World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
19123
World Ranking
5430
National Ranking
2416

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
19290
World Ranking
4894
National Ranking
2693

Marc G. Berman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc G. Berman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Marc G. Berman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc G. Berman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc G. Berman is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Clinical Psychology.

Their recent scholarly output includes publications in various scientific journals. Notable papers include "The affective benefits of nature exposure: What's nature got to do with it?" (2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology), "Criterion validity and relationships between alternative hierarchical dimensional models of general and specific psychopathology." (2020, Journal of Abnormal Psychology), "Evidence and theory for lower rates of depression in larger US urban areas" (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), "Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG" (2020, NeuroImage), and "Association of gray matter volumes with general and specific dimensions of psychopathology in children" (2021, Neuropsychopharmacology).

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Marc G. Berman include:

  • Andrew J. Stier
  • Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez
  • Benjamin B. Lahey
  • Tyler M. Moore
  • Antonia N. Kaczkurkin

Marc G. Berman has published extensively in several venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Vision
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their research topics cover a broad range of areas, which include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Best Publications

  • The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature

    Marc G. Berman;John Jonides;Stephen Kaplan

  • Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective.

    Gregory N. Bratman;Christopher B. Anderson;Marc G. Berman;Bobby Cochran

  • The Mind and Brain of Short-Term Memory

    John Jonides;Richard L. Lewis;Derek Evan Nee;Cindy A. Lustig

  • Directed Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation

    Stephen Kaplan;Marc G. Berman

  • Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression

    Marc G. Berman;Ethan Kross;Katherine M. Krpan;Mary K. Askren

  • Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later

    B. J. Casey;Leah H. Somerville;Ian H. Gotlib;Ozlem Ayduk

  • Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain

    Ethan Kross;Marc G. Berman;Walter Mischel;Edward E. Smith

  • ‘Willpower’ over the life span: decomposing self-regulation

    Walter Mischel;Ozlem Ayduk;Marc G. Berman;B. J. Casey

  • Depression, rumination and the default network

    Marc G. Berman;Scott Peltier;Derek Evan Nee;Ethan Kross

  • A Meta-analysis of Executive Components of Working Memory

    Derek Evan Nee;Joshua W. Brown;Mary K. Askren;Mary K. Askren;Marc G. Berman

  • Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center

    Omid Kardan;Peter Gozdyra;Bratislav Misic;Faisal Moola

  • Network-Level Structure-Function Relationships in Human Neocortex

    Bratislav Mišić;Richard F. Betzel;Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • In Search of Decay in Verbal Short-Term Memory

    Marc G. Berman;John Jonides;Richard L. Lewis

  • Prechemotherapy alterations in brain function in women with breast cancer

    Bernadine Cimprich;Patricia Reuter-Lorenz;James Nelson;Patricia M. Clark

  • Neural mechanisms of proactive interference-resolution.

    Derek Evan Nee;John Jonides;Marc G. Berman

  • COVID-19 Attack Rate Increases with City Size

    Andrew Stier;Marc G. Berman;Luis Bettencourt

  • The perception of naturalness correlates with low-level visual Features of environmental scenes

    Marc G. Berman;Michael C. Hout;Omid Kardan;Mary Carol R. Hunter

  • Is the preference of natural versus man-made scenes driven by bottom-up processing of the visual features of nature?

    Omid Kardan;Emre Demiralp;Michael C. Hout;Mary Carol R. Hunter

  • An everyday activity as a treatment for depression: the benefits of expressive writing for people diagnosed with major depressive disorder.

    Katherine M. Krpan;Ethan Kross;Marc G. Berman;Patricia J. Deldin

  • Understanding Nature and Its Cognitive Benefits

    Kathryn E. Schertz;Marc G. Berman

  • Neural and behavioral effects of interference resolution in depression and rumination

    Marc G. Berman;Derek Evan Nee;Melynda Casement;Hyang Sook Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Scott Peltier
Scott Peltier University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ethan Kross
Ethan Kross University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Benjamin B. Lahey
Benjamin B. Lahey University of Chicago
Derek Evan Nee
Derek Evan Nee Florida State University
Bratislav Misic
Bratislav Misic Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Tyler M. Moore
Tyler M. Moore University of Pennsylvania
Monica D. Rosenberg
Monica D. Rosenberg University of Chicago
Ian H. Gotlib
Ian H. Gotlib Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open up a range of rewarding career opportunities, especially in counseling and mental health. Many universities in the USA now offer flexible online programs designed for students who want to enter the field quickly. These programs often feature accelerated coursework, practical experience, and streamlined paths to licensure.

If you're interested in becoming a counselor, consider researching specific requirements for your target state. For example, the fastest way to become a counselor in Rhode Island may differ from the steps involved in the South Carolina fastest counseling programs. Similarly, those looking for efficient licensing routes should look into the fastest way to become a counselor in South Dakota or investigate Tennessee accelerated counseling programs.

Choosing the right online degree program and understanding your state’s specific pathway will ensure you're ready for a successful, impactful career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Marc G. Berman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles