World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 74 1838 1657 1082 953 191 30154
Neuroscience 75 1971 1799 944 843 201 30422

Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 7 of the 210 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1981 2025

210 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 5
1991 2
1992 3
1993 1
1994 4
1995 6
1996 6
1997 2
1998 4
1999 1
2000 4
2001 4
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 7
2006 7
2007 2
2008 6
2009 4
2010 10
2011 12
2012 5
2013 10
2014 13
2015 7
2016 12
2017 9
2018 12
2019 7
2020 11
2021 8
2022 5
2023 5
2024 2
2025 5
Total 210
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 191
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 74
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a concentration in Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Aerospace Engineering, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Space Exploration and Technology
  • High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Memory Processes and Influences

Reuter-Lorenz has contributed to numerous publications, some of the recent notable papers are:

  • The Effects of Long Duration Spaceflight on Sensorimotor Control and Cognition, 2021, Frontiers in Neural Circuits
  • Microgravity effects on the human brain and behavior: Dysfunction and adaptive plasticity, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Brain and Behavioral Evidence for Reweighting of Vestibular Inputs with Long-Duration Spaceflight, 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • Multimodal Imaging of Brain Activity to Investigate Walking and Mobility Decline in Older Adults (Mind in Motion Study): Hypothesis, Theory, and Methods, 2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Neural correlates of working memory training: Evidence for plasticity in older adults, 2020, NeuroImage

Frequently appearing publication venues include:

  • Cerebral Cortex
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Neural Circuits

The researcher has collaborated with several frequent coauthors, namely:

  • Rachael D. Seidler
  • Kathleen E. Hupfeld
  • Heather R. McGregor
  • Yiri E. De Dios
  • Scott J. Wood

Best Publications

  • The Adaptive Brain: Aging and Neurocognitive Scaffolding

    Denise C. Park;Patricia Reuter-Lorenz

  • Neurocognitive Aging and the Compensation Hypothesis

    Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz;Katherine A. Cappell

  • Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications

    Steven C. Cramer;Mriganka Sur;Bruce H. Dobkin;Charles J O'Brien

  • Age Differences in the Frontal Lateralization of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory Revealed by PET

    Patricia A. Reuter-lorenz;John Jonides;Edward E. Smith;Alan Hartley

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Maintenance, reserve and compensation: the cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing

    Roberto Cabeza;Marilyn Albert;Sylvie Belleville;Fergus I. M. Craik

  • How does it STAC up? Revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition.

    Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz;Denise C. Park

  • Emotional category data on images from the International Affective Picture System.

    Joseph A. Mikels;Barbara L. Fredrickson;Gregory R. Larkin;Casey M. Lindberg

  • Aging, Training, and the Brain: A Review and Future Directions

    Cindy Lustig;Priti Shah;Rachael Seidler;Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

  • The Role of Parietal Cortex in Verbal Working Memory

    John Jonides;Eric H. Schumacher;Edward E. Smith;Robert A. Koeppe

  • Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation

    John Jonides;Edward E. Smith;Christy Marshuetz;Robert A. Koeppe

  • Brain aging: reorganizing discoveries about the aging mind

    Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz;Cindy Lustig

  • Rehearsal in spatial working memory.

    Edward Awh;John Jonides;Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

  • New visions of the aging mind and brain.

    Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

  • Human Neuroscience and the Aging Mind: A New Look at Old Problems

    Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz;Denise C. Park

  • Age Differences in Prefontal Recruitment During Verbal Working Memory Maintenance Depend on Memory Load

    Katherine A. Cappell;Leon Gmeindl;Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

  • Differential contributions of the two cerebral hemispheres to the perception of happy and sad faces.

    Patricia Reuter-Lorenz;Richard J. Davidson

  • Age Differences in Deactivation: A Link to Cognitive Control?

    Jonas Persson;Cindy Lustig;James K. Nelson;Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

  • The reduction of saccadic latency by prior offset of the fixation point: an analysis of the gap effect.

    Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz;Howard C. Hughes;Robert Fendrich

  • Divergent trajectories in the aging mind: changes in working memory for affective versus visual information with age.

    Joseph A. Mikels;Gregory R. Larkin;Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz;Laura L. Carstensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Rachael D. Seidler
Rachael D. Seidler University of Florida
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Scott Peltier
Scott Peltier University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman University of Chicago
Jacob J. Bloomberg
Jacob J. Bloomberg Johnson Space Center
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas
Douglas C. Noll
Douglas C. Noll University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph A. Mikels
Joseph A. Mikels DePaul University
Daniel F. Hayes
Daniel F. Hayes University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree online provides flexible pathways for students seeking diverse and rewarding careers. One popular option is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). This role requires targeted education and licensure, which can vary based on your location. For example, you can learn about how to become an mft in Garland to understand the specific steps required in that region.

MFTs play a vital role in supporting couples and families through challenging times. It's important to research local requirements; explore how to become an mft in Gilbert or investigate mft requirements in Glendale for a comparison of what credentials and experience are needed.

Since state and city guidelines can differ, carefully review resources such as how to become a marriage and family therapist in Greensboro to plan your career path. Online degree programs can help you meet educational requirements, complete supervised clinical hours, and prepare for licensure exams—setting you up for success in a growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles