World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
63474
World Ranking
1681
National Ranking
994

Janice M. Morse publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice M. Morse sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 331 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janice M. Morse D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice M. Morse sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janice M. Morse is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine and health professions, with substantial contributions in qualitative research methods and ethics, healthcare quality and management, and patient safety and medication errors.

Their main topics of work include:

  • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment

Janice M. Morse's research intersects several subfields such as sociology and political science, psychiatry and mental health, education, general health professions, and emergency medical services.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Qualitative Health Research
  • Global Qualitative Nursing Research
  • SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
  • International Journal of Qualitative Methods
  • Frontiers in Pediatrics

Key recent papers showcase their engagement with qualitative inquiry and nursing frameworks:

  • The Changing Face of Qualitative Inquiry, 2020, International Journal of Qualitative Methods
  • Developing the Resilience Framework for Nursing and Healthcare, 2021, Global Qualitative Nursing Research
  • Why the Qualitative Health Research (QHR) Review Process Does Not Use Checklists, 2021, Qualitative Health Research
  • Implementation and Outcomes of a Telehealth Neonatology Program in a Single Healthcare System, 2021, Frontiers in Pediatrics
  • Untenable Expectations: Nurses' Work in the Context of Medication Administration, Error, and the Organization, 2022, Global Qualitative Nursing Research

Their frequent coauthors include Dorothy Taylor, Andrew Merryweather, Jacqueline Kent-Marvick, Lisa A. Barry, and Jennifer Harvey, reflecting collaborative efforts across nursing research and healthcare studies.

Best Publications

  • Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp

    Janice M. Morse

  • Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

    Janice M. Morse;Michael Barrett;Maria Mayan;Karin Olson

  • Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals

    Janice M. Morse;Peggy-Anne Field

  • Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry

    Janice M. Morse

  • The Significance of Saturation

    Janice M. Morse

  • Determining Sample Size

    Janice M. Morse

  • Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods

    Janice M. Morse

  • The Unstructured Interactive Interview: Issues of Reciprocity and Risks when Dealing with Sensitive Topics:

    Juliet Corbin;Janice M. Morse

  • Strategies for Sampling

    Janice M. Morse

  • Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews.

    Michele J. McIntosh;Janice M. Morse

  • Concepts of caring and caring as a concept

    J. M. Morse;S. M. Solberg;W. L. Neander;J. L. Bottorff

  • Data Were Saturated . . .

    Janice M. Morse

  • Exploring Empathy: A Conceptual Fit for Nursing Practice?

    Janice M. Morse;Gwen Anderson;Joan L. Bottorff;Olive Yonge

  • Confusing Categories and Themes

    Janice M. Morse

  • Comparative Analysis of Conceptualizations and Theories of Caring

    Janice M. Morse;Joan Bottorff;Wendy Neander;Shirley Solberg

  • Beyond empathy: expanding expressions of caring

    Janice M Morse;Joan Bottorff;Gwen Anderson;Beverley O'Brien

  • Exploring the theoretical basis of nursing using advanced techniques of concept analysis.

    Janice M. Morse

  • Negotiating commitment and involvement in the nurse-patient relationship

    Janice M. Morse

  • Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meaning

    Janice M. Morse

  • Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction

    Janice M. Morse

  • Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation

    Janice M. Morse

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan L. Bottorff
Joan L. Bottorff University of British Columbia
Kathy Charmaz
Kathy Charmaz Sonoma State University
Joy L. Johnson
Joy L. Johnson Simon Fraser University
Sally Thorne
Sally Thorne University of British Columbia
Carole A. Estabrooks
Carole A. Estabrooks University of Alberta
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Michael Barrett
Michael Barrett University of Cambridge
William M. Reynolds
William M. Reynolds Humboldt State University
Trisha Greenhalgh
Trisha Greenhalgh University of Oxford
Sharon E. Straus
Sharon E. Straus University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online opens diverse pathways in mental health, counseling, research, and education. Students can choose flexible online degrees that allow them to balance studies with personal commitments. Many universities across the USA are expanding their digital offerings, making it easier to access high-quality programs from anywhere.

When considering a program, it's important to look at regional strengths and specialties. For example, the top psychology programs in Conway are known for their focus on undergraduate research and hands-on learning. If you're interested in the East Coast, the top psychology programs in Fairfax offer robust training in applied and clinical psychology.

Online learners in the Southeast have excellent choices too. The top psychology degrees in Florida feature unique specializations in forensic and developmental psychology. Meanwhile, the top psychology programs in Georgia stand out for their emphasis on multicultural and community perspectives within the field.

No matter which path you choose, online psychology degrees can lead to rewarding careers in mental health services, education, business, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Janice M. Morse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles