World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
9991
World Ranking
8413
National Ranking
4494

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
10011
World Ranking
8221
National Ranking
3524

Derek Evan Nee publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek Evan Nee sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 62 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Derek Evan Nee D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Derek Evan Nee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Derek Evan Nee is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. The subfields they contribute to include cognitive neuroscience, neurology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology.

The main topics of Derek Evan Nee's work encompass various aspects of brain function and cognition. These topics include neural dynamics and brain function, functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, memory and neural mechanisms, cognitive functions and memory, as well as vestibular and auditory disorders.

Notable recent publications by Derek Evan Nee and close collaborators include:

  • Evidence for Hierarchical Cognitive Control in the Human Cerebellum, 2020, Current Biology
  • Integrative frontal-parietal dynamics supporting cognitive control, 2021, eLife
  • Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie currently-relevant, future-relevant, and discarded working memory representations, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Brain Differences Associated with Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Manipulating Reward Sensitivity Using Reward Circuit-Targeted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, 2022, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Frequent coauthors in Derek Evan Nee's research include:

  • Derek M. Smith
  • Ally Dworetsky
  • Megan Dorn
  • Caterina Gratton
  • Steven E. Petersen

Their work has been published repeatedly in several venues, highlighting the primary forums for dissemination in their field. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Current Biology
  • eLife
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Derek Evan Nee's scholarly output consists largely of neuroscience-focused studies, with 37 publications categorized under this main field. The scientist's work in cognitive neuroscience is particularly prominent with 33 related publications. Other subfields such as neurology and experimental and cognitive psychology also feature in their research profile.

Best Publications

  • The Mind and Brain of Short-Term Memory

    John Jonides;Richard L. Lewis;Derek Evan Nee;Cindy A. Lustig

  • Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks

    Derek Evan Nee;Tor D. Wager;John Jonides

  • Frontal Cortex and the Hierarchical Control of Behavior.

    David Badre;Derek Evan Nee

  • Depression, rumination and the default network

    Marc G. Berman;Scott Peltier;Derek Evan Nee;Ethan Kross

  • A Meta-analysis of Executive Components of Working Memory

    Derek Evan Nee;Joshua W. Brown;Mary K. Askren;Mary K. Askren;Marc G. Berman

  • Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory.

    J. Jonides;D.E. Nee

  • Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI.

    Tor D. Wager;Ching-Yune C. Sylvester;Steven C. Lacey;Derek Evan Nee

  • Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory.

    Klaus Oberauer;Stephan Lewandowsky;Edward Awh;Gordon D.A. Brown

  • Processes of Working Memory in Mind and Brain

    John Jonides;Steven C. Lacey;Derek Evan Nee

  • The hierarchical organization of the lateral prefrontal cortex

    Derek Evan Nee;Derek Evan Nee;Mark D'Esposito;Mark D'Esposito

  • Causal evidence for frontal cortex organization for perceptual decision making

    Dobromir Rahnev;Derek Evan Nee;Justin Riddle;Alina Sue Larson

  • Neural correlates of access to short-term memory

    Derek Evan Nee;John Jonides

  • Neural mechanisms of proactive interference-resolution.

    Derek Evan Nee;John Jonides;Marc G. Berman

  • Functional heterogeneity of conflict, error, task-switching, and unexpectedness effects within medial prefrontal cortex

    Derek Evan Nee;Sabine Kastner;Joshua W. Brown

  • Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction

    Elizabeth S. Lorenc;Kartik K. Sreenivasan;Derek E. Nee;Derek E. Nee;Annelinde R.E. Vandenbroucke;Annelinde R.E. Vandenbroucke

  • Neural and behavioral effects of interference resolution in depression and rumination

    Marc G. Berman;Derek Evan Nee;Melynda Casement;Hyang Sook Kim

  • Hippocampal-targeted Theta-burst Stimulation Enhances Associative Memory Formation.

    Arielle Tambini;Derek Evan Nee;Derek Evan Nee;Mark D'Esposito

  • Common and distinct neural correlates of perceptual and memorial selection

    Derek Evan Nee;John Jonides

  • CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Working Memory

    M Deanna;Marc G. Berman;Randy Engle;Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones

  • Dissociable contributions of prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus to short-term memory: evidence for a 3-state model of memory.

    Derek Evan Nee;Derek Evan Nee;John Jonides

Frequent Co-Authors

John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Marc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman University of Chicago
Joshua W. Brown
Joshua W. Brown Indiana University
Thomas E. Nichols
Thomas E. Nichols University of Oxford
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Stephan Lewandowsky
Stephan Lewandowsky University of Bristol
Andrew R. A. Conway
Andrew R. A. Conway Claremont Graduate University
Ethan Kross
Ethan Kross University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of career opportunities in healthcare, research, and technology. Today, students have more flexibility than ever through options like an online bachelor's degree. These programs allow you to pursue your studies from anywhere, often at an accelerated pace.

If earning potential is a key consideration, it’s smart to research the best bachelor's degrees and degrees that make the most money. While neuroscience offers rewarding and intellectually stimulating career paths, degrees in related fields such as bioengineering or computer science may also lead to high-paying roles.

For those concerned about affordability, there are colleges online that accept fafsa, making financial aid accessible to online learners. This support can significantly reduce costs and make your educational journey more manageable.

Overall, online degrees and financial aid options have made neuroscience and related fields more accessible than ever before — and with the right pathway, you can find both personal fulfillment and strong career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Derek Evan Nee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles