World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3958 3649 2219 1998 122 19737

Ethan Kross publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ethan Kross between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ethan Kross published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2017. 13 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2017. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2005 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ethan Kross: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 8
2011 8
2012 6
2013 9
2014 10
2015 6
2016 5
2017 12
2018 3
2019 9
2020 11
2021 12
2022 9
2023 9
2024 5
2025 8
Total 140
Download as CSV

Ethan Kross publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ethan Kross sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ethan Kross D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ethan Kross sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ethan Kross is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in psychology. Their work spans several main fields and subfields with a focus on social, applied, clinical psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's primary field of study is psychology, with 55 publications attributed to this area. More specifically, their subfields of interest include social psychology, sociology and political science, applied psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology.

The research topics explored by Ethan Kross encompass:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Cultural Differences and Values

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Character Lab Tips
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Significant recent papers authored by Ethan Kross are:

  • Social Media and Well-Being: Pitfalls, Progress, and Next Steps, 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Kross's frequent co-authors are:

  • Ariana Orvell
  • Jason S. Moser
  • Philippe Verduyn
  • Özlem Ayduk
  • Susan A. Gelman

Best Publications

  • Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults.

    Ethan Kross;Philippe Verduyn;Emre Demiralp;Jiyoung Park

  • Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well‐Being? A Critical Review

    Philippe Verduyn;Philippe Verduyn;Oscar Ybarra;Maxime Résibois;John Jonides

  • Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence

    Philippe Verduyn;David Seungjae Lee;Jiyoung Park;Holly Shablack

  • Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression

    Marc G. Berman;Ethan Kross;Katherine M. Krpan;Mary K. Askren

  • Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain

    Ethan Kross;Marc G. Berman;Walter Mischel;Edward E. Smith

  • When asking "why" does not hurt. Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions

    Ethan Kross;Ozlem Ayduk;Walter Mischel

  • ‘Willpower’ over the life span: decomposing self-regulation

    Walter Mischel;Ozlem Ayduk;Marc G. Berman;B. J. Casey

  • Prefrontal–striatal pathway underlies cognitive regulation of craving

    Hedy Kober;Peter Mende-Siedlecki;Ethan F. Kross;Jochen Weber

  • Depression, rumination and the default network

    Marc G. Berman;Scott Peltier;Derek Evan Nee;Ethan Kross

  • Facilitating Adaptive Emotional Analysis: Distinguishing Distanced-Analysis of Depressive Experiences From Immersed-Analysis and Distraction

    Ethan Kross;Ozlem Ayduk

  • Making Meaning out of Negative Experiences by Self-Distancing

    Ethan Kross;Ozlem Ayduk

  • From a distance: implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection.

    Özlem Ayduk;Ethan Kross

  • Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: how you do it matters

    Ethan Kross;Emma Bruehlman-Senecal;Jiyoung Park;Aleah Burson

  • Coping with emotions past: the neural bases of regulating affect associated with negative autobiographical memories.

    Ethan Kross;Matthew Davidson;Jochen Weber;Kevin Ochsner

  • Social Media and Well-Being: Pitfalls, Progress, and Next Steps

    Ethan Kross;Philippe Verduyn;Gal Sheppes;Cory K. Costello

  • Social comparison on social networking sites

    Philippe Verduyn;Nino Gugushvili;Karlijn Massar;Karin Täht

  • Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior.

    Ethan Kross;Igor Grossmann

  • Separate neural representations for physical pain and social rejection

    Choong Wan Woo;Leonie Koban;Ethan Kross;Martin A. Lindquist

  • Neural Dynamics of Rejection Sensitivity

    Ethan Kross;Tobias Egner;Kevin Ochsner;Joy Hirsch

  • Exploring Solomon’s Paradox Self-Distancing Eliminates the Self-Other Asymmetry in Wise Reasoning About Close Relationships in Younger and Older Adults

    Igor Grossmann;Ethan Kross

Frequent Co-Authors

Ozlem Ayduk
Ozlem Ayduk University of California, Berkeley
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Philippe Verduyn
Philippe Verduyn Maastricht University
Marc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman University of Chicago
Oscar Ybarra
Oscar Ybarra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patricia J. Deldin
Patricia J. Deldin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Walter Mischel
Walter Mischel Columbia University
Tor D. Wager
Tor D. Wager Dartmouth College
Kevin N. Ochsner
Kevin N. Ochsner Columbia University
Jason S. Moser
Jason S. Moser Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online programs and career opportunities—especially in the rapidly growing field of social work. As a psychology graduate, you might consider becoming a licensed clinical social worker, counselor, or mental health specialist. Each state has unique pathways and requirements for entering these professions.

For example, those interested in becoming a social worker should be aware of the requirements to be a social worker in Maine. If you are planning to practice in another state, you can review the process for becoming a social worker in Maryland, the specific requirements to be a social worker in Massachusetts, or the Michigan social work education requirements.

Online psychology and social work degrees offer flexibility and a broad curriculum, making it easier for students to balance career and education. Each credential leads to different professional roles, so be sure to research your target state’s regulations carefully when charting your career path.

Best Scientists Citing Ethan Kross

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles