World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Walter J. Curran

Walter J. Curran

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
70357
World Ranking
3554
National Ranking
1958

Walter J. Curran publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter J. Curran sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,059 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Walter J. Curran D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter J. Curran sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Walter J. Curran is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Medicine with a substantial body of work spanning over 222 publications. Within this domain, they have contributed extensively to subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation, Biomedical Engineering, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research covers a range of topics, specifically:

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Walter J. Curran has contributed to several journals frequently, with a notable number of publications in:

  • Medical Physics (20 publications)
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (16 publications)
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (16 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (11 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (9 publications)

Among the recent papers associated with this researcher are:

  • "Deep learning in medical image registration: a review," 2020, Physics in Medicine and Biology
  • "A review on medical imaging synthesis using deep learning and its clinical applications," 2020, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
  • "A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation," 2021, Physica Medica
  • "CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using deep-attention cycleGAN for pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy," 2020, Medical Physics
  • "Tumor-draining lymph node is important for a robust abscopal effect stimulated by radiotherapy," 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Xiaofeng Yang (80 coauthored works)
  • Yang Lei (75 coauthored works)
  • Tonghe Wang (64 coauthored works)
  • Tian Liu (32 coauthored works)
  • Yabo Fu (24 coauthored works)

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

    Mark R. Gilbert;James J. Dignam;Terri S. Armstrong;Terri S. Armstrong;Jeffrey Scott Wefel

  • Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial

    David W Andrews;Charles B Scott;Paul W Sperduto;Adam E Flanders

  • Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments

    Fred R Hirsch;Giorgio V Scagliotti;James L Mulshine;Regina Kwon

  • Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study

    Jeffrey D. Bradley;Rebecca Paulus;Ritsuko Komaki;Gregory Masters

  • Meta-Analysis of Concomitant Versus Sequential Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Anne Aupérin;Cecile Le Péchoux;Estelle Rolland;Walter J. Curran

  • Recursive Partitioning Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Malignant Glioma Trials

    Walter J. Curran;Charles B. Scott;John Horton;James S. Nelson

  • Sequential vs Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Trial RTOG 9410

    Walter J. Curran;Rebecca Paulus;Corey J. Langer;Ritsuko Komaki

  • Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term results of RTOG 9402.

    Gregory Cairncross;Meihua Wang;Edward Shaw;Robert Jenkins

  • A New Prognostic Index and Comparison to Three Other Indices for Patients With Brain Metastases: An Analysis of 1,960 Patients in the RTOG Database

    Paul W. Sperduto;Brian Berkey;Laurie E. Gaspar;Minesh Mehta

  • Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. an improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy

    Andy Trotti;Roger Byhardt;Joanne Stetz;Clement Gwede

  • Dose-Dense Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial

    Mark R. Gilbert;Meihua Wang;Kenneth D. Aldape;Roger Stupp

  • Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 88–08 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4588: Preliminary Results of a Phase III Trial in Regionally Advanced, Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    William T. Sause;Charles Scott;Samuel Taylor;David H Johnson

  • Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma

    Jan C. Buckner;Edward G. Shaw;Stephanie L. Pugh;Arnab Chakravarti

  • Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone for Pure and Mixed Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma: Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9402

    Gregory Cairncross;B. Berkey;Edward G. Shaw;Robert Brian Jenkins

  • Final Results of Phase III Trial in Regionally Advanced Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer : Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and Southwest Oncology Group

    William Sause;Patricia Kolesar;Samuel Taylor;David H Johnson

  • RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOLLOWED BY CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY WITH CARMUSTINE TO CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY WITH CARMUSTINE FOR PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME: REPORT OF RADIATION THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP 93-05 PROTOCOL

    Luis Souhami;Wendy Seiferheld;David Brachman;Ervin B. Podgorsak

  • Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Prognostic Model

    Lauren E. Abrey;Leah Ben-Porat;Katherine S. Panageas;Joachim Yahalom

  • Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases.

    Laurie E. Gaspar;Charles Scott;Kevin Murray;Walter Curran

  • Neurocognitive Function and Progression in Patients With Brain Metastases Treated With Whole-Brain Radiation and Motexafin Gadolinium: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial

    Christina A. Meyers;Jennifer A. Smith;Andrea Bezjak;Minesh P. Mehta

  • Combined Chemoradiotherapy Regimens of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Locally Advanced Multi-Modality Protocol

    Chandra P. Belani;Hak Choy;Phil Bonomi;Charles Scott

Frequent Co-Authors

Yang Lei
Yang Lei University of Nevada Reno
Tonghe Wang
Tonghe Wang Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Minesh P. Mehta
Minesh P. Mehta University of Maryland, Baltimore
Taofeek K. Owonikoko
Taofeek K. Owonikoko Emory University
Suresh S. Ramalingam
Suresh S. Ramalingam Emory University
Fadlo R. Khuri
Fadlo R. Khuri American University of Beirut
David W. Andrews
David W. Andrews Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Corey J. Langer
Corey J. Langer University of Pennsylvania
Jeffrey J. Olson
Jeffrey J. Olson Emory University
Xingming Deng
Xingming Deng Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a medical career but seeking flexible study options, online degrees are increasingly popular. Many registered nurses can advance their qualifications with rn to bsn online programs, which provide a convenient way to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing without interrupting their career.

If you aren’t already a nurse but wish to enter advanced practice, consider direct entry np programs for non nurses online. These programs allow individuals from non-nursing backgrounds to fast-track into a nurse practitioner role through online coursework and clinical placements.

Some aspiring healthcare professionals look for accessible options and wonder what is the easiest nursing school to get into. Discovering programs with flexible admissions criteria can help students start their nursing journey sooner.

If direct patient care isn’t your primary goal, the world of health administration offers rewarding roles, too. Accredited online programs in medical billing and coding enable quick entry into the healthcare workforce, and you can easily find medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa to help make your education more affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Walter J. Curran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles