157–166 publications: 404 scientists 167–176 publications: 338 scientists 177–186 publications: 362 scientists 187–196 publications: 309 scientists 197–206 publications: 246 scientists 207–216 publications: 223 scientists 217–226 publications: 205 scientists 227–236 publications: 167 scientists 237–246 publications: 141 scientists 247–256 publications: 150 scientists 257–266 publications: 125 scientists 267–276 publications: 113 scientists 277–286 publications: 92 scientists 287–296 publications: 81 scientists 297–306 publications: 77 scientists 307–316 publications: 64 scientists 317–326 publications: 47 scientists 327–336 publications: 58 scientists 337–346 publications: 52 scientists 347–356 publications: 48 scientists 357–366 publications: 50 scientists 367–376 publications: 30 scientists 377–386 publications: 30 scientists 387–396 publications: 34 scientists 397–406 publications: 25 scientists 407–416 publications: 17 scientists 417–426 publications: 12 scientists 427–436 publications: 20 scientists 437–446 publications: 9 scientists 447–456 publications: 12 scientists 457–466 publications: 11 scientists 467–476 publications: 13 scientists 477–486 publications: 10 scientists 487–496 publications: 7 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 10 scientists 517–526 publications: 9 scientists 527–532 publications: 6 scientists 533+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 533+

This scientist: 105 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 533 publications or more.

Edward S. Rutherford D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward S. Rutherford sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 152 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 28 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 8 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121 D-Index: 3 scientists 122+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 122+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 122 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward S. Rutherford is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and specializes in environmental science. Their research primarily focuses on fish ecology and management studies, along with aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, aquatic ecosystems and phytoplankton dynamics, marine and fisheries research, transboundary water resource management, soil and water nutrient dynamics, and isotope analysis in ecology.

Rutherford has contributed to various subfields including nature and landscape conservation, ecology, environmental chemistry, global and planetary change, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate a concentration on the Laurentian Great Lakes and aquatic ecosystems. Notable papers include:

  • "Consequences of changing water clarity on the fish and fisheries of the Laurentian Great Lakes" (2021, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences)
  • "Potential establishment and ecological effects of bighead and silver carp in a productive embayment of the Laurentian Great Lakes" (2020, Biological Invasions)
  • "A Best Practices Case Study for Scientific Collaboration between Researchers and Managers" (2020, Fisheries)
  • "Potential Effects of Bigheaded Carps on Four Laurentian Great Lakes Food Webs" (2021, North American Journal of Fisheries Management)
  • "Predicting larval alewife transport in Lake Michigan using hydrodynamic and Lagrangian particle dispersion models" (2022, Limnology and Oceanography)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rutherford include Doran M. Mason, Hongyan Zhang, Mark D. Rowe, David B. Bunnell, and Tomas O. Höök.

Rutherford regularly publishes in journals such as the Journal of Great Lakes Research, Biological Invasions, Ecological Economics, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, and Limnology and Oceanography.

In addition to journal articles, Rutherford has a book publication titled "Egg production, spawning biomass and factors influencing recruitment of striped bass in the Potomac River and the upper Chesapeake Bay," published by UNESCO in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Assessing and addressing the re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Central basin hypoxia

    Donald Scavia;J. David Allan;Kristin K. Arend;Steven Bartell

  • Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness

    J. David Allan;Peter B. McIntyre;Sigrid D. P. Smith;Benjamin S. Halpern

  • Dynamics of the Lake Michigan food web, 1970-2000

    Charles P. Madenjian;Gary L. Fahnenstiel;Thomas H. Johengen;Thomas F. Nalepa

  • Recent trends in estuarine fisheries: Predictions of fish production and yield

    Edward D. Houde;Edward S. Rutherford

  • Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management

    David M. Lodge;David M. Lodge;Paul W. Simonin;Stanley W. Burgiel;Reuben P. Keller

  • INDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODEL OF YELLOW PERCH AND WALLEYE POPULATIONS IN ONEIDA LAKE

    Kenneth A. Rose;Edward S. Rutherford;Dennis S. McDermot;John L. Forney

  • Fine-scale spatial variation in ice cover and surface temperature trends across the surface of the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Lacey A. Mason;Lacey A. Mason;Catherine M. Riseng;Andrew D. Gronewold;Edward S. Rutherford

  • Using cultural ecosystem services to inform restoration priorities in the Laurentian Great Lakes

    J David Allan;Sigrid Dp Smith;Peter B McIntyre;Christine A Joseph

  • Sampling a Littoral Fish Assemblage: Comparison of Small-Mesh Fyke Netting and Boat Electrofishing

    Carl R. Ruetz;Donald G. Uzarski;Damon M. Krueger;Edward S. Rutherford

  • Recruitment Variability of Alewives in Lake Michigan

    Charles P. Madenjian;Tomas O. Höök;Edward S. Rutherford;Doran M. Mason

  • Classifying and Forecasting Coastal Upwellings in Lake Michigan Using Satellite Derived Temperature Images and Buoy Data

    Stefan Plattner;Doran M. Mason;George A. Leshkevich;David J. Schwab

  • Biophysical Model of Larval Yellow Perch Advection and Settlement in Lake Michigan

    Dmitry Beletsky;Doran M. Mason;David J. Schwab;Edward S. Rutherford

  • Movement of Walleyes in Lakes Erie and St. Clair Inferred from Tag Return and Fisheries Data

    Hui‐Yu Wang;Edward S. Rutherford;H. Andrew Cook;Donald W. Einhouse

  • Environmental Constraints on Hydropower: An Ex Post Benefit-Cost Analysis of Dam Relicensing in Michigan

    Matthew J. Kotchen;Michael R. Moore;Frank Lupi;Edward S. Rutherford

  • A multi-modeling approach to evaluating climate and land use change impacts in a Great Lakes River Basin

    M. J. Wiley;D. W. Hyndman;B. C. Pijanowski;A. D. Kendall

  • A Regional‐Scale Habitat Suitability Model to Assess the Effects of Flow Reduction on Fish Assemblages in Michigan Streams 1

    Unknown

  • Rating impacts in a multi‐stressor world: a quantitative assessment of 50 stressors affecting the Great Lakes

    Sigrid D. P. Smith;Peter B. McIntyre;Benjamin S. Halpern;Benjamin S. Halpern;Benjamin S. Halpern;Roger M. Cooke

  • Forecasting the Impacts of Silver and Bighead Carp on the Lake Erie Food Web

    Hongyan Zhang;Edward S. Rutherford;Doran M. Mason;Jason T. Breck

  • The relative impacts of nutrient loads and invasive species on a Great Lakes food web: An Ecopath with Ecosim analysis

    Unknown

  • Individual‐Based Model of Young‐of‐the‐Year Striped Bass Population Dynamics. II. Factors Affecting Recruitment in the Potomac River, Maryland

    James H. Cowan;Kenneth A. Rose;Edward S. Rutherford;Edward D. Houde

  • Use of GIS-Derived Landscape-Scale Habitat Features to Explain Spatial Patterns of Fish Density in Michigan Rivers

    Sara M. Creque;Edward S. Rutherford;Troy G. Zorn

  • Early life history of Lake Michigan alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) inferred from intra-otolith stable isotope ratios

    Elise Dufour;William P Patterson;Tomas O Höök;Edward S Rutherford

  • Use of Structured Expert Judgment to Forecast Invasions by Bighead and Silver Carp in Lake Erie

    Marion E. Wittmann;Roger M. Cooke;Roger M. Cooke;John D. Rothlisberger;Edward S. Rutherford

Frequent Co-Authors

Doran M. Mason
Doran M. Mason National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Tomas O. Höök
Tomas O. Höök Purdue University West Lafayette
David J. Schwab
David J. Schwab Michigan Technological University
Charles P. Madenjian
Charles P. Madenjian United States Geological Survey
Kenneth A. Rose
Kenneth A. Rose University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Henry A. Vanderploeg
Henry A. Vanderploeg National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Dmitry Beletsky
Dmitry Beletsky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Edward L. Mills
Edward L. Mills Cornell University
James R. Bence
James R. Bence Michigan State University
Thomas H. Johengen
Thomas H. Johengen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to many related degrees and diverse careers, especially in the USA. Many students with an interest in life sciences also look at online psychology programs to broaden their impact in environmental or human-centered fields.

If you’re fascinated by human behavior and its intersection with the environment, you may wonder how much do forensic psychologists make—a career that can benefit from a background in ecology for crime scene analysis and environmental forensics.

For those passionate about development and nature, there are child psychology masters programs that can prepare you to address environmental effects on child and adolescent mental health.

Budget is often a key concern when advancing education. Consider the cheapest masters in counseling for practical, accessible training that supports conservation psychology careers.

Lastly, accredited clinical psychology degree online options offer flexibility and open avenues to support communities affected by environmental change and biodiversity loss.

Best Scientists Citing Edward S. Rutherford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles