World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
44828
World Ranking
6998
National Ranking
3679

Lawrence B. Marks publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence B. Marks sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 824 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lawrence B. Marks D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence B. Marks sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence B. Marks is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Radiation, and Emergency Medical Services.

The scientist has explored a broad range of topics within these domains, including:

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Management of metastatic bone disease
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment

Lawrence B. Marks has published extensively, contributing to multiple respected venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • UNC Libraries
  • Practical Radiation Oncology
  • Advances in Radiation Oncology
  • Frontiers in Health Services

Recent notable publications provide insight into the focus of their current research activity. These include:

  • Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain, 2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Tumor Control Probability of Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases, 2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC): An Overview, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting Standards, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Coronary Artery Calcifications and Cardiac Risk After Radiation Therapy for Stage III Lung Cancer, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Throughout their research career, Lawrence B. Marks has collaborated frequently with several co-authors. Among these frequent collaborators are:

  • Łukasz Mazur
  • Ellen Yorke
  • Bhishamjit S. Chera
  • Michael T. Milano
  • Louis S. Constine

Best Publications

  • American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline

    Carolyn D. Runowicz;Corinne R. Leach;N. Lynn Henry;Karen S. Henry

  • Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic.

    Lawrence B. Marks;Ellen D. Yorke;Andrew Jackson;Randall K. Ten Haken

  • Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): An Introduction to the Scientific Issues

    Søren M. Bentzen;Louis S. Constine;Joseph O. Deasy;Avi Eisbruch

  • Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

    Benjamin D. Smith;Benjamin D. Smith;Douglas W. Arthur;Thomas A. Buchholz;Bruce G. Haffty

  • Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung.

    Lawrence B Marks;Soren M Bentzen;Joseph O Deasy;Feng-Ming Spring Kong

  • Radiation Dose–Volume Effects in the Brain

    Giovanna Gagliardi;Louis S. Constine;Vitali Moiseenko;Candace Correa

  • Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: An analysis of pooled data of 540 patients

    Stefan L.S. Kwa;Joos V. Lebesque;Jacqueline C.M. Theuws;Lawrence B. Marks

  • Radiation-related heart disease: current knowledge and future prospects.

    Sarah C. Darby;David J. Cutter;Marjan Boerma;Louis S. Constine

  • Predicting radiation pneumonitis after chemoradiation therapy for lung cancer: an international individual patient data meta-analysis.

    David A. Palma;Suresh Senan;Kayoko Tsujino;Robert B. Barriger

  • Radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity: a dose-volume histogram analysis in 201 patients with lung cancer

    Maria L. Hernando;Lawrence B. Marks;Gunilla C. Bentel;Su Min Zhou

  • Radiotherapy dose-volume effects on salivary gland function.

    Joseph O. Deasy;Vitali Moiseenko;Lawrence Marks;K.S. Clifford Chao

  • Changes in Weight, Body Composition, and Factors Influencing Energy Balance Among Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy

    Wendy Demark-Wahnefried;Bercedis L. Peterson;Eric P. Winer;Lawrence Marks

  • Breast cancer: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology

    Robert W. Carlson;Benjamin O. Anderson;Harold J. Burstein;Charles E. Cox

  • High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support as consolidation after standard-dose adjuvant therapy for high-risk primary breast cancer.

    W P Peters;M Ross;J J Vredenburgh;B Meisenberg

  • The linear-quadratic model is inappropriate to model high dose per fraction effects in radiosurgery.

    John P. Kirkpatrick;Jeffrey J. Meyer;Lawrence B. Marks

  • Radiation Dose-Volume Effects of Optic Nerves and Chiasm

    Charles Mayo;Mary K. Martel;Lawrence B. Marks;John Flickinger

  • The incidence and functional consequences of RT-associated cardiac perfusion defects

    Lawrence B. Marks;Xiaoli Yu;Robert G. Prosnitz;Su Min Zhou

  • Injury to the lung from cancer therapy: Clinical syndromes, measurable endpoints, and potential scoring systems

    Sandra McDonald;Philip Rubin;Theodore L. Phillips;Lawrence B. Marks

  • The response of the urinary bladder, urethra, and ureter to radiation and chemotherapy

    Lawrence B. Marks;Peter R. Carroll;Thomas C. Dugan;Mitchell S. Anscher

  • Radiation DoseVolume Effects in the Lung

    Lawrence B.. Marks;Soren M. Bentzen;Joseph O. Deasy;Feng-Ming Kong

Frequent Co-Authors

Mitchell S. Anscher
Mitchell S. Anscher The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Mark W. Dewhirst
Mark W. Dewhirst Duke University
Søren M. Bentzen
Søren M. Bentzen University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lori J. Pierce
Lori J. Pierce University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Louis S. Constine
Louis S. Constine University of Rochester Medical Center
R. Edward Coleman
R. Edward Coleman Duke University
Thomas A. D'Amico
Thomas A. D'Amico Duke University
James J. Vredenburgh
James J. Vredenburgh Yale School of Medicine
James E. Herndon
James E. Herndon Duke University
Suresh Senan
Suresh Senan University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more online study options than ever before. If you’re considering alternatives to a traditional MD program, a bachelor of health information management online is a practical option. This degree prepares students for data-focused roles in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare agencies.

For those interested in administrative healthcare positions, starting with online medical billing and coding courses can lead to fast entry into the workforce. These programs teach critical skills for managing patient records and insurance claims, both in high demand.

If nursing is your passion, there are many cheap online fnp programs that allow registered nurses to become Family Nurse Practitioners. Online options make advanced nursing education more flexible and affordable.

Wondering about costs? Find guidance on how much is online nursing school to help you compare programs and plan your educational journey. These pathways offer flexibility, lower costs, and accessible routes to rewarding healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence B. Marks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles