World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
19737
World Ranking
3958
National Ranking
2219

Ethan Kross publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ethan Kross sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ethan Kross D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ethan Kross sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ethan Kross is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in psychology. Their work spans several main fields and subfields with a focus on social, applied, clinical psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's primary field of study is psychology, with 55 publications attributed to this area. More specifically, their subfields of interest include social psychology, sociology and political science, applied psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology.

The research topics explored by Ethan Kross encompass:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Cultural Differences and Values

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Character Lab Tips
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Significant recent papers authored by Ethan Kross are:

  • Social Media and Well-Being: Pitfalls, Progress, and Next Steps, 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Kross's frequent co-authors are:

  • Ariana Orvell
  • Jason S. Moser
  • Philippe Verduyn
  • Özlem Ayduk
  • Susan A. Gelman

Best Publications

  • Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults.

    Ethan Kross;Philippe Verduyn;Emre Demiralp;Jiyoung Park

  • Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well‐Being? A Critical Review

    Philippe Verduyn;Philippe Verduyn;Oscar Ybarra;Maxime Résibois;John Jonides

  • Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence

    Philippe Verduyn;David Seungjae Lee;Jiyoung Park;Holly Shablack

  • Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression

    Marc G. Berman;Ethan Kross;Katherine M. Krpan;Mary K. Askren

  • Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain

    Ethan Kross;Marc G. Berman;Walter Mischel;Edward E. Smith

  • When asking "why" does not hurt. Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions

    Ethan Kross;Ozlem Ayduk;Walter Mischel

  • ‘Willpower’ over the life span: decomposing self-regulation

    Walter Mischel;Ozlem Ayduk;Marc G. Berman;B. J. Casey

  • Prefrontal–striatal pathway underlies cognitive regulation of craving

    Hedy Kober;Peter Mende-Siedlecki;Ethan F. Kross;Jochen Weber

  • Depression, rumination and the default network

    Marc G. Berman;Scott Peltier;Derek Evan Nee;Ethan Kross

  • Facilitating Adaptive Emotional Analysis: Distinguishing Distanced-Analysis of Depressive Experiences From Immersed-Analysis and Distraction

    Ethan Kross;Ozlem Ayduk

  • Making Meaning out of Negative Experiences by Self-Distancing

    Ethan Kross;Ozlem Ayduk

  • From a distance: implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection.

    Özlem Ayduk;Ethan Kross

  • Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: how you do it matters

    Ethan Kross;Emma Bruehlman-Senecal;Jiyoung Park;Aleah Burson

  • Coping with emotions past: the neural bases of regulating affect associated with negative autobiographical memories.

    Ethan Kross;Matthew Davidson;Jochen Weber;Kevin Ochsner

  • Social Media and Well-Being: Pitfalls, Progress, and Next Steps

    Ethan Kross;Philippe Verduyn;Gal Sheppes;Cory K. Costello

  • Social comparison on social networking sites

    Philippe Verduyn;Nino Gugushvili;Karlijn Massar;Karin Täht

  • Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior.

    Ethan Kross;Igor Grossmann

  • Separate neural representations for physical pain and social rejection

    Choong Wan Woo;Leonie Koban;Ethan Kross;Martin A. Lindquist

  • Neural Dynamics of Rejection Sensitivity

    Ethan Kross;Tobias Egner;Kevin Ochsner;Joy Hirsch

  • Exploring Solomon’s Paradox Self-Distancing Eliminates the Self-Other Asymmetry in Wise Reasoning About Close Relationships in Younger and Older Adults

    Igor Grossmann;Ethan Kross

Frequent Co-Authors

Ozlem Ayduk
Ozlem Ayduk University of California, Berkeley
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Philippe Verduyn
Philippe Verduyn Maastricht University
Marc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman University of Chicago
Oscar Ybarra
Oscar Ybarra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patricia J. Deldin
Patricia J. Deldin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Walter Mischel
Walter Mischel Columbia University
Tor D. Wager
Tor D. Wager Dartmouth College
Kevin N. Ochsner
Kevin N. Ochsner Columbia University
Jason S. Moser
Jason S. Moser Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online programs and career opportunities—especially in the rapidly growing field of social work. As a psychology graduate, you might consider becoming a licensed clinical social worker, counselor, or mental health specialist. Each state has unique pathways and requirements for entering these professions.

For example, those interested in becoming a social worker should be aware of the requirements to be a social worker in Maine. If you are planning to practice in another state, you can review the process for becoming a social worker in Maryland, the specific requirements to be a social worker in Massachusetts, or the Michigan social work education requirements.

Online psychology and social work degrees offer flexibility and a broad curriculum, making it easier for students to balance career and education. Each credential leads to different professional roles, so be sure to research your target state’s regulations carefully when charting your career path.

Best Scientists Citing Ethan Kross

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles